• This topic has 21,679 replies, 378 voices, and was last updated 5 hours ago by rone.
Viewing 40 posts - 16,481 through 16,520 (of 21,680 total)
  • Sir! Keir! Starmer!
  • dazh
    Full Member

    so in your enthusiasm for making brexit work whats your solution to NI issues?

    Irish reunification.

    PS I’m not enthusiastic about ‘making brexit work’, I just recognise that it’s the only option. We’re not rejoining the EU, SM, or CU any time soon. We can either accept that and get on with whatever we do instead, or spend the next 10 years whining about it instead of tackling other more important problems.

    IMo it will lose more votes than it gains.

    The polls don’t appear to agree.

    welshfarmer
    Full Member

    I think it is now perfectly clear what Ernies views are on Brexit and the EU

    Rather than state that

    “the EU is a voluntary UNION of sovereign states whose overarching economic policy is decided upon by considered compromise in agreement with all members and ratified by a parliament of democratically elected MEPs from each state.”

    he waves his fist at the sky and screams

    The whole point of the EU is to force member states to comply with EU directives and economic policies however their electorate might have voted”

    😉

    mcfly
    Free Member

    Del
    Full Member
    The key point is there is no “make brexit work”

    When I see that these days I just interpret it as ‘work with what we have in front of us, not what we wish we had on front of us’ perhaps it’s wishful thinking?🤔

    <don’t get involved in politics threads; don’t get involved in politics threads; don’t…>
    It’s not wishful thinking – it’s pragmatic reality. I was talking to a former cabinet minister last week (One of Theresa’s) – their view was that in Parliament as well as everywhere else, there’s a bell curve of attitudes towards Brexit. Most are in the middle, leaning Remain.

    Rejoining the single market, FoM and any other EU institutions cannot be done from a position of weakness. And we’re in a position of weakness. To growth strength their view was that the first thing we need to fix is the labour market – we’ve lost people from the labour market because of Brexit, Covid, mental health problems, NHS wait lists and early retirement. A healthier labour market means more productivity and more tax revenue.

    The bind that both the government and Starmer find themselves in is that the government is having to move towards higher tax, maintained investment and <some potential future spending cuts> that means spending is higher now. It’s moving towards a continental model, typically a more Labour position.

    So Keir’s job is to demonstrate more competence than the government with holding positions, win the next election and then move back towards sensible Labour policies. Freedom of Movement is hard though – the Unions have always resisted that as a threat to the membership. It’ll be interesting to see where a balance is found on that one.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    I think it is now perfectly clear what Ernies views are on Brexit and the EU

    No they’re not, I never discuss them on stw. I simply state that I am strongly opposed to the EU. I very rarely make any attempt to explain why.

    EU membership is a non-issue. The UK is out of the EU and won’t be joining again anytime soon. Something which me, Keir Starmer, and millions of others, including Mick Lynch, agree on.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    Did you see the thing about 88% of people who voted Labour in 2019 thinking leave was the wrong decision, Dazh?

    If Starmer were pro-Swiss deal that would be enough for some people to vote for him, some of us have stated as much. I won’t vote Labour without that pledge.

    Elections are all about the swing voters and new voters. Some people will never change the party they vote for, core voters if you like. Then there are those who decide the elections, the people who for whatever reason will happily change for percieved personal gain or even the greater good, or even just to stick it to the man. The Labour voter is generally young, economically active and pro Europe.

    The Labour leader is a besuited privileged prick (Knight Commander of the order of the Bath), who happily accepted a peerage but doesn’t like being called “Sir” (I know a lot of teachers who would sympathise but don’t have a choice). He likes to be remembered for Amnesty or Mclibel but made a string of authoritarian decisions in favour of bad cops. And of course is too rich personally to be connectd to his electorate and accepts donations from the pro-Israel something and the car lobby amongst others. The more I’ve read about him the more I’ve come to detest him in a way I haven’t detested a politician since Blair. Jeez, Marine Le Pen is little miss goody two shoes compared to Starmer.

    johnx2
    Free Member

    He’s a weather vane, and an archetypal career politician

    Eh? He had a highly successful career in public law before going into politics pretty late in the day. He only entered the commons in 2015, not a time when opportunists would have seen Labour as the best ticket for advancing some sort of personal agenda, whatever you think that would be.

