Home › Forum › Bike Forum › Oh dear Danny Macaskill – please don't do the Playboy Mansion thing :-(
- Oh dear Danny Macaskill – please don't do the Playboy Mansion thing :-(
I’d imagine that there is a substantial “monetary incentive” involved.
Posted 3 years agoAlways a money shot.
Posted 3 years agoLadies and bikes I love them both… The two combined for me is not a problem
Posted 3 years agoThat video would have 2 of my favourite things in it
Posted 3 years agoplus bikes?
Posted 3 years agoOh really!!! That’s disgusting….urmm…when’s the video going to be released?
Posted 3 years agoStill, classier than a razzle pile-up.
Posted 3 years agoYup pretty lame
Posted 3 years agoI’m a guy and I like women.
I also think it’s lame. Playboy, Hugh Hefner and the ‘playboy mansion’ are naff and belong in the last century – along with page three. It does nothing for the sport (where female participation is already low) and it appeals to the lowest common denominator male attitude.
Sad lads huddling round a PC, rubbing their thighs going huh,huh,hu, gurlz, huh, huh, huh, boobz. That’s what this is, no more, no less.
Posted 3 years agoSo, maybe I’ll be in a minority but I’m really disappointed to read (https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152263533303225) that Danny Macaskill has agreed to shoot a video at the Playboy Mansion.
Surely he knows better than this? Surely he knows not all his followers/fans are 13 year old boys??
Rachel
Posted 3 years agoTacky. Shame…
Posted 3 years agoGigity, gigity……
Posted 3 years agoBy the hashtag I’d suggest it has more to do with Redbull(sh*ts) marketing strategy than Danny.
Posted 3 years agoThat’s it. He’s out of the Clique 🙂
Posted 3 years agoNot impressed.
In balance, therefore I demand that Matt Hunter comes round to my house. 😆
Posted 3 years agoJamesy- I doubt Redbull are holding a gun to his head. He has choices over what is appropriate and what isn’t…
Posted 3 years agoNot cool. Not even remotely cool. Pretty crap really. -10 on the Fonz scale.
I know he’s nowt but a lad from Skye who’s nifty on pushbike but I had him on a higher plane than this.
My 4yo daughter loves watching Danny’s videos, we may avoid this one.
Posted 3 years agoMaybe it will be better to pass comment once we’ve seen the film. I doubt there will be any flesh on show as his sponsors wouldn’t want that.
Posted 3 years ago
Neither would any self respecting human being. If you want the sex industry its easy enough to find online.
Beautifully dressed ladies as a backdrop in an iconic location can hardly be a bad thing.I agree, let’s see what is actually released but the Facebook postings so far are enough to push this past the mark for me.
“Beautifully dressed ladies as a backdrop in an iconic location can hardly be a bad thing.”
Women make a lovely backdrop…discuss.
Posted 3 years agoBeautifully dressed men are allowed in to the mansion too so maybe I should have said beatiful people.
Posted 3 years agoLet us men of STW break down the gates of the mansion 🙂
Posted 3 years agoMaybe it will be better to pass comment once we’ve seen the film.
Why wait when you can whinge and be offended before you even know what its going to contain, maybe 2 of the whingers could get together and complain to ofcom 😆
Posted 3 years agolarrydavid wrote:I’m a guy and I like women.
I also think it’s lame. Playboy, Hugh Hefner and the ‘playboy mansion’ are naff and belong in the last century – along with page three. It does nothing for the sport (where female participation is already low) and it appeals to the lowest common denominator male attitude.
Sad lads huddling round a PC, rubbing their thighs going huh,huh,hu, gurlz, huh, huh, huh, boobz. That’s what this is, no more, no less.THIS
it will be better to pass comment once we’ve seen the film.
Aye Hugh is indeed an unknown quantity and we know nothing of his mansion or the backdrop there…we are in the dark completely here 😕
maybe 2 of the whingers could get together and complain to ofcom
a joke about someone being being found guilty of being racist BRILLIANT that is ssssooooo funny
Posted 3 years agoIf you lot got the chance to be paid a **** load of money to go ride your bike at the playboy mansion I bet you’d jump at the chance. I certainly would. He’s living the dream!
Posted 3 years agolarrydavid +1. A bit sad given the original, inspirational video. He was just trying not to fall off the fence back then…
Posted 3 years agoSexy half naked women are so last century and have no place modern society.
