What it says

<http://brightonmtb.org/&gt;

Cheers

http://brightonmtb.org/2010/11/22/on-one-456-steel-ti-review/

there you go Mike 🙂

Thanks

Given up trying to post links on here.

Cheers

Good review! Is that the new Ti 456 frame, or the older Lynskey one, can’t see any pics of it?

Not sure of the 18″ frames as described, but on the 20″ frames the geometry is slightly different.

I only noticed when I trashed my Ti frame and built up my steel frame with the exact-same bits the seat ended up at a different angle…

Hi Mr Pro

The 456Ti was bought in 2008, it is the Lynskey one.

Have a look round brightonmtb.org and you will find a couple of reviews of the 456Ti (2008) and Cotic Soda.

Cheers

Interesting that some thought it was a good review. I thought it was pap.

It attempts to compare (at least by the title) the same frames in different materials and ends up reviewing complete bikes that are clearly very different.

Seems like they lost sight of what they were trying to do.

I was just wondering how many times the reviewer was going to be able to use the word geometry, wonder if he actually knows what it means.

Hi Mike, on a different topic would you mind dropping me an email to dan1502 at f2s.com regarding your US contact. It’d be much appreciated.

Hi Dan

I can’t use the e-mail in your profile.

Please contact me at info@brightonmtb.org and I’ll reply.

Cheers

Mike

Hi Mike

I’ve sent you an email.

Many thanks

Dan