Viewing 40 posts - 921 through 960 (of 1,579 total)
  • New Labour leader/ direction
  • squirrelking
    Free Member

    I’d say his finger is closer to the pulse than yours. Or have you missed the amount of folk not wanting to get involved in another US led middle eastern adventure?

    Take a step back and take the blinkers off for a minute, you’re as ideologically blinded as the rest of them.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Well, with Unison backing Starmer, I think that means Lewis won’t get his Union nomination (and no Union nomination means that realistically you don’t even get to run)… probably for the best… but it’s a shame he won’t get the leadership campaign to try and prove himself for a leading front bench role.

    binners
    Full Member

    Magic Grandad has his finger on the pulse? Yeah, right. Here’s a pretty accurate description of his performance today by the political sketch writer of that famously right-wing mouthpiece The Independent. The title itself sums him up…

    Jeremy Corbyn just delivered a masterclass in being the worst party leader in political history

    He seems to be having some kind of bet with himself to see just how much damage he can do to the Labour Party before his fingers are prized away from the leadership

    ransos
    Free Member

    When do we hear who the unions have blocked from running?

    The biggest union in the country is backing Starmer. I’m sure all those who claimed that a union stitch-up would deliver RLB as leader will be here soon to admit they were wrong.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    I’m sure all those who claimed that a union stitch-up would deliver RLB as leader will be here soon to admit they were wrong.

    Who said that? Some people pointed out that the union leaders don’t get a block vote any more, I then pointed out that the new nomination process means that they now have major say in who gets to the voting stage.

    It’s who gets blocked by the unions that’s interesting. I doubt RLB will be, I’d be surprised if the Unite thumbs up goes to anyone else, but you never know.

    binners
    Full Member

    RLB was always going to get the unite vote delivered by Comrade Len.

    The leadership of Unite is fortunately not representative of the union movement generally. They’re not all stuck in some stasis of 1970’s arrested development.

    We’ve got 11 more weeks of Corbyn yet, and on the strength of today’s head-in-the-sand debacle, the idea of any ‘continuity’ candidate to that will look less and less appealing.

    So by grimly hanging on he might actually be doing the party a favour.

    The scale of the electoral thumping they’ve just received, and the reasons why, does seem to be sinking in with all but the most terminally deluded, like Rebecca ‘ten out of ten for Jeremy’ Long-Bailey

    dantsw13
    Full Member

    Prentis always comes over well, as opposed to McClusky……

    Starmer could well be the man for the middle ground.

    dazh
    Full Member

    Boom!

    kelvin
    Full Member

    More like…

    “Boom… boom!”

    BB

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Gardiner’s been considering how well he’s come across over the last few years and thought to himself, “yeah, I’ll go for that. What could go wrong?”

    big_n_daft
    Free Member

    Got to be Gardiner and Burgon for the full package

    binners
    Full Member

    Not so fast!

    Surely Ian Lavery has still time yet

    And Dianne Abbott has been suspiciously quiet…

    olddog
    Full Member

    If Bazza is the answer what the **** is the question?

    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Len is all over twitter basically calling Goodall a liar, saying Gardner is overseas and isn’t standing.

    olddog
    Full Member

    ransos
    Free Member

    The leadership of Unite is fortunately not representative of the union movement generally.

    Yeah, it’s only the biggest union in Britain.

    imnotverygood
    Full Member

    Yeah, it’s only the biggest union in Britain.

    & all those members agree entirely with what Len says

    rone
    Full Member

    You know Binners I’m only providing this sort of thing for light entertainment. Not because if this was JC or DA we you would be going on about this for weeks as evidence of poor leadership.

    dazh
    Full Member

    Barry Gardiner is a very interesting character. Voted for the the Iraq war, nominated David Miliband for the leadership, once told Gordon Brown to resign because he wasn’t enough of a blairite, and has close ties to the Modi regime. He should stick to being the shadow minister for going on question time.

    Good answer from Lewis though on the ridiculous ‘would you be willing to kill millions of innocent people question’.

    binners
    Full Member

    Yeah, it’s only the biggest union in Britain.

