What Graham said. Non-article and her argument has more logical fallacies than the “Your Logical Fallacy Is…” website.
I’m no fan of football and I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve been cornered in the kitchen at work say, someone’s asked me about the game last night (what game?), I’ve explained that I don’t follow football and they’ve gone “oh, right” and then proceeded to talk at me about it for the next 20 minutes.
But banning people talking about it is an utterly ludicrous notion. If nothing else, I think like in the example I just gave, some people simply have nothing else to talk about. Papping on about football might be excluding “women” (the 1970s are on the phone) or indeed people like me, but not being allowed to do so is potentially completely isolating those who have no other social interests.
The beatings will continue until morale improves?