Having fun with words… ultimately… he was always going to have problems with “loyalty” with his MPs, when…
– Most didn’t think he was up to the job, and voted accordingly in a vote of no confidence… but were told to suck it up by the wider Labour movement.
– He listened to his advisors, including one with no history of supporting the Labour Party, instead of his elected MPs.
– He has a history of voting against and talking out against previous party leaders (good on him for that, but it was always likely to result in a rebellious parliamentary party when he took on a role at the top).
The new leader needs to sack the current advisors, and needs the support of a large swath of MPs from the outset. Giving a life long Communist the ear of the leader will not result in an electable party. Forcing a leader on the MPs that they can’t work with isn’t going to lead to electoral success. Having a leader who has rebelled against former leaders is no big deal really, compared to the other points… it’s a bit of a red herring… indeed, a history showing an “independent spirit” worked well for a Corbyn for a while, until he’d been leader long enough for the focus to shift to his performance as leader.