Reach & Inline Seatposts (Gravel Content)
Thinking of changing my gravel bike. New frame has a reach 4mm longer, but toptube 15mm longer. As I already run a shortish stem, presumably I can pull it back with an inline post? Current bike is layback. Any benefits/drawbacks of this?Posted 1 year ago
It sounds like the STA is the thing you want to look at and if you know that on both bikes and if you know your saddle height then it is easy to work out the horizontal difference in saddle position between the two. It would be better that way as top tube length could be a little misleading. Also, what is the amount of layback on your current post?Posted 1 year ago
New frame has a reach 4mm longer, but toptube 15mm longer.
Then your new frame’s seat tube angle is approx 1 degree slacker, at a guess*. An inline post usually moves the saddle fwd 10-15mm, also roughly equivalent to a 1 to 1.5 degree steeper seat angle. So, yes. Likely to put your saddle in very similar position relative to BB.
*is stack is similar between them – if not, reach may be only +4mm but by the time your bars are set up where you want them the BB to bar reach might be more or less different, but so may the bike’s handling and weight distribution needs etc ie at that point you’re best just getting it to feel right rather than measure everything within +/-5mm.Posted 1 year ago
So frame dimensions:
Frame TopT. ST. STA. HTA. STACK. REACH.
FrameA. 535. 500. 74.5. 71. 538. 386
FrameB. 550. 510. 74. 71.5. 568. 390
currently have around 20mm of layback on current seatpostPosted 1 year ago
On a gravel bike wouldn’t you want to setup the saddle properly for pedalling then adjust the length by changing the stem?Posted 1 year ago
On a gravel bike wouldn’t you want to setup the saddle properly for pedalling
Isnt that true for all bikes?Posted 1 year ago
pfft, shows what you know, my DH bikes were always well out of linePosted 1 year ago
pfft, shows what you know, my DH bikes were always well out of line
DH bikes dont tend to get pedalled much from the seat so we can count them out, also BMX. Anyway just asking, the norm is to set the saddle for pedalling not for reach, right?Posted 1 year ago
If you’re sitting down and pedalling a lot, yes.
Anyway, the difference between those two frames is going to mean thinking more about getting the bars in the right place than the saddle (which you can probably just slide forward 6mm or so). The seat angle’s only 0.5deg different but there’s 30mm of extra stack to deal with.
How many spacers do you have under the stem, and what length/angle stem?Posted 1 year ago
So current bike is Planet X Full Monty in small. 100mm stem, 30mm spacers. My Cross bikes and road bikes have always been on the smaller side, it just works for me.
the new frame I’m looking at is the Reilly Gradient. I’ve always had a titanium itch that needs scratching and the Reilly is truly stunning. The frame sizes I posted earlier are the medium. The small would be a direct comparison to the Full Monty, but I’ve found a medium for sale. To add to the confusion, the tests I’ve seen have a layback post, the Reilly builds appear to be inline posts!Posted 1 year ago
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.