Kit – Member
Before we get people on about land owners not being wealthy
Well there’s little point, since a few of us have already pointed out that land is not that profitable, yet those with the chips on their shoulders won’t listen.
If all your wealth is tied up in land, then you’re not rich until you sell it…at which point you’re no longer a landowner but you’ll no longer be skint! problem solved! 😀 or atleast passed on to someone else.
I don’t don’t really have a great opinion on land reform tbh, neither am I frothing at the mouth looking to get one over on landowners(tbh having free access is all I need, so I don’t have any motivation to look into it further).
I just don’t think we should be subsidising land ownership. Tbh if we stopped that, that’s probably the best port of call before bringing in laws. Let the market have a go a splitting up the estates firstly, see what happens.