Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)
  • Running fast is bad for you
  • molgrips
    Free Member

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-31095384

    Ok fair enough, I can understand that training too hard can put strain on you and all that. But they think the optimum speed to run at is 5mph. That’s 12 minute miles! FFS that’s ridiculous!

    imnotverygood
    Full Member

    You’ll be ok molgrips 😉

    Edric64
    Free Member

    Try being the sweeper at a Parkrun I regularly sweep up 42min 5km “runners “They are in no danger of 12min pace

    nickc
    Full Member

    Is that not actually walking?

    Rockape63
    Free Member

    I think that is based on not being a ‘Runner’. Trying to run fast when unfit and in poor condition IS bad for you unless you are 6-16 years of age…although looking at some teenagers these days running fast might actually be the end of ’em!

    molgrips
    Free Member

    You’ll be ok molgrips

    Lol no, I need to slow down – even this lumbering oaf can easily beat 12m/mile!

    There has to be some other factor at work in this study. No way is running at say, 9m pace going to shorten your life. Must be something else.

    Edric64
    Free Member

    Yes .then they often drop out after 2 laps and I get to run nearly a lap to sweep up the next slowest

    glasgowdan
    Free Member

    Jogging that slow is horrendous on the joints. A good canter at 5-6m/m pace opens up the gait to a natural style and involves much less harsh vertical motion, I.e it’s better for you (once you’ve got fit enough to cope of course!)

    Edric64
    Free Member

    5/6 min a mile or km? most good runners in my club dont hold 6 min mile pace

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    Theres plenty of ways in which more exercise or more intensive exercise can be bad for you – but it depends on what your timeframe is. Mortality rates will be better for people who exercise moderately throughout their life than for people who are inactive. Intensive exercise can result in wear, tear and injury which in time can curtail your ability to exercise at all. So the net result of that exercise, if you look at the whole of life, is mortality rates that are no better, or worse than not exercising at all. Bad knees – bad news in later life.

    With the study linked to though and a 12 year time frame – unless the sample set were all very old or very ill then hardly any of the people in the study should have died. The numbers in either part of the trial (moderate or intensive exercisers) who died must surely have been insignificant. The article doesn’t say how they died either – its obviously a study thats been cherry picked for a BHF press release – were encouraged to assume that people would have died of heart disease and similar chronic conditions. Maybe faster runners are more likely to be hit by a bus.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Yes it would be good to see what the causes of death were.

    rene59
    Free Member

    Yes it would be good to see what the causes of death were.

    Running into things. The slow coaches have plenty time to react.

    glasgowdan
    Free Member

    Mile. I’m not saying thats marathon pace, but I was in a training group that would do 800m reps in 2:15 and evening club races won around 14:45-15:00. Most folk can do 300-400m reps at 6 min mile pace. This is what I consider running, opening up the stride to an efficient smooth style.

    Edric64
    Free Member

    Bloody hell must be a fast club our 5km record is 15.52 our parkrun record is 15.03 by a world class duathlete !

    Caher
    Full Member

    oh good – my knees are so knackered i walk fast rather than run nowadays.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    This is what I consider running, opening up the stride to an efficient smooth style.

    I completely understand that.. it feels far better to properly run than to plod along.. problem is I can only keep it up for half a mile 🙂 When I had somewhere dead flat and smooth to do 800m reps I managed about 2m50 as a PB I think.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Yes it would be good to see what the causes of death were.
    Running into things. The slow coaches have plenty time to react.

    Brilliant 😆

    glasgowdan
    Free Member

    Edrik, it was a competitive athletics club. Almost all the clubs around Scotland and UK have runners that can do around 15 min 5ks. This is the club records for the one I was in http://inverclydeac.weebly.com/senior-records.html

    Edric64
    Free Member

    Not us over 400 members and the biggest club in Wiltshire !!

    Edric64
    Free Member

    That is a fine and impressive set of records there !!

    Edric64
    Free Member
    brooess
    Free Member

    If that bbc story has correctly reported the findings of the study then how come professional athletes aren’t dying in their hundreds, and club runners? I suspect there’s some misreporting/misinterpretation going on in there somewhere…

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    Looks like bollocks to me. I accept that massive amounts of exercise might be bad but 4h per week doesn’t seem much. Maybe many of these runners were actually doing 12h or something, and they are the ones that suffer? Or else they took up running because of a health scare?

    Oh, I just looked and it is bollocks. The uncertainties on the estimate are bigger than the estimate itself (for the relative risk at high levels of exercise).

    http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleID=2108914

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Which would support what macruiskeen said.. if very few had actually died.

    manderson
    Free Member

    Always worth visiting nhs behind the headlines when this sort of story makes the press…
    http://www.nhs.uk/news/2015/02February/Pages/Strenuous-jogging-as-bad-as-doing-no-exercise-claim.aspx

    manderson
    Free Member

    “For example, there were only 36 people who were classed as “strenuous” joggers, and only two of these people died. These small numbers mean that we cannot say with certainty that there is definitely no difference between people in the most active jogging categories and the people who are sedentary.”

    IanMunro
    Free Member

    Even the editorial in the journal it was published in thinks it was bollocks.
    http://content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleID=2108913

    terrahawk
    Free Member

    I assume Ron Hill didn’t take part in this ‘study’.

    will
    Free Member

    13:58 5k. Wow.

    nickc
    Full Member

    innit.

    I just scraped under 20mins (19.57) once on a v flat milton keynes 5k, I can’t tell you happy I was about that, then there are runners who can set of 5 mins after me, and still beat me to the line!!!! 😯

    66deg
    Free Member

    The hardest races i ever did were 5000m track events mid lancs league,without any hills there was no change of pace and it was crushing being lapped by the winner and i ran them in 16.30 so not too shabby.

    I just scraped under 20mins (19.57)

    So much better than 20.01. it’s all in the mind.

    nickc
    Full Member

    I’ve done so many 20 somethings…always set off too fast, and organisers of races invariably have “hill of doom” at the end just to make them ‘fun’

    16 and a half is legging it!

    jaymoid
    Full Member

    “Too much jogging ‘as bad as no exercise at all'”

    To quote Stephen Fry:

    But of course too much is bad for you.
    “Too much” of anything is bad for you, you blithering tw47.
    That’s what “too much” means, too much water would be bad for you.
    Obviously, “too much” is precisely that quantity which is excessive, that’s what it means.
    Jesus.

    from: Fry and Laurie sketch

    TerryWrist
    Free Member

    Edric 64 – Member
    Try being the sweeper at a Parkrun I regularly sweep up 42min 5km “runners “They are in no danger of 12min pace

    Well with that kind of “support” I suppose there’s no danger of them wanting to try and run faster, not surprised they drop out. Though looking at the BBC headlines maybe you’re doing them a favour then by not getting them to run quicker?

    I thought the idea of Parkrun was to encourage people who were a bit wary of running clubs, but can see now it’s a way of weeding out joggers rather than runners.

Viewing 35 posts - 1 through 35 (of 35 total)

The topic ‘Running fast is bad for you’ is closed to new replies.