• This topic has 917 replies, 155 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by kelvin.
Viewing 40 posts - 721 through 760 (of 918 total)
  • mini budget thread
  • Klunk
    Free Member

    some think tank modelling in….

    While support for household and business energy bills makes a material difference to economic growth in the short term, we find that the growth plan tax cuts have an almost negligible impact on the size of the economy by the end of the forecast period, with output only around 0.4 per cent higher by 2027–28 than it would have been without the tax cuts. The growth plan’s tax measures therefore look set to fall well short of the chancellor’s stated aim of boosting GDP growth back to 2.5 per cent from the OBR’s previous assessment of trend growth settling at around 1.7 per cent per year.

    With the economy ending the forecast period 0.4 per cent bigger than it would be without the growth plan, additional tax revenue from this higher economic output pushes in the other direction. However, we estimate that this revenue boost is likely to be only around £6 billion by 2027–28 – a small fraction of the fiscal cost of the measures themselves.

    Klunk
    Free Member

    another predicts…

    +0.1% per year gdp for 82 billion in debt interest over 5 years

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    So they are going to sit on the OBR forecast for over 6 weeks.

    Surely this gives the opposition another stick to beat them with – can they really justify a lack of urgency?

    The Guardian: Treasury will delay publishing OBR forecast by six weeks after it is delivered on 7 October – UK politics live.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2022/sep/30/liz-truss-kwasi-kwarteng-obr-mini-budget-uk-politics-live

    Klunk
    Free Member

    So they are going to sit on the OBR forecast for over 6 weeks.

    gives the Spivs in selected firms a chance to peruse it and formulate the asset grab.

    andy5390
    Full Member

    A handy little website created to give some scale of the cost of this budget. (be prepared for a lot of scrolling)

    https://kamikwasi.tax/

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Delaying release if the OBR forecast shows utter contempt for the public, parliament and the OBR.
    In that 6 week window truss and kwarteng will be hoping the markets find something positive in their plans, that BoE will provide unlimited support, that $ and € will weaken, that public anger will fade, that *something* will happen to distract.
    Complete fantasy.
    How long before the OBR forecast, or parts of it, leak?

    cheese@4p
    Full Member

    andy – that’s gobsmacking (in a very bad way). I’d love to see it laid out flat in a single view. How long would it be?

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    They are delaying it so they can can edit the next mini budget to suit / counter any negatives that come from it with minimal negative press. It’s pretty obvious.

    But, it’ll leak anyway.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    I think they are just hoping for a miracle to distract from their ineptitude

    I don’t think they have the first clue about how they’ll produce a balanced budget

    doncorleoni
    Free Member

    This might sound like a stupid question on the subject of interest rates… I get putting rates up makes cost of borrowing more expensive so people spend less. But for people with existing mortgages, putting rates up (on money they have already borrowed) does sweet FA and only benefits the bank as they earn more money from the extra interest. I guess that also leave you with less money to spend which is the goal but basically free money for the bank to get richer..

    What am I missing here?

    thegeneralist
    Free Member

    Delaying release of the OBR forecast shows utter contempt for the public, .

    Ah well, looks like I agree with the tories on one thing at least 🙂
    They did after all vote the tories into government.

    mefty
    Free Member

    What am I missing here?

    The fact that the bank has borrowed the money it lent you and its interest cost has gone up.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    And that by putting interest rates up itnmakes it more attractive to folk to lend to uk government this improving the exchange rate

    finephilly
    Free Member

    I did a ‘fag-packet’ calculation on the 2.5% growth target versus £45bn in reduced tax revenue.
    UK GDP is around £2.2tn (2021)
    2.5% of that is £55bn.
    I will assume that figure is taxed at a flat rate of 20%, which is probably not far off reality.
    That’s $11bn per year.
    So, you may have another £50 in your back pocket but remember public services will be $34bn in the hole. Every year.
    Feel free to contradict me.

    5lab
    Full Member

    The growth should compound over time, so 2.5 then 5.1, 7.7, 10.5 etc. After 5 years I could see how it could add up

    kelvin
    Full Member

    What good is “growth” if 99% of people end up with lower real incomes, less access to essential services, worse quality of life… all while we deepen our dependence on climate change causing fossil fuels and leave the NHS stretched to breaking point?

    ernielynch
    Full Member

    What good is “growth” if 99% of people end up with lower real incomes, less access to essential services, worse quality of life…

    I think you have answered your own question there……. it’s great news for the 1%

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Agreed.

    BillMC
    Full Member

    ‘Growth’ is Labour’s re-wording of trickle down. Produce a lot more your bosses and you might get a few extra crumbs. There’s no suggestion of anything redistributive or compensating for inflation, inequality is preserved. The message is, ‘ don’t strike but work harder’.

    rone
    Full Member

    You know the financial sector’s response to this budget was hugely disproportionate to what was *going* to happen – I mean some of these tax cuts aren’t going to happen for a long while.

