We have a ‘cycle lane’ (pavement with a line down the middle) nearby, that runs along a busy single carriageway B road, though a highly populated area with shops and a school on it and side road junctions every 100m or so. With the number of pedestrians wandering across it combined with having to slow or stop at every side junction it is practically unusable. To be fair I can understand why pedestrians don’t want cyclists on the pavement when they are coming out the shops and walking their children to school, however if you ride on the road you just get angry drivers trying to squeeze by shouting out their side window “Use the Cycle Lane”.
Thank you Elmbridge Council for making cyclists 3rd class traffic.
Similar set up on Priory Lane running into Richmond Park. Footpath on one side is designated as a shared use foot/cycle path but it’s got pedestrians all over it, dogwalkers, leaves and it’s slow. Might be OK for a doddery old biddy on a folder but for the hundreds of roadies heading into RP, none of them would even consider it. And oh wow, does it wind up the gammons. Even though it’s a 20mph limit and the cyclists are usually doing 17-20 anyway.
In answer to the OP, I used to ride the A4 into London occasionally and there were sections of that whihc had a “cycle lane” to one side. It was so slow and so dangerous with cars turning across and going into/out of driveways that it was far quicker and safer to use the main road. And at the time I was riding it, traffic as usually bumper to bumper anyway, speeds not usually much more than I could do.