    , who happily accepted a peerage

    He’s not a peer. Do you know what a peerage is?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    The UK is out of the EU and won’t be joining again anytime soon.

    Scotland and NI might and probably will.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Marine Le Pen is little miss goody two shoes compared to Starmer.

    Ah, so now you are a cheerleader for a far-right racist party. Well I never

    Edukator
    Free Member

    He had a highly successful career in public law

    Yup, he was on the side of right and good on human rights issues then traded it in for a peerage and dismissed cases against bad cops when given th etop job. But it was all about politics, medling in other countrys’ affairs is politics. His legal career was political and ambiguous.

    johnx2
    Free Member

    traded it in for a peerage

    google “peerage”

    Edukator
    Free Member

    Ah, so now you are a cheerleader for a far-right racist party. Well I never

    Her election debate with Macron first time around was brilliant, I was cheering her on in her drunken folly, go Marine go !!!. Best performance in favour of Macron in the whole campaign. 🙂 Marine is a pussy, the people backing her a mix of sharks, tigers, wolves… . I like Marine in the way Tories loved Corbyn and Kinnock.

    “knighthood” then, is that better? What ever you are when you become a “Sir” “Knight” of this or that.

    dazh
    Full Member

    Jeez, Marine Le Pen is little miss goody two shoes compared to Starmer.

    Now you’re just being ridiculous. I don’t think anyone who’s read anything I’ve said about him would think I’m a Starmer fan, but trying to compare him with a far right racist xenophobe is clearly nonsense. Just like comparing Corbyn with far right anti-semites. Is this where the remain/rejoin argument is now? Accusing anyone who doesn’t conform to the uncritically pro-EU viewpoint of being a racist? It’s pathetic quite frankly.

    johnx2
    Free Member

    A peerage puts you in the house of lords, knighthoods are ten a penny but no mean achievement for a working class lad and hard to turn down (though I’ve more respect for those who do turn them down – bowie compared to jagger say)

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    not a time when opportunists would have seen Labour as the best ticket for advancing some sort of personal agenda,

    The Labour Party is by far the best political party for a barrister who wishes to enter politics and has their eye on high office, as many before Starmer have proved.

    The Tory Party is simply too clogged with public school professionals to make a rapid ascent as likely.

    Believe me being a QC when in a selection process when the other contenders might be a teacher or a postman gives someone a huge advantage in today’s Labour Party.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    The Tory Party is simply too clogged with public school professionals

    Labour too.

    Maybe I should be comparing with Zemmour, though I don’t know if he has accepted a donation from Israel, I doubt it, you just don’t do you.

    It’s great using the words “Marine Le Pen” on this forum, it creates instant reation, however when I read though her 20 points there an equivalent UK voice for all of them and many on the left of the house. Marine gave up on her Frexit promise, Starmer is forging ahead with a Brexit he was against, which is worse? Objectively.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Marine gave up on her Frexit promise, Starmer is forging ahead with a Brexit he was against, which is worse?

    I am surprised that you are happy to draw attention to the fact that a racist right-wing anti-refugee political party now fully accepts EU membership.

    Of course there is nothing particularly surprising that the French National Rally Party should support membership of an organisation which is exclusively for European countries and has at its very heart racist immigration policies which denies equal rights to people from outside Europe.

    Plenty of other racist parties in Europe support EU membership including the French National Rally’s partners in the European Parliament grouping “Identity and Democracy” the neo-nazi parties of Austria and Germany – the Freedom Party and Alternative for Germany Party.

    Plus of course the ruling ultra-conservative racist parties of Hungary and Poland.

    A united Europe in face of the threat to Christian cultural values from Africa and Asia is a long held post WW2 fascist dream. The leader of the British Union of Fascists founded the “Union Movement” which called for integration of Europe into a single political entity. He also helped found the National Party of Europe which was committed to Pan-European nationalism.

    The only fascist party who any sort of electoral success at that time were MSI in Italy. Today the fascist descendants of MSI, Brothers of Italy, are in government in Italy. I don’t believe that Italy’s current fascist Prime Minister has any intention in taking Italy out of the EU.

    So nothing particularly shocking that a racist such as Marine Le Pen should appear more committed to the EU than Keir Starmer.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    denies equal rights to people from outside Europe

    How so?

