If you’re at a meeting and your name isn’t used, how do you know who they are referring to? It’s also handy if you have some sort of recording going on for minute-taking.
I can’t remember names for the life of me.. but I can remember where and I really need to practice this (using thename over and over) in order to remember and appear less rude.
I can’t remember patient’s names, but I remember them by literally making a mental journey from the practice to their house..THEN I remember them.
It’s to establish rapport. In that ‘Peter, you are so important to me/this, I’m referring to you by name. You’re not an anonymous droid but a special little diamond etc’…
If it’s overdone, it can seem contrived and annoying.
Drac, I agree with you. Like Kelvin, its not something I’m good at so tend not to do it. I actually find it quite useful when others do it as it reminds me people’s names. Bfw, I’m not sure why it would be perceived as passive agressive unless you think she is suggesting your weren’t paying attention. Teams calls with cameras off or where I’m presenting and can’t see the others faces mean I am more likely to name people (esp if I have the advantage of a participant list on screen!). Scotroutes might also have a point if there’s any kind of transcript, then it won’t be able to judge who a comment was directed at from eye contact / body language alone.
If you’re at a meeting and your name isn’t used, how do you know who they are referring to? It’s also handy if you have some sort of recording going on for minute-taking.
I don’t think the op is objecting to the use of names per se. At the start of every sentence is quite unnatural sounding and can be quite irritating in a “give me you attention so i can tell you what to do Colin” its not very inclusive and can be a bit confrontational if intentional.
A lack of confidence perhaps from the PM Or poor active listening or straight up not paying attention meaning the PM os having to?
Engaging dynamic conversation makes a massive difference in a meeting especially if you are running it.
Yeah when I was a PM I would try and use peoples names a few times in a conversation to help me remember first time I met them. Always made it a natural part of a sentence though. Rarely started each sentence with the persons name as that sounds instructional and almost aggressive which is the last thing a PM wants to come across as. Lead vs Manage etc
If she continues to do it after a couple of meetings where she can now clearly remember everyone’s name then its just badly implemented low level management training stolen from the US. She probably thinks she’s being authoritative and direct yet personable, but basically comes across as that really irritating boss from the grammerly ads.
Could be rapport, could be for establishing power, who knows.
But I actually appreciate this, and do it myself before posing a question to someone. Firstly so that they know I’m talking to them, and so that I get a response from them.
My manager does the opposite, she asks a question, then the name, and then gets annoyed when people don’t know she’s asked the question. I understand that she probably expects everyone to be 100% involved in the conversation, but its just not realistic.
I always assume they’ve been on ‘the course’ that a certain subset of managerial bellends must attend, and have been told its a way to assert dominance/authority over a conversation…
Lots of cabinet ministers seem to do it when being interviewed…
It’s a trick they’ve learnt off some horrible business book to ingratiate themselves with you because everyone’s favourite word is their own name.
How to win friends and influence people.
There is definitely some truth in it, but if overdone it is really grating. I think Brits are much more easily annoyed by this kind of thing than Americans.
My manager does the opposite, she asks a question, then the name, and then gets annoyed when people don’t know she’s asked the question. I understand that she probably expects everyone to be 100% involved in the conversation, but its just not realistic.
The problem with names first is you then kill everyone elses interest.
I don’t know why it sticks in my mind but one of the guys who got convicted for killing Stephen Lawrence was interviewed by Martin Bashir and kept using this trick of saying ‘Martin’ before every answer.
Seemed like he’d be told to do it by his solicitor or something because he thought it would engratiate himself to everyone and make him seem more human.
It was probably a control thing I think as well, but he wasn’t smart enough to pull it off.
It almost jumped out as a tactic and made him seem the complete opposite of what he’d intended.
+1 for name remembering technique. Though I’ll never use it again after reading that it annoys some people so much they’ll start a new topic about it on a bike forum.
Until someone else starts a “people that can’t remember your name” thread.
It would irritate me so thank god it hasn’t happened. Comes across a bit unhinged so probably from a management course or one of those ridiculous self help books. I also don’t like being called by my full name and really don’t like being called Sir or Mr. So if somebody called me Mr FunkmasterP at the start of every sentence I’d probably explode with rage.
I worked briefly at direct line in customer services and using the customers name repeatedly was a targeted part of the call script. I didn’t stay long as even though I was good at solving peoples problems and got through calls quickly I only use people names if I need to let them know I’m taking to them. They made it clear that I had to start doing it or I’d be put on a performance review. I told them I wasn’t going to and left.