I’ve been away for 10 days, so what were your ‘excuses’ for losing to the Argies, then a (by your own inference) poor England team? I hope the flight home’s a good one!
Actually I have been away,and it was a bus,not a flight.The Argentina game I thankfully didn’t see,obviously you didn’t either.Still, the hammering you gave them gives you bragging rights. Lots of whining over the citing to deflect from the performance.
It would only involve looking over a couple of pages,so please show me the quote where I have suggested we would beat Argentina,or England? Or my excuses for losing to either.Since you ask; here is my excuse for Scotland…We are not good enough,we can’t score tries.
What is yours for England? Either England were/are poor, or Scotland are a better team than anybody gives them credit for.I know which one I lean towards. If it makes you comfy,trot out the same Scotland raising their game against England line.Which would sound like an excuse…
This is too good;
a (by your own inference) poor England team?
Do you think this is a GOOD England team? Honestly?
Here is why I think England are poor; in 2003 England were magic,2007 they were just at the same level as the SH. 2011 you are not confident of being better than the rest of the NH. That was demonstrated yesterday, for all your bravado,England led for less than a min against the poorest of the Home Nations.And worse than that,turned over ball in scoring situations far too often,failed to convert pressure,in a way the 2003 side would never have done, against both us and Argentina. England also creaked in the scrum,(against a pack that has had pelters) and were fairly predictable behind it.NZ/Saffers would have been 20 points up at half time,even without Carter.That is why I think England are a poor side this time round.Feel free to refute the above argument.I am interested in how you think England can improve.
Carter; deserves to play in a WC final, shame.