Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 88 total)
  • Legal eagles and Good Police of STW assemble; What should happen next?
  • crankboy
    Free Member

    I am a criminal lawyer this is my day to day world . I cannot see this ending in a caution . Assaults on medics doing their jobs are viewed seriously , this is a bad ABH drink is an aggravating factor as is the unprovoked attack . I would say chummy is going to the magistrates but only briefly as he is likely to sent to the big boys court (crown ) then my best bet is a custodial sentence with the true argument being whether good character remorse and impact to future career allows that sentence to be suspended on condition no further offending and complete a community order.
    The assault sentence guidelines are easily googleable.

    crankboy
    Free Member

    On whether prison works this is the sort of case where it is easy to argue that the deterent effect of sloting first time offenders justifies custody to send a message to the wider comunity, to an extent that out weighs the detrimental impact of custody on the individual.

    qwerty
    Free Member

    Is the Paramedics union representative hounding ambulance service legal services for full implementation of the zero tolerance policy on verbal and physical assaults against NHS staff?

    qwerty
    Free Member

    Oh, and if we’re talking legalities, it’s essential service, not emergency service.

    duckman
    Full Member

    Well I hope we find out if prison works in this instance.

    zanelad
    Free Member

    I hope that the scrote is charged and has his day in court. If not, he’ll just assume that he’s got away with it and won’t change his behaviour.

    I’m sure of I punched Mrs Z in the face while pissed I’d be up before the beak in double quick time. Mind you, the legal side of things would be the least of my worries. She is one to bear a grudge……..

    This is no different in my view.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    On whether prison works this is the sort of case where it is easy to argue that the deterent effect of sloting first time offenders justifies custody to send a message to the wider comunity, to an extent that out weighs the detrimental impact of custody on the individual.

    This +1

    If he gets away with it then that’s a green light to every other drunk person, among who’m there will always be one idiot, who will throw a punch.

    I suppose it depends how mentally prepared for it you are and I’m no psychiatrist but I’d imagine an unprovoked punch to the face whilst doing your job is going to sit in the back of your mind for quite a long time and affect you.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    And there was me thinking that the STW hive disliked prison as a punishment, and thought it should be for rehabilitation only.
    How wrong was I?!?

    fin25
    Free Member

    If you punch a paramedic in the face without provocation, are you not in need of rehabilitation?

    Sui
    Free Member

    fin25 – Member

    If you punch a paramedic in the face without provocation, are you not in need of rehabilitation?

    rehab comes in many forms, a kicking Is one such.

    crankboy
    Free Member

    The guideline suggests a starting point of 26 weeks in custody and range of community order to 51 weeks the aggravating features night, drink , medic etc would push up the range the mitigation good character remorse down the range then > 1/3 of for a guilty plea . I assume a broken/ displaced nose requiring surgery is greater harm and there are no factors indicating high culpability as defined in the guidelines.

    leegee
    Full Member

    IANAL but the fact he squared up to the female medic and the victim before assaulting him is to me premeditated or intent. And assault with intent is considered far more serious?.

    Is busting someones nose really ABH? I would have guessed that was GBH?

    qwerty
    Free Member

    There is a time and place for financial compensation, and this it it. The victims closure of this should be sealed with money.

    saxabar
    Free Member

    On whether prison works this is the sort of case where it is easy to argue that the deterent effect of sloting first time offenders justifies custody to send a message to the wider comunity, to an extent that out weighs the detrimental impact of custody on the individual.

    Agreed, easy to argue, but not sure it is correct. Is a coked and boozed-up angry 21 year old, who is prone to violence, really going to recollect at 2am what, at best, they may have glanced in a newspaper days before?

    Anyhow, a bit off-thread. Apologies OP.

    midlifecrashes
    Full Member

    Prison does work.

    It may not always or often rehabilitate, it might not even punish in some circumstances where life inside turns out to be better than outside for some, but it 100% protects the general public and ambulance crews from this **** for the 18 months or more that he’s locked up, and that’s good enough for me.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    Decent sentencing might not deter the exact same incident, but it also sends out the message to the paramedic crews and A&E teams that receiving violence should not be an expected part of the role.

