I initially thought this was hilarious.
On reflection it’s being just as nasty as Hopkins, so now I feel bad about its funniness. Surely she has a mental problem.
Hmmm, She can dish it out and notes that “it’s normally incoming fire balls” so one assumes she can take it by now…
Yes it was seeking to make her look ridiculous, and succeeded (with her assistance).
But also made the point that freedom of speech is a double-edged sword, if you want it then Katie Hopkins has the right to peddle the notion that she is “oppressed” for her demography and outright bigotry, she has the basic freedom to be heard… Of course if someone wants to (rather elaborately) make the counter point, that she is actually just an unpleasant, hate fuelled, narcissist they have an equal right to do so…
Both sides of the debate have made their point, so who do you find more compelling?
As for her “mental health problems” she’s an ego-maniacal, narcissist.
She seems to crave attention for negative behaviour, in a world that rewards just such behaviour with attention, perhaps she has a problem, but maybe society has a wider issue, as we seem to be giving her just what she wants rather than what she needs…