So some of you may have spotted my earlier post asking for feedback on different suspension designs for XC racing and some help designing a frame- here and I have finally come up with something resembling a rocky mountain element as I’m yet to find a significantly bad review on them – and they look pretty sweet too!
But the one thing that has come up about them is that they use 165x38mm shocks, and that although they are good for a little weight saving over a longer design (eg 200×50), and give me the ability to make the frame a bit more compact, I have heard that they suffer on small bump compliance and generally aren’t as good as a longer shock. I can see this being true as you would have to run a higher pressure to get the right amount of sag, but is this actually true?
I know there won’t be anyone out there that has been able to use both in the same frame due to frames being designed around a specific shock, but has anyone got or ridden two similarish bikes but with different size shocks (preferably of the same design) – and can give me a definitive answer if longer shocks are better?