    And it might have a slight deterrant effect on the people who spit, scratch and punch emergency workers even when they aren’t completely pissed up.

    franksinatra
    Full Member

    I’ve been drunk on many occasions and never felt the need to punch any of the emergency services in the face. I therefore conclude that alcohol is not sufficient excuse.

    fisha
    Free Member

    I totally agree that it was an incredibly scummy thing to do, but we don’t know his character.

    But that is exactly what you do know . . . his character is one that can become an unpredictable, abusive and violent person. There is no other way looking at it. In the circumstances described, that was his character and behaviour at that time. Whilst alcohol may be a causal factor, its certainly not an excuse.

    University degree or something else, doesn’t matter. In fact, its right that that sort of behaviour should receive and later be shown on a criminal record and available for disclosure on job applications. Quite rightly, who would want an employee that could behave in that manner ???

    I do hope that he gets some form of criminal justice result that is more that just a caution and that whilst being punitive does offer some restorative learning to the person so he doesn’t do it again

    Decent sentencing might not deter the exact same incident, but it also sends out the message to the paramedic crews and A&E teams that receiving violence should not be an expected part of the role.

    And it might have a slight deterrant effect on the people who spit, scratch and punch emergency workers even when they aren’t completely pissed up..

    +100 . . . but it won’t. people will still get pissed and punch emergency services.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    I’ve been drunk on many occasions and never felt the need to punch any of the emergency services in the face. I therefore conclude that alcohol is not sufficient excuse.

    Hear hear. I normally fall asleep with beatific smile playing across my lips.

    fin25
    Free Member

    There was a time in my life when my mental health was not what you would describe as stable. I was drunk all the time (not helped by working in a pub) and would regularly start fights, always with men bigger than me and I always got knocked out. Friends have described my behaviour at the time as a bit sad, and many pointed out that I wanted to get kicked in, rather than doing the kicking.
    I now work with vulnerable young people, many of whom have quite acute mental illness and emotional instability. Many of these young people get into fights, but I have never witnessed any of them attack someone in such a way without provocation.
    If this guy has started a fight with two paramedics, then broke one of their noses without provocation, he needs to be held accountable for his action and take some responsibility. Whatever his mental or emotional state was at the time bears little influence in my opinion, as his actions show a clear intent to hurt others and should be investigated and judged in court.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    And there was me thinking that the STW hive disliked prison as a punishment, and thought it should be for rehabilitation only.

    Now I do believe in needing much, much better rehabilitation and training rather than lock ’em up approach.

    However we have what we have, and this type of incident requires us to apply the law and punishment as it stands.

    irc
    Full Member

    Irc; who should grab it with both hands?

    I was suggesting that if the assailant got offered a caution he should take it as it would be a massive let off. Personally I’d say either a prison sentence or at best conviction and some other disposal would be appropriate.

    Prison does work. I was talking to a “client” at my work the other day. Done for murder as a teenager. Served 14 yrs. Was out for 3 years but now recalled to prison under the terms of his life licence after being charged with a serious assault. I’d guess a fair few members of the public have been saved from harm by him while he was inside. Expensive, but if 14 yrs jail doesn’t rehabilitate someone at least the public are protected while that person is inside.

    freeagent
    Free Member

    Should be getting the jail for that. I would seriously doubt it’s the first time he’s been a drunken, aggressive prick. Dressing it up as jolly student japes and previously of good character don’t mean a lot to me. A guy’s been badly injured doing his job.

    This +1

    yunki
    Free Member

    Hooray for tough guys! Beating mentally ill people up makes things better! You can always rely on police officers’ judgement on who deserves a kicking!

    To be honest, the young fella in question is a fine upstanding member of the community now, and would still maintain to this day that he was treated very fairly in all of his dealings with the police

    cbmotorsport
    Free Member

    It still amazes me that people do this sort of thing. I have a healthy respect and admiration for our Emergency/Essential Service personnel. I cannot fathom any scenario where I would say a cross word, let alone assault one of their members in the line of duty. We are very quick to rely on them when our luck runs out.

    Sorry, but this guy needs a wake up call, a short prison sentence would probably be a good way of administering that.

    irc
    Full Member

    Oh, and if we’re talking legalities, it’s essential service, not emergency service.

