Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Should Have Gone to Specsavers
  • Coyote
    Free Member

    IHN
    Full Member

    🙂 Excellent

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Genius!Love it. 😆

    rkk01
    Free Member

    Class!

    Is this genuine, or a photoshop?

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Looks like a magazine or newspaper page, judging by the margin print and show-through from the reverse.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Or just by the name of the paper and the date one the top my Dear Watson.

    Ah wait no I need glasses it seems.

    ocrider
    Full Member

    Likesalot

    rkk01
    Free Member

    Just been shown a Durex one – even funnier

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Not sure, but I think the Specsavers ad is in the Daily Telegraph, bit difficult to make out, and I can’t zoom on the computer I’m using.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Looks like a name of a paper but when I zoomed in wasn’t sure, could be just because it’s a poor quality photo.

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    “is brill”

    xcgb
    Free Member

    That durex one looks very fake

    edlong
    Free Member

    If the Durex one isn’t fake then I wonder if they’ll give the LOCOG / IOC lawyers any recommendations on which of their products to use when they “do” them.

    fervouredimage
    Free Member

    The Durex one is fake.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Durex is clearly fake it’s a very bad photoshop job, look the outlines around the images and text.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

The topic ‘Should Have Gone to Specsavers’ is closed to new replies.