    The reason people like comrade Len target union leadership as a route to influence within the labour party is because not many people bother voting in union leadership elections. He was elected last time, very narrowly, on a turnout of 12% of the Unite mebership. Hardly some ringing endorsement is it?

    How do you think he’s have got on standing for election as an MP? Yet there he is. At the top table of the party, esentially dictating policy. And repelling voters, obviously. Every time he opens his mouth, the Tory vote share goes up 5%

    ransos
    Free Member

    The reason people like comrade Len target union leadership as a route to influence within the labour party is because not many people bother voting in union leadership elections. He was elected last time, very narrowly, on a turnout of 12% of the Unite mebership. Hardly some ringing endorsement is it?

    I’m not a member of Unite so I don’t know why you’re aiming that comment at me.

    binners
    Full Member

    It wasn’t aimed at you comrade. I was just pointing out the depth of Comrade Len’s democratic mandate.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Stop using “Comrade” please Binners!

    Oh, hang on…

    ransos
    Free Member

    It wasn’t aimed at you comrade. I was just pointing out the depth of Comrade Len’s democratic mandate.

    Replied to me but not aimed at me. *reaches for chinny reckon gif*

    Anyway, for everyone else, I think the influence of the union vote is much overstated for the following reasons:

    1. Elections are now one member one vote (the bloc vote was scrapped)
    2. Union members have to opt in to have a vote: for example, my union gives me a choice of two different political funds, one of which is Labour affiliated and the other is for general campaigning.
    3. Union members don’t all vote the way their leaders tell them to.
    4. At the 2016 election, less than 20% of votes cast were by affiliated union supporters, and of those, around 60% voted for Corbyn. Full members are by far the largest bloc.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Magic Grandad has his finger on the pulse? Yeah, right. Here’s a pretty accurate description of his performance today by the political sketch writer of that famously right-wing mouthpiece The Independent. The title itself sums him up…

    Jeremy Corbyn just delivered a masterclass in being the worst party leader in political history

    He seems to be having some kind of bet with himself to see just how much damage he can do to the Labour Party before his fingers are prized away from the leadership

    Interesting, do you actually have your own thoughts or just what you read? If you do could you answer my question rather than avoiding it with vapid ranting? In case you missed it I asked:

    Or have you missed the amount of folk not wanting to get involved in another US led middle eastern adventure?

    That aside, would you be supportive if he just didn’t turn up at all or would that just be a different stick to beat him with? I’m willing to bet the latter as opposed to the former in this case.

    Union members have to opt in to have a vote: for example, my union gives me a choice of two different political funds, one of which is Labour affiliated and the other is for general campaigning.

    Really? Wish we had that in GMB.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    Barry Gardiner is a very interesting character. Voted for the the Iraq war, nominated David Miliband for the leadership, once told Gordon Brown to resign because he wasn’t enough of a blairite, and has close ties to the Modi regime. He should stick to being the shadow minister for going on question time.

    I assumed it was just the Chinese having a tilt at the leadership.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/china-cash-link-to-top-labour-mp-65d3c92j8

    ctk
    Free Member

    They backed the wrong horse if so!

    ransos
    Free Member

    Really? Wish we had that in GMB.

    You do. See page 66 of your rulebook.

    https://www.gmb.org.uk/sites/default/files/GMB-RULEBOOK-2019.pdf

    binners
    Full Member

    Do I have my own thoughts? You know the answer to that, surely?

    Everyone who doesn’t think Jeremy is wonderful and his socialist vision is the only future, is obviously an unthinking drone, a gullible slave to the neoliberal military-industrial complex, totally incapable of independent thought, who eagerly awaits Rupert Murdoch spoon-feeding them their opinions every day.

