Question the ref, fine, swear, fine. Swear at ref, not fine slapped wrist.
That’s one of the stupider things I’ve heard you say and that’s saying something.
If racism drove the ban what drove Hartleys red or Parisse’s?
I don’t know about Parrisse’s red but to me it doesn’t look like it involved dangerous play.
In Hartley’s case he called the ref a **** cheat and it didn’t involve dangerous play. Forget the swearing, calling the ref a cheat is enough to get you sent off. If you call the ref a cheat you’ve gone beyond questioning his authority and you are saying he cannot referee the game. At that point you have to go off.
I’m a strong believer in respecting the referee’s authority. If the scrum half does an american football pass to the winger who is three feet in touch who then drops the ball, scoops it up, and puts it down a foot short of the line and the referee gives the try then tough shit, it’s a try and you don’t get to question him on the field. Any back chat should be 10 meters and a card if it continues.
The exception to this is dangerous play. If you believe the referee is allowing dangerous play you have a duty to speak up. Sinckler chose the wrong way to do so but he was right to bring it to the ref’s attention and he was proved correct. It was dangerous play and the ref had missed it.
Williams’ showed the worst kind of disrespect towards the ref. He didn’t make a technical infringement, he made a really dangerous charge and could have caused serious injury. He was completely in the wrong, the ref was completely in the right, and he felt the need to challenge his authority anyway.
If a player has that little respect for the safety of his opponents and that little respect for the person who ensures that safety standards are followed then he should have some extra time off to consider his actions.
Instead he was given a reduction for showing remorse.
Anyway, I’m off to bed now.