Well, I’m pretty sure my opinion on singletrack is going to be required to stand up in court, but your point is taken.
I would edit my post to say “imo” but it’s too late now. Either way, I’m inclined to think that some of the people who I’ve discussed this with are telling the truth. Either that or I have to accept that all of them were lieing, and I struggle with that.
I’m not moving any goal posts, my point remains. I believe that too many people are claiming/given benefits when they’re not needed. We need to address this with cuts. Please point out where I deviated from this stance.
it is no longer about your neighbour but all claimants now – as you dont get subtle do you
I’m very capable of “getting” subtle. I don’t get “missing the point entirely”. My original post was not about all claimants, and neither were my later ones. They were all about people that don’t need to claim, but do because it’s available and they can. My neighbours was an example. They chose not to work and to claim because they can. I used them as an example. Perhaps that was too subtle for you?