Phil – there is context to that statement

dont really think that matters to be honest tj those are the words of a bully ..

not just phil bothered by that mate lots and lots of people read this forum and never post.
shocking attitude from the master of the moral high ground.

Nonk – not a bully at all – far from it. The context does make a difference as clubber pointed out.

I will happily apologise again for any offence caused its a clearly over the top statement. so to anyone offended by that – sorry.

One of these instead of the P for Permier

TandemJeremy – Member
Nonk – not a bully at all – far from it. The context does make a difference as clubber pointed out.

The Fat Lady Sings…

Junkyard – Member
nowt wrong with TJs view on religion- have you seen what Whoppit writes?

Mr Woppit – Member
What about it?

Something about bombs 😆

clowntroll – you joined just to post that?

Could you not have found a clown giving the finger(s)?

an apology is for sure the best response to that to be fair.

Context? Ha, don’t make me laugh. Like the time you misquoted me about Anal rape and continued to do so even though I pointed out you hadn’t read my post properly…

Clowntroll – you do know that won’t count towards keeping your place in the BigS Hit parade?

Could not find a clown or troll.

I want to grow up to be a big hitting d1ck stick so need to start upping my posts now

oh lordy 😯

The fact that this thread has become an apparent irony-vacuum is absolutely brilliant!

You genuinely couldn’t make it up 😆

you didn’t look hard 😉

orobrous binners?

binners i called it at the start it just had to. 😆

irony-vacuum

for simultaneously pressing your carpets and hoovering your shirts? I hope you’ve applied for a patent.

Very good wwaswas, you outside my cave taking photos of me?

Unfortuantely it wont fit next to the usernames so is no good as a special tag for our big hitting heros of webland

EDIT: wwaswas – even better edit

Something small and meaningful perhaps?

Good work Uplink, thread is getting back on track now.

can this be classed as a ‘TJ-thread’ yet? or is that officially 6 pages?

nowt wrong with TJs view on religion- have you seen what Whoppit writes?

What about it?

Well, a lot of what you have to say about religion is pretty inflamatory, ignorant, bigoted and hateful, Woppit. You can hardly argue that you are a ‘moderate’ in that respect now, can you? 😆

I’d be grateful if you can find an example of that.

PS: You’d be the first to respond to that request with actual evidence…

TandemJeremy – Member
Nonk – not a bully at all – far from it. The context does make a difference as clubber pointed out.

I will happily apologise again for any offence caused its a clearly over the top statement. so to anyone offended by that – sorry.

TJ – I didn’t defend your statement at all. I don’t think that context makes it defendable or makes a difference either. Quite the opposite. You’ve misunderstood or misread my post.

I think it shows exactly the sort of posts that bring things down here and put people off posting. That you think it’s a defense to say that other people say worse is very sad.

What I did point out was that I’ve seen others amongst the usual suspect post stuff that’s just as bad and equally nasty, spiteful and plain stupid on the usual here-we-go-again threads so that they should maybe sit on the naughty step for a second and think about it before trying to use it as an opportunity to attack you. He without sin and all that…

My post, for reference:

To be fair to TJ…

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/jesus-christ/page/2#post-1861927

I’ll agree that it’s not a very nice post and unsuprisingly it does show him to be intolerant of other views but read the thread as it goes on and IMO, it makes TJ’s position clearer and rather more akin to the position taken in any kind of political debate by many who’ll no doubt line up with the lynch mob at this point – eg if you don’t agree with my view on X then you are scum/stupid/etc – eg lazy demonising of people.

In summary, it’s poor behaviour but no worse than the usual pathetic name calling that goes on in most of the politial threads. That intolerance is what drags the forum down and for me at least is what the ‘big hitters’ thing is all about.

We need to bring in a meadiator, someone with a bit of clout, someone with vision and clarity. I propose this fella, he’s done a bit..

Otherwise we’re gonna end up bitching and backposting and infighting forevalike..

For sure heated debates good, healthy, enlightening, nay mind changing, but it looks like the underslasses are now picking on the upperclasses..

Not healthy that

It’s ok, I’ve spoken to Sepp Blatter and he says we haven’t got a problem.

clubber – I didn’t say you defended it and I don’t think you did – I said that you had pointed out the context makes a difference. (which may not have been the best choice of words) Not the same thing.

I should have quoted your post but yo now have

TJ there is no ‘context’ which makes what you said ok.

you’ve been prepared to offer an apology (which usually means contrition and an understanding that what was done was wrong) but now you’re defending it again?

I am not defending it, I did not say the context makes it OK. However if seen in context its easier to gain a fuller undertanding.

I meant the apology

Is there nothing I can say without people reading their own interpretations into it and telling me I have said something I have not?

And with that TeeJ… walk away. 8)

yessir

*cracks knuckles*…I think I brought the “Big Hitter” concept to stw – just for a laugh (as ever) – and I hope it has helped bring humour and clarity to the behaviour of posters (myself included).

Blimey…TJ in “taking over the thread without meaning to” SHOCKER!!!!

TandemJeremy – Member
Personally – I think the whole “big hitters” thing terribly sad. Why someone (cynic al? ) felt it necessary to start this and why others think it pertinent escapes me. Whats it all about? feelings of inadequacy? I don’t get it – especially when its most often used by prolific trolls / posters

What’s wrong with me introducing the term? It was purely for laughs, like most of what I say on here. What others do with it, or how difficult you find that, is not my fault/resonsibility.

TandemJeremy – Member
No ironic smile – I do not behave like this, I find the motivation of those that do incomprehensible especially when the term is often used by prolific and argumentative posters

I know I argue a lot, I know I infuriate sometimes and I do sometimes insult folk in retaliation.

I do not have this need to go around putting people down in such a childish manner

You may mean this but can you see how the underlined statements go against it?

Many folk take the **** – me more than many – it’s gonna happen online, we’re not being serious, if you choose to take it all so seriously, then just deal with it and don’t blame us.

Elfinsafety – Member

THREAD CLOSED.

POSTED 17 HOURS AGO # REPORT-POST

LOL – that’s the ultimate big-hitter self-pwnage right there

oh he won’t see that cos of his killfile will he?

No matter…

Welcome back Al. This thread needs you.

I did open the post knowing what I would find

Al on telling yourself its only in fun – we all know better. you are the single most unpleasant person on here. You set out to humiliate, upset and generally wind up people – me amongst others. Yo are widely disliked for it.

STW towers have banned you several times for the “fun” you have being nasty sptiteful and vindictive. I think that says a lot.

The irony meter just atomised itself 😆

Now for more pressing matters- Can anyone lend me a Mint Sauce keyring for a few days?

Abandon thread women and rational people first.

Abandon thread women and rational people first.

Sexist

*inferring that women aren’t rational*