• This topic has 21,645 replies, 378 voices, and was last updated 1 day ago by kerley.
Viewing 40 posts - 10,801 through 10,840 (of 21,646 total)
  • Sir! Keir! Starmer!
  • kerley
    Free Member

    I think we’re seeing the shine taken off Johnson, rather than people taking to Starmer.

    I did say a few months back on this thread I think that Labour will only win when people are completely fed up with Tory bullshit and it is for the Tories to lose rather than Labour to win. It takes a long time (almost 20 years last time) but it is starting to happen.
    Nowhere near enough yet but by the next election even more people may have woken up a bit more to Brexit mess, Tory lies and corruption, not actually helping them as they hoped etc,. and want rid of them.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    It all seems to be focused on Boris (of the cabinet members anyway). I think they might be gearing up to ditch him.

    Truss’ twitter feed is an endless stream of staged photo ops, which are obviously directed at the membership, she’s ready

    dazh
    Full Member

    Truss’ twitter feed is an endless stream of staged photo ops

    We can only hope. Liz Truss as PM would be the most hilarious and amazing thing. It won’t happen though.

    binners
    Full Member

    I think they might be gearing up to ditch him.

    Thats one thing that the Tories do with the same ruthless lack of sentimentality that they apply to everything. once Johnson starts to look like an electoral liability, he’ll be gone. Its not as if he inspires any loyalty from anyone, being completely devoid of that particular sentiment himself.

    The usual caveat applies though: be careful what you wish for. liz Truss would be absolutely nailed on to succeed him as the membership (who’ll be doing the voting) absolutely love her.

    Imagine her stupid gurning mug stood at the door to number ten. We think we’re an international laughing stock now? (we are) Imagine what a Liz Truss premiership would look like. You can literally hear the cogs whirring when she’s asked a question as the stuff slowly happens in the vacant space between her ears

    dazh
    Full Member

    😃

    Liz Truss!

    dazh
    Full Member

    Don’t know why the Liz truss thread has been closed. I can’t think of a better candidate for their own thread. She’s a comedy genius.

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Well that ^^ clip shows how polite and compassionate a Tory audience is.
    After her first gag falls completely flat the party faithful quickly clock on that they should be amused and applauding.

    After a shaky start it ends with rousing approval from the audience as she declares what a disgrace it is that nine tenths of our pears are imported.

    Had that been a Labour Party audience they probably would have heckled her, shouted out “what a load of rubbish”, and told her to get off.

    And they probably wouldn’t have understood proper British measurements like nine tenths…with their foreign decimal points and percentages.

    binners
    Full Member

    Looks like Starmer is now writing government policy.

    Johnson has just nicked all his proposals, wholesale, on paid work for MPs while he was still announcing them

    It’s going to be interesting to see how this goes down with the snouts-in-the-trough brigade on his own benches

    rone
    Full Member

    Looks like Starmer is now writing government policy

    Not Starmer. 2019 manifesto.

    He’d probably have dropped that too if he’d had half a chance.

    The good ideas came in 2017 and 2019. Starmer doesn’t have any of his own.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Johnson is focusing on “hours” rather than money. As you would expect from someone who approves of doing as little work as possible for as much money as possible. So, politicians could still be bought/influenced by outside interests, just not record too many hours for them.

    Labour’s proposals are quite different. And if they are pretty consistent with those from before Starmer’s shift to being leader, I don’t see anything wrong with that.

    rone
    Full Member

    Labour’s proposals are quite different. And if they are pretty consistent with those from before Starmer’s shift to being leader, I don’t see anything wrong with that.

    Other than the idea was born in the 2019 manifesto. Implementation is another thing.

    Starmer himself recently referred to “our 2019 manifesto” about second jobs.

    It ain’t that hard to come up with something that’s already in your previous manifesto and you’re in opposition.

    So no credit for Starmer as was suggested.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    So, when he’s pushing long standing polices he gets no credit? But if he distances the party from them he gets derided? Well, looks like he can’t win in more ways than one then.

    kerley
    Free Member

    Johnson is focusing on “hours” rather than money. As you would expect from someone who approves of doing as little work as possible for as much money as possible. So, politicians could still be bought/influenced by outside interests, just not record too many hours for them.

    A key point and would make it even more obvious, i.e. an MP getting paid £100,000 for 4 hours work a year. I wonder why anyone would pay that much for 4 hours work…

    cultsdave
    Free Member

    Not Starmer. 2019 manifesto.

    He’d probably have dropped that too if he’d had half a chance.

    The good ideas came in 2017 and 2019. Starmer doesn’t have any of his own.

    So it would be better if he didn’t try to implement this?

    pondo
    Full Member

    Did Johnson just accuse Starmer of corruption in PMQs, then not withdraw it? Pretty noisy, so I might just have missed it – any penalty if he didn’t withdraw it?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    No, he (claims he) said “mish-conduct”. The man’s a joke.

    dissonance
    Full Member

    No, he (claims he) said “mish-conduct”.

    Yes it was a hilarious joke based on Starmer having done some work for Mischon de Reya law firm.
    Top bants there from the combover.

    pondo
    Full Member

    No, he (claims he) said “mish-conduct”. The man’s a joke.

