Englands attack was very good for a change, how can you say it wasn’t? Loads of variety, Back three and Tuigali inside and outside Ford taking it up, the threat and use of Fords kick over the top, the kick chase produced results and the talisman Sexton was put under pressure. Essentially England picked out the less experienced Irish players and forced them into mistakes, whilst holding the line.
Sure there are many more spectacular tries scored in the world but that was not a bad attacking game by any means, and let’s remember Ireland are not a bad side at all. The very fact all the off the ball mentioned in the last few posts has happened is a sig of a team desperate to slow the attack.
However, the problem with England is despite all the talk of leadership they play to a formula. When its right as it was on Sunday and against the AB’s we look really good, but when its wrong or nullified there’s no changing it and we get the SA game or second half of Sunday. Essentially on Sunday England kept on doing the same as usual, and lost out to Ireland because they changed their game plan slight to stop bashing Englands defence through the backs and to get the ball into Englands half and use the forwards. Ireland adapted, England didn’t.
If we play the first half game against Wales with a strong defensive, we’ll win. If we play the second half game, Wales will win.
The other thing I thought I spotted was that the English defensive line was much more lacsidasical in the last 20 mins giving Ireland more space to play in.