    I stand corrected. Though in Scotland it is emergency services. See Emergency Workers (Scotland) Act 2005 for assaults on police, fire, medical, ambulance etc staff.

    jekkyl
    Full Member

    What should happen next?

    a good kicking in the back of the police van? [/1970’spolicing]

    duckman
    Full Member

    jekkyl – Member

    What should happen next?

    a good kicking in the back of the police van? [/1970’spolicing]

    TBH,there is a pecking order in prison based on what you have done,so he may end up getting that.

    Coyote
    Free Member

    Agree a short prison sentence is required.

    scuttler
    Full Member

    Undoubtedly he deserves a massive scare

    Yeah – Send him down and call it a gap year.

    I’ve seen loads of these to-ing and fro-ing matey “I’m OK” tossers who’s moods flip just like that. They’re the worst – dangerous and unpredictable and I wouldn’t want them anywhere near me.

    yunki
    Free Member

    what about compulsory six months sentence for any university student committing a criminal offence?
    these establishments do seem to be breeding grounds for tossers

    Cougar
    Full Member

    But that is exactly what you do know . . . his character is one that can become an unpredictable, abusive and violent person. There is no other way looking at it.

    Absolutely what I was about to say.

    A fine upstanding member of society does not have a couple of sherberts and then square up to a female paramedic who’s trying to help his mate before launching a violent unprovoked attack on her colleague.

    Alcohol lowers inhibitions; if he’s the sort of person who does this sort of thing when drunk, he’s the sort of person who really wants to do this but retains the composure not to when sober. To wit, he’s a nasty, aggressive piece of work. And even if hypothetically that’s not the case and it’s a total reversal of character when drunk, a fine upstanding member of society would give up drinking.

    cbmotorsport
    Free Member

    ^This.

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    Thanks for all the comments. All really appreciated, but actually some really useful stuff been said here, with special mentions to IRC, Siwhite and Crankboy for their useful links and knowledgable input. All will be used to push the ambo service ‘Zero Tolerance’ policy with a surprisingly reluctant Detective Sergeant, who was definitely minded to go with a conditional caution, with the condition being that the offender attend a ‘victim impact’ course. Personally I didn’t feel that that fitted the crime, although I appreciate that views will differ.

    (Hypothetically speaking, of course)

    STW, pat yourselves on the back. You’ve been really helpful, yet again. 8) 8)

    Edit;

    Oh, and if we’re talking legalities, it’s essential service, not emergency service.

    Now, this is an oft repeated ‘fact’ within ambulance services, and I dare say it was true once upon a time (it must have come from somewhere), but I’m not really sure it’s true any more. Certainly Ambulance Service workers are referred to as ’emergency workers’ in recent legislation, and in major incident planning they are category 1 responders. I’d be interested to know the origins of this ‘essential service vs emergency service’ thing, and whether it is a) still the case, and b) actually means anything at all.

    Anyone?

    tthew
    Full Member

    I hope this doesn’t affect Mr Hypotheical too much in the long term. There’s zero excuse for punching anyone when pissed, paramedic or not.

    I know it’s not sentencing guidelines, but can I suggest a lifetime ban from the use of NHS services should also be an appropriate answer. Medical insurance for private care should be the order of the day now, (assuming anyone would take him on).

    scandal42
    Free Member

    Quite like that idea, difficult to administer though.

    Punch someone in the face in the pub without provocation and you are banned from that pub, the same should apply here.

    Richie_B
    Full Member

    I’d be interested to know the origins of this ‘essential service vs emergency service’ thing

    IIRC it was a jolly wease thought up during the last period the Tories were in power to de-couple ambulance pay from the formulas which were used to calculate pay rises used for the emergency services

    project
    Free Member

    ZERO TOLERANCE OF ATTACKS ON EMERGENCY SERVICES, Theres a clue in their name theyre there in an emergency,and sadly that thug put one of them out of action while getting treated also required ambulance and medical staff to treat the paramedic, all which could be helping people in real distress.

    12 months in prison as a gap year, compo payment via small claims to paramedic.

    qwerty
    Free Member

    . I’d be interested to know the origins of this ‘essential service vs emergency service’ thing, and whether it is a) still the case, and b) actually means anything at all.

    Take a look at your retirement age and pension compared to the other services.

    I_did_dab
    Free Member

    sounds like “actual bodily harm”, Magistrates court, fine/suspended sentence, criminal record, bound over to keep the peace..hopefully

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 88 total)

The topic ‘Legal eagles and Good Police of STW assemble; What should happen next?’ is closed to new replies.