I don’t think I know anyone who admires the female form never mind uses porn.I should imagine since the advent of the internet the porn industry has all but disappeared , mucky blighters.
As there is clearly no demand for it this century.And a young female cyclist would not sink so low as to involve herself in titilation.
Posted 3 years ago
No prudes pleaseI’m offended and I’ll watch any footage to ensure my children don’t accidentally witness anything untoward.
“Wow, he’s doing a no-handed fakey superman”
Posted 3 years agoI can’t actually believe anyone is getting hot under the collar about this.
Oh, hold on, it’s STW – of course they are.
I’ll check with Mrs STR later if she’s offended. I’m sure she
Posted 3 years agowill becouldn’t care less.Women that disapprove of this sort of thing are ugly and very bitter.
Men that disapprove of this sort of thing are weak minded closet homosexuals.
Posted 3 years agoIt’s an interesting one, in a similar way Air NZ has got some complaints about their inflight safety video with the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit models. The missus even thought that it was in good taste and with humour but others disagreed.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQDip9V49U0[/video]To avoid looking like one of those over quoted idiots talking about the Brass Eye spoof without watching it I’ll wait to see what it’s all about first.
Posted 3 years agoBunny hopping.
There are bigger things in the world to be concerned about right now.
Posted 3 years agoI really can’t see an issue. Should we form some sort of moral police to go around making women cover up?
Posted 3 years agoI had to replay the first 20 seconds of that video… I thought she said ‘For dickheads, we have been…’
Posted 3 years agoah the Kiwi accent bro
Posted 3 years agoI blame Adam for eating that apple, or is that the church for declaring nakedness a sin?
Posted 3 years agoCan’t see a problem with it myself
Posted 3 years agoPhone rings: hello Danny fancy jumping over some semi naked chicks with massive cans?
Danny M: yes.
That’s how the phone call went in my imagination. Does the op really think some manly hebredian is going to turn down the chance to go see Hefner and his girls!?!?
Posted 3 years agoI really can’t see an issue. Should we form some sort of moral police to go around making women cover up?
That’s not really the issue though, is it? What is, is the objectification of women for commercial ends, and that isn’t right.
I thought the UK had got past the point of low-grade sexism, but this Twitter feed suggests otherwise.
Posted 3 years agoThat’s not really the issue though, is it? What is, is the objectification of women for commercial ends, and that isn’t right.
Haha have you seen any adverts!!???
Posted 3 years agoHaha have you seen any adverts!!???
Yes. Still doesn’t make it appropriate though, does it?
Posted 3 years agoI’m pretty sure the playboy bunnies choose to do it for the cash, they are not slaves and are not forced to wear a certain style of dress in fear of being killed by rocks if they don’t adhere to some made up law.
Playboy may not be your style of choosing, but I’m sure DMac would front flip off a gay and lesbian hessian turban factory roof it looked good on camera and he got payed well, before hes injured enough that his (relatively short) career ends.
The majority of men are attracted to attractive girls, Dannys a big boy and can make his own decisions and I’m sure you will all watch it anyway and bank a few for later.
Posted 3 years agoscruff – Member
I’m pretty sure the playboy bunnies choose to do it for the cash, they are not slaves and are not forced to wear a certain style of dress in fear of being killed by rocks if they don’t adhere to some made up law.
Playboy may not be your style of choosing, but I’m sure DMac would front flip off a gay and lesbian hessian turban factory roof it looked good on camera and he got payed well, before hes injured enough that his (relatively short) career ends.
The majority of men are attracted to attractive girls, Dannys a big boy and can make his own decisions and I’m sure you will all watch it anyway and bank a few for later.
+1 bar some poor spelling and punctuation.
Posted 3 years agoHe is only doing it hoping to get an invite into the sex room.
Reminds me my sex room could do with a lick of paint.
Posted 3 years agoCan’t say I’m bothered by this, I think any heterosexual man getting offended at the idea of partially clothed women is probably a hypocrite.
My wife is very into the Everyday Sexism twitter feed and while some of it is actually sexism, a lot of it is just people being rude, which they would do regardless of whether or not it was to do with women.
Posted 3 years agoSubscribe For Just £1.50
Subscribers see fewer ads and can join in the conversation in our forum and post comments on stories. You also get access to the latest issue of Singletrack magazine. Click here for more
The topic ‘Oh dear Danny Macaskill – please don't do the Playboy Mansion thing :-(’ is closed to new replies.