    Doesn’t add up to me. Tory comes in and offers Tory type *benefits* to society – sterling does a backflip – people do very well out of shorting and pumping.

    BoE does its thing and reminds us that everything is ultimately back-stopped by government money.

    It doesn’t make sense – you can whittle on all you want about the OBR but these tax cuts are nowhere near being rolled out, and well within Tory values.

    In fact the bond market is effectively controlled by the government – they set the rates etc.

    Why did it take a pound drop (which has been dropping for years) for everyone to shit the bed with the Tories? They’ve done far worse things and spent far bigger amounts of money.

    I’ve done all the analysis I could this week being busy myself but I can’t figure it out.

    Anyway my next guess for what could happen is for DXY (dollar dominance) to lose some of its strength – house prices to perhaps start to take a hit and that in and out of recession number to start to have a direction.

    It’s all really odd.

    I’m still not sold on this massive Labour lead either – all the shit that has happened and this week a massive jump in polling.

    Also – proof that chucking pensions to the financial sector is just a lottery.

    Like everything else.

    This oldish Tweet from Kelton really hits the spot.

    thecaptain
    Free Member

    Keep it up rone, you’ll get to a fully-fledged conspiracy theory eventually.

    rone
    Full Member

    Keep it up rone, you’ll get to a fully-fledged conspiracy theory eventually

    Cheers for that – there is a danger of that but if you can piece it together you’re a better person than me.

    That wasn’t really where I was going though was it?

    binners
    Full Member

    It doesn’t make sense

    There’s you’re problem, right their.

    You’re looking for rationality and logic where none exists. It never has.

    That way lies madness

    rone
    Full Member

    There’s you’re problem, right their.

    You’re looking for rationality and logic where none exists. It never has.

    That way lies madness

    Where people need to make money in markets there is definitely a logic, otherwise reconcile me a direction?

    Your favourite topic -Brexitism for instance, you need to come down on a side – was it done because people were crazy or did some know they were going to make a boat load?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    ‘Growth’ is Labour’s re-wording of trickle down.

    I think Labour laid out very clearly what their intentions were growth wise at conference, and it had nothing to do with trickle down. Their condemnation of trickle down nonsense has been robust. You couldn’t have missed it.

    As for Rone’s posts… surely it can be both… some people connected to the decision makers making big money out of shorting where the decisions made create big opportunities there, and also people (sometimes the same people) wanting to redistribute money upwards from all of us and from our state to the rich and often out of the country.

    binners
    Full Member

    Your favourite topic -Brexitism for instance, you need to come down on a side – was it done because people were crazy or did some know they were going to make a boat load?

    Brexit happened predominantly because so many people thought David Cameron was a **** and thought that registering that fact with a vote would be a bit of a laugh

    Sad but true

    rone
    Full Member

    The only thing I can see is things are so much in tatters every free-loading millionaire is looking to milk the economic descent as much as possible.

    I never thought Naomi Klein meant particularly this with the Shock Doctrine but clearly it is so.

    rone
    Full Member

    Brexit happened predominantly because so many people thought David Cameron was a **** and thought that registering that fact with a vote would be a bit of a laugh

    Sad but true

    But equally do you believe as you’ve said many times a lot of people were going to make a lot of money out of it?

    I mean you can see some sort of evidence for that this week.

    But on the flip side eurozone has massive inflation and weak to the dollar too.

    Things perhaps simple culminate in all sorts of awkward ways.

    I mean we were all talking recession (including the BoE) and yet the revised growth figures are not quite showing it.

    I do wish these stupid central banks would realise they aren’t fixing inflation though.

    rone
    Full Member

    As for Rone’s posts… surely it can be both… some people connected to the decision makers making big money out of shorting where the decisions made create big opportunities there, and also people (sometimes the same people) wanting to redistribute money upwards from all of us and from our state to the rich and often out of the country

    Yeah I agree.

    But my point from the outset is Truss offered a very Tory vision and the market shot off in the other direction.

    After government money to prop it up?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    The only thing I can see is things are so much in tatters every free-loading millionaire is looking to milk the economic descent as much as possible.

    Agreed… we’ve been saying this since 2016… lots of money to be made out of instability. They would describe that as making the UK economy leaner and more responsive rather than a “descent”… but the deregulation, extraction of money from normal people and our country, and increasing job and financial insecurity for UK workers will look much the same to most of us in the 99%.

    binners
    Full Member

    But equally do you believe as you’ve said many times a lot of people were going to make a lot of money out of it?

    Abso-****ing-lutely I do!

    The Shock Doctrine was prophecy! We are now Pinochets Chile, economically. A free market experiment

    Kwatangs budget on Friday was a logical post-Brexit staging post. As will be the huge cuts to public services, further tax giveaways to the rich and corporations and massive deregulation

    It’s all part of ‘the project’ and they’re only just getting started

    rone
    Full Member

    Agreed… we’ve been telling you this since 2016… lots of money to be made out of instability. They would describe that as making the UK economy leaner and more responsive rather than a “descent”… but the deregulation, extraction of money from normal people and our country, and increasing job and financial insecurity for UK workers will look much the same to most of us in the 99%.