    Ah – very droll. He sounded poorly – hope he gets worse soon.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Just seen the highlights from PMQs, someone put an extra shot of expresso in shot of expresso in starmers coffee today

    Johnson is failing to get a grip on the sleaze thing and Starmer seems much more comfortable on this than anything else

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Both Starmer and Hoyle giving johnson a kicking.
    Made my day.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    You know how Starmer made a point about the Randox documents… in a “we’ll believe it when we see it” way…

    kimbers
    Full Member

    At this rate the Tories will ditch Johnson before the GE, whch actually kinda sucks for starmer because as an ex QC he seems most comfortable going after the sleaze angle- and you know that johnson is in up to his nuts in all kinds of corruption

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    Both Starmer and Hoyle giving johnson a kicking.
    Made my day.

    Caught a clip of Hoyle on the news headlines. Made me happy.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    The sleeper has awakened

    kelvin
    Full Member

    A key point and would make it even more obvious, i.e. an MP getting paid £100,000 for 4 hours work a year. I wonder why anyone would pay that much for 4 hours work…

    Someone who’s far better with words has put it better than either you or I could…

    grum
    Free Member

    Hoyle finally growing a pair with Johnson just furthers the idea the Tories are getting ready to ditch him, IMO.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Now Graham Brady has been dragged into 2nd jobs row, he might well be soliciting those letters

    fwiw I dont think Johnson is done yet, the Daily Mail just fired Jordy Greig who was antibrexit and has been instrumental in attacking Johnson lately, Dacre is heading to OFCOM & his protege is being brought in to replace Greig

    binners
    Full Member

    FFS! Is that it?!

    Even I’m starting to miss Grandads shouty 10 second YouTube rants. At least he meant it.

    There’s a general feeling in the north about this total betrayal, which registers on the scale as ‘apoplectic’ with many people, that we’re having the piss taken out of us and this is the best he can muster

    And this is in the constituencies he needs to win back

    Absolutely ****ing clueless!

    Will the last person out of the Labour Party office kindly turn off the lights. I think they’re done

    grum
    Free Member

    Andy Burnham was quoted on R4 news about it, Starmer wasn’t even mentioned.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    BBC News had Starmer saying levelling up was a Tory luevsnd you couldn’t believe a word they said.

    For once I thought he was getting the message and tone right. Very dependent on how widely it gets reported, but more people probably saw it than read that thst lame Twitter post

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Starmer was looking way more confident on the news earlier than he has in a while.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    See his HR is at least at 95bpm here

    rone
    Full Member

    Oh really? (jokes aside you would’ve at least expected a few weeks of the Tories on an immediate downtrend.)

    Corruption doesn’t stick – maybe for a few days.

    rone
    Full Member

    Absolutely ****ing clueless!

    Will the last person out of the Labour Party office kindly turn off the lights. I think they’re done

    And that’s why Labour polling is crap.

    Starmer doesn’t do politics.

    (He’d be okay helping you sort a spreadsheet for areas with limited cycle infrastructure.)

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    jokes aside you would’ve at least expected a few weeks of the Tories on an immediate downtrend.

    Tbh I’m surprised it lasted that long. Once the Tories backtracked on Paterson I expected them to recover fairly quickly in the opinion polls.

    One greedy individual who has been caught out is unlikely to damage a political party, whatever hue it might be, but the party throwing its weight behind him is likely to cause a public backlash.

    Johnson has corrected his error over Paterson and whilst there might still be a few ripples to be felt I think it is unlikely to cause lasting damage.

    After all the opposition hasn’t changed due to this debacle, and an effective opposition is the only sure way to defeat Johnson/the Tories. Relying on Johnson’s regular blunders to defeat the Tories is a particularly poor strategy.

    Johnson has been performing blunders throughout his political life. It didn’t stop him from becoming leader of the Tory Party, becoming Prime Minister, and easily winning a general election.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Same polling data saw Starmers approval above Johnsons for first time in a long time

    its bascically saying theyre level given margin of error

    now obviously that isnt good enough midterm and while its an improvement on 2019 it likely means a Tory government for the forseeable

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Whilst personal approval polls are great fun the only question that actually matters is, “how would you vote if there was a general election tomorrow?”.

    Btw Priti Patel in fourth place is scary.

    And Liz Truss in fifth just funny.

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Sunak in first place is scary; balance the books = more austerity.
    His personal circumstances mean he’s totally insulated from the effects of any policies which are implemented on his watch.
    He’s equally as corrupt as any other tory – just in a different way.

    rone
    Full Member

    Johnson has been performing blunders throughout his political life. It didn’t stop him from becoming leader of the Tory Party, becoming Prime Minister, and easily winning a general election.

    All of your text rings true Ernie.

    But I’m still expecting a bit of fatigue to gnaw away at their polling eventually. If not now – when?

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    Sunak in first place is scary; balance the books = more austerity.

    Yup.

    Although to be fair all Tory politicians are generally well insulated from the effect of their economic policies. Which is of course why they fear a left-wing Labour government so much.

Viewing 40 posts - 10,801 through 10,840 (of 21,646 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.