    We should probably go over this for the hundredth time in the Brexit thread though.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    As you’re delighting in gratuitous throwing shit around: there’s a certain irony in that the Europe hating anti-racist got his Brexit wishes fulfilled thanks to mainly racist voters. 🙂

    I reckon Michel Rocard had it about right and haven’t felt the need to change my views on immigration into Europe since.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    As you’re delighting in gratuitous throwing shit around

    It is you mate that is celebrating the fact that the leader of a racist anti-immigration/refugee far-right party is now a supporter of the the EU, which according you means that the leader of the Labour Party is “worse”.

    I call that throwing shit around.

    And the “Europe hating” allegation is about as valid as the hating Britian or hating America allegations so often levelled at anti-racists.

    I judge people as individuals, not by where they come from. Polish or Nigerian makes no difference to me – the fact that one might come from Europe and the other from Africa is irrelevant.

    MSP
    Full Member

    I think the past few pages are an indication of why brexit needs to be put behind us for now. It will cripple politics in the UK for the next decade and maybe more, we won’t be any closer to re-joining, and nothing else will be done either.

    Hopefully in time with a government that doesn’t take any excuse to be antagonistic with the EU we can rebuild bridges and forge a closer alliance. But there are other things that need to be done as well, and nothing will get done if revisiting brexit is still the biggest game in town.

    pandhandj
    Free Member

    Thought I’d dip back in. Three mins was all I required to remember why I don’t read certain peoples posts.

    Did we ever get the functionality to hide any posts by individuals?

    mcfly
    Free Member

    pandhandj
    Free Member
    Thought I’d dip back in. Three mins was all I required to remember why I don’t read certain peoples posts.

    Did we ever get the functionality to hide any posts by individuals?

    I made the same mistake. Won’t bother again.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    Polish or Nigerian makes no difference to me – the fact that one might come from Europe and the other from Africa is irrelevant.

    Very noble of you, easy sitting where you are where tiny number of immigrants/refugees get across the Channel. You’re slagging off Italian politics when the Italians have been been dealing with virtually all the cross-Med migrants rescued. You’re slagging of German politics when Germany has successfully dealt with what, around half a million Syrian refugees and over a million total over the last five years. Poland has taken I have no idea how many Ukranians.

    I make a distinction because Poland is in Shengen and the EU and Poles are welcome all over Europe if they comply with a few simple rules. However Europe has decided not to welcome all the misery in Nigeria into Europe, only a part of it, its fair share, as Michel Rocard wisely stated.

    I’m aware that immigration beyond what people see as reasonable and acceptble fuels support for the far right parrties you’ve cited. I’d include the current UK government in your list of extreme parties wihen it comes to immigration – Priti Patel’s actions, Windrush etc go beyond anything else in Europe unless you have examples.

    In the case of Nigerians most applications for asylum are turned down most everywhere, however some applications are accepted:

    31,185 people from Nigeria fled in 2021 and applied for asylum in other countries, according to UNHCR data. This corresponds to approximately 0.015% of all residents. The most common destination countries have been Niger, Italy and France. Overall, 81 percent of the asylum applications have been rejected. The most successful have been the refugees in Portugal and Lebanon.

    Politicians have to balance immigration against fueling the far right – too lax on immigration and Italy ends up with a far right government, too tight on immigration and the Uk still gets a far right government, go figure.

    https://www.worlddata.info/refugees-by-country.php

    dazh
    Full Member

    Guys if you don’t like a thread just move on. You don’t have to post to tell everyone that it’s beneath you. 😀

    pandhandj
    Free Member

    @dazh

    Don’t you oppress me! 🤣🤣🤣

    And apologies if I was condescending, not what I intended. I learn a lot about politics from STW and I appreciate the efforts of most, yourself included.

    However, I’m not the first to mention that it can become a wee bit of an ego-fest at times. I guess I just wish people could take a step back at times.

    mcfly
    Free Member


    @dazh
    I think a thread about the next PM is important, but the last pages are ad-hominem attacks, misinformation, squabbling and reuniting Ireland. Do we need another thread for keir?!

    mefty
    Free Member

    Very noble of you, easy sitting where you are where tiny number of immigrants/refugees get across the Channel.

    Net immigration last year was 500,000.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    80 Nigerians. The reply you quote was in reply to Ernie’s Nigerian/polish thing. Context is everything.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    I think the past few pages are an indication of why brexit needs to be put behind us for now. It will cripple politics in the UK for the next decade and maybe more

    I am not sure how indicative of UK politics a thread on STW is. I reckon that for most people the passion behind the EU debate has subsided and it isn’t at the forefront of every political debate.