    Then you would be simply ignoring what went before – in 2008 for instance.

    (I can tell you now though the asset class prefer bull markets to make cash in.)

    Economic collapse is not simply a Brexit watershed.

    rone
    Full Member

    Abso-****ing-lutely I do!

    The Shock Doctrine was prophecy! We are now Pinochets Chile, economically. A free market experiment

    But Klein was not particularly an EU advocate if I remember correctly. She just writes about the economic aftermath of catastrophic events. I get the connection though.

    As I’ve just pointed out to Kelvin – free-market self destruction did not start with Brexit.

    In fact there is way way too much emphasis put on that.

    rone
    Full Member

    Kwatangs budget on Friday was a logical post-Brexit staging post.

    In no way shape or form.

    It was simple traditional Tory misunderstanding of growth by tax cuts, because that’s what they believe.

    I keep pointing out to you Ireland has a very low corporation tax rate in the EU. (12.5%)

    TiRed
    Full Member

    It’s all really odd.

    When the herd turns…

    It’s just this is not the political herd. I think there was a relatively widespread view that interest rates needed to rise and the BoE were dragging their feet. That the fundamentals of the economy weren’t great. The announcement of an unfounded cut in taxes (quantitative easing) without any evidence of forethought was enough to push the market. Whether a costed projection would have helped, who knows?

    Interestingly, people mocked epidemic projections that are subject to exponential error rates, but they swallow economic forecasts. Economics ought to be relatively linear over the short term, but now I’m not so sure!

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Then you would be simply ignoring what went before

    Not all. Perhaps rewind and play the BBC’s far too late Radio4 piece on the IEA etc, and their role in earlier stages in this process, especially in wake of 2008. Same people, same combination of ends. The pressure to reshape UK politically and economically is ongoing. It didn’t start or end with Brexit. To paraphrase another forum member (Bruce), Brexit is not the destination, it’s just part of the journey. The acceleration of the redistribution of wealth upwards, the defunding of public services, deregulation in terms of financial services, employment, the environment and public health… it’s all an ongoing project.

    binners
    Full Member

    In no way shape or form.

    It was simple traditional Tory misunderstanding of growth by tax cuts, because that’s what they believe.

    I keep pointing out to you Ireland has a very low corporation tax rate in the EU. (12.5%)

    Corporation tax is a red herring. A distraction. Of little or no consequence as it’s generally avoided anyway

    It’s all the other stuff that’s the issue.

    Shrinking the state. Ultimately these lot see the UK government being a central office in London, where they dish out contracts to private companies to provide the lowest possible base level of ‘services’

    Meanwhile a deregulated financial sector acts as money launderers for dodgy international capital and a sweatshop economy, stripped of workers rights, undercuts our neighbours

    Once you accept that this was (and is) very much the plan, and the whole point of Brexit, it all makes a lot more sense

    Brexit was just the necessary beginning as they needed to be ‘free’ of the EU to make their dream a reality, which Truss and Kwatang just demonstrated; it now is

    rone
    Full Member

    The announcement of an unfounded cut in taxes (quantitative easing) without any evidence of forethought was enough to push the market. Whether a costed projection would have helped, who knows

    That’s what I’m hearing.

    The trouble is for them is the were going to unwind Q/E very shortly and couldn’t say they were doing more. But it was on the cards they absolutely had to. That was the main error.

    I guess it’s just the contradictions involved to pretend the government doesn’t have money of its own.

    Best just to sit back and realise tuff doesn’t go positive forever. I mean how long ago the last proper house price crash?

    tjagain
    Full Member

    What gets me is Germany has a high tax highly regulated economy and has been stable and prosperous. Can they simply not see that.

    As for first world economies that are similar to what truss wants look to the us. Yes its happened slowly there but look what a low tax low regulations economy brings. People without effective healthcare and eff all public services with massive poverty and a huge drug problem

    rone
    Full Member

    Meanwhile a deregulated financial sector acts as money launderers for dodgy international capital and a sweatshop economy, stripped of workers rights, undercuts our neighbours

    Once you accept that this was (and is) very much the plan, it all makes a lot more sense

    Thought you said there was not really a plan and it’s all just crazy?

    Corporation tax is not a red herring otherwise we wouldn’t have spent ages discussing it in previous posts. Most companies don’t avoid it. Some do. And it’s as easy to avoid income tax as corporation tax if you’re loaded. Trusst me – my mate’s wife was a top avoidance specialist to the rich and famous.

    We have operated on sweatshop economies for years as we import nearly everything.

    This is not news.

Viewing 40 posts - 721 through 760 (of 918 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.