    That’s the narrative, isn’t it?

    binners
    Full Member

    Oh…and SK I’m not answering your question or engaging with you in any way as you’re not even aware of what’s clearly stated on page 66 of your union rule book

    Come on… this is schoolboy stuff…

    ransos
    Free Member

    Oh…and SK I’m not answering your question or engaging with you in any way as you’re not even aware of what’s clearly stated on page 66 of your union rule book

    Come on… this is schoolboy stuff…

    Interesting how a post advising a member on how to use his union subscription is hijacked by you and your petty animosities. When I say interesting, I mean entirely predictable.

    binners
    Full Member

    Then, comrade, I suggest that you take a look at page 73, subsection 2, paragraph 3, appendage 7, which clearly proves you wrong

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Binners, going back to comrade len…as you stated turnover in last Unite election was 12.2%.
    His 45.5% share means that 5.6% of the union membership voted for him.
    I wouldn’t call that a democratic result.
    It’s even worse than the farce which masquerades as PCC elections.
    Unfortunately, McCluskey and his mates control the rule book.
    How will he connive at the next union election?

    binners
    Full Member

    The whole way Unite functions under McClusky is completely dysfunctional and corrupt.

    Unfortunately his entryist agenda, initially trialled by Militant in the 80’s was used as a template to deliver Corbynism, where he revelled in the totally out of kilter amount of power he wielded

    The man is a real piece of work. A narcissistic, power-crazed bully of the worst sort. A supposed Marxist conducting ‘socialist’ operations from his table in The Ivy (all on expenses, paid for by subs from union members, obviously)

    This sums up Len McClusky..

    Ex-labour MP awarded £75,000 in Libel damages after Union story

    Anna Turkey was bang on with her description of McClusky. He’s a vile human being

    ransos
    Free Member

    Then, comrade, I suggest that you take a look at page 73, subsection 2, paragraph 3, appendage 7, which clearly proves you wrong

    That almost passes for originality in your world.

    binners
    Full Member

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Binners – you’re getting over-excited in your trying; it’s Anna Turley, not Turkey.
    The damages award is being appealed by Unite and the costs award, if the appeal is unsuccessful, is closer to £2million than £1mill.
    There are 4 other cases against Labour and/or Corbynistas which are in the public domain and, in each, the solicitor’s are Lab’s favourites Howe & Co (who acted against Turley) with barrister Anthony Hudson expected to make an appearance – as he did against Turley.
    The judge in Turley’s case, after Hudson stated she ‘…was not fit to be an MP’, increased the damages award and said ‘…the defendants’ conduct during the trial has seriously aggravated the harm to (Turley’s) reputation and her distress’.
    Details courtesy of Private Eye.
    McCluskey – unaffected.
    Members subs – being wasted big style.
    My learned friends – laughing all the way.
    Sickening really.

    binners
    Full Member

    I left school at 16 and worked on the heavily unionised chemical plants on Merseyside in the 1980’s.

    I’ve had plenty of first hand experience of the Len McCluskey’s and Derek Hatton of this world*. Utter ****’s, the lot of them

    They were pathetic, Marxist dinosaurs in 1986 – totally self-serving- I’m gobsmacked that anyone is naive enough to buy their bullshit in the 21st century. That takes a special kind of stupid

    The likes of McClusky are about as concerned for the rights of workers as Jacob Rees Mogg. They’re entirely in it for themselves, which in my eyes makes them even worse than the Tory’s

    At least they make no pretence to not being utter ****s

    * not the Jeremy Corbyns, obviously, as there’s no chance on earth they’d be anywhere near an actual workplace like a chemical plant, particularly in the north

    ransos
    Free Member

    That takes a special kind of stupid

    Always the best way of convincing people of your point of view.

    binners
    Full Member

    There’s little point in trying to convince cult members that they’re wrong

    This is just me howling through a load-hailer into a shipping container as I watch the Corbynite lefty morons deliver us 20+ years of Tory rule

    Maybe if you lot had learnt anything at all in the last 4 years I might make some effort to mask my total and utter contempt…

    ****ing clowns

Viewing 40 posts - 921 through 960 (of 1,579 total)

The topic ‘New Labour leader/ direction’ is closed to new replies.