Just checking my understanding of something here:
The American he met by the Thames left the boiled sweet with something inside it that I guess looks like a ‘suppository’. If it’s an oral pill it’s a pretty big one.
His flat mate finds the pill and is shocked and upset for him, asking why he didn’t say anything but about what is not really explained. Is that particular pill so synonymous with anti-retroviral drugs (because I’m assuming finding it is the reason she now thinks he’s HIV+)?
It cuts from there to him getting an HIV test, and it’s not really explained why he suddenly felt the need to do that unless he then clicked that the ‘pill’ he was given is indeed synonymous with HIV drugs and therefore left as a warning.
All of which is fine but the narrative is asking a lot of the audience to pieces together. Have I pieced more together than is there or is this how other people read it?