    Obviously that is not the case for everyone and to be fair Ed takes a pretty extreme position – he very much judges someone entirely on the basis of their attitude towards the EU.

    So we end up with the comments like this with regards to the leader of the Labour Party because he isn’t apparently pro-EU enough : “The more I’ve read about him the more I’ve come to detest him in a way I haven’t detested a politician since Blair.”

    In contrast the leader of a far-right racist party is seen in this sort of light : “Marine Le Pen is little miss goody two shoes compared to Starmer.” Because she now embraces EU membership.

    Most people however, especially now that the UK is no longer in the EU, aren’t obsessed with the issue to that degree.

    I voted for the Green candidate in the local elections earlier this year. It didn’t occurred to me not to because of the Green Party’s policy on the EU. Which btw is this:

    https://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/2022/10/02/greens-call-for-re-joining-the-eu-%E2%80%9Cas-soon-as-political-situation-is-favourable%E2%80%9D/

    Edukator
    Free Member

    And Ernie decides personal slagging off is now the way forward having failed on every other front. Sleep tight.

    dazh
    Full Member

    but the last pages are ad-hominem attacks, misinformation, squabbling and reuniting Ireland

    Yeah, this is a pointless internet forum which people like me use to avoid work and other boring stuff. It really isn’t the Oxford debating society. It’s about the level of a drunken discussion down the pub. Maybe a bit better than that, but not much.

    pandhandj
    Free Member

    You can be very cutting at times dazh! 🤣🤣🤣

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Ernie decides personal slagging off is now the way forward

    There is no “personal slagging off” just an observation that you take an extreme position with regards to people’s attitude towards the EU.

    It is clearly extremely important to you and obvious that you very much judge politicians on that basis. I am surprised that you would suggest otherwise.

    On the other hand claiming that I am “Europe hating” and accusing me of “gratuitous throwing shit around” could reasonably be described as personal slagging off, if that is what concerns you.

    mcfly
    Free Member

    dazh
    Full Member
    but the last pages are ad-hominem attacks, misinformation, squabbling and reuniting Ireland

    Yeah, this is a pointless internet forum which people like me use to avoid work and other boring stuff. It really isn’t the Oxford debating society. It’s about the level of a drunken discussion down the pub. Maybe a bit better than that, but not much.

    Oh and selective quoting 😁

    mefty
    Free Member

    The reply you quote was in reply to Ernie’s Nigerian/polish thing. Context is everything.

    The Nigerian community in the UK is about a quarter of the Polish one so plenty here.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    I wasn’t even talking about immigration. I had been accused of “Europe hating”. I was simply pointing out that continents are irrelevant to me.

    colp
    Full Member

    Net immigration last year was 500,000.

    I thought over half of that is students and other countries don’t count them in their figures?

    mefty
    Free Member

    I thought over half of that is students and other countries don’t count them in their figures?

    Normally it shouldn’t be too significant because they leave so the impact on net immmigration isn’t that great, I think there is a spike as a result of the return to normal post covid but the big drivers are Ukraine, Hong Kong and Afghanistan.

    I wasn’t even talking about immigration. I had been accused of “Europe hating”. I was simply pointing out that continents are irrelevant to me.

    I know, but what can you do!

    dazh
    Full Member

    I had been accused of “Europe hating”. I was simply pointing out that continents are irrelevant to me.

    Probably a bit dramatic but people like Ed who are uncritically and overbearingly enthusiastic about the European ‘project’ remind me of old school british colonialists, banging on about Britannia exporting culture, civilisation and good government to the world. Same goes for those who believe in American hegemony and colonialism. Seems to me we could do with less of that sort of thing in the world, not more.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    The irony is that with an ageing population we will always be dependent on immigrants

    Automation will help in some ways but the fantasy that restricting immigration will force businesses into this and help raise productivity is for the fairies

    we’ve choked off supply of workers from EU so we will have to replace them from elsewhere, we need more workers, those young healthy immigrants will keep coming, honesty from our MPs about this wouldnt go amiss

    its a headache for the racist OAPs and the politicans that depend on their votes

Viewing 40 posts - 16,481 through 16,520 (of 21,680 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.