“questionable background”……mmmm
I raced as a schoolboy and junior in the late 70s and right through the 80’s. I grew up with the fact that cycling was known to have a drugs culture, even at an amateur level in those days I know people who doped (I rode at a national level).
For me, even having read all the stories of the main guys who’ve written books in the past few years (Yates, Millar, Hamilton, Armstrong, Maertens, Voet, etc, etc), I am left with the feeling that they were as much victimes of the structure and culture of the sport rather than being cheats (yes, controversial I know).
The exception to that rule is Armstrong – it’s not the fact that he cheated, it’s the way he positioned himself, lied and screwed peoples lives that hits me.
As for the sport today, I believe it is much cleaner but the people involved who have links to the past will have the drug culture running through their veins, literally, and I think it’s almost inevitable that they will offer “help and advice” to people in their charge……these days, anyone found guilty must be punished harshly if this is going to change….I like both Rogers and JTL but I’m afraid that today we should have zero tolerance if found guilty…..
Team Sky’s policies are to be applauded in my view, and it’s only be breaking the ties I mention above that they can/will maintain the progress they appear to be making in the sport…..