- IDS gets totally pwned
Guy embarrasses himself and flounces out.
And gets all the points he mentions published in a national paper.Posted 6 years ago
I must have missed the panda gag amid the incoherent ranting.
There are more pandas in Scotland than Tory MPs nicely sums up the rarity factor of Tories north of the border.
To be fair Tories ministers have a bit of a cheek making speeches in Scotland when they have been so comprehensively rejected there.Posted 6 years ago
Slow day at a Newspaper
You don’t think Guardian readers are really interested in a Tory minister getting heckled by anti-cuts protesters ?
The BBC also carried the story
as did several other newspapers.Posted 6 years ago
So minority groups attempting to make speeches is now a “bit of a cheek” ? An interesting new spin on freedom of expression? At the least the one “minority group” representative had the decency to listen to the other!
If it was a slow day, the Guardian should have got the reporter to proof read his colleague’s article on Cyprus to prevent the list of inaccuracies it contains. Quality journalism??????Posted 6 years agogrumMember
Oh dear did that blog post really compare work experience with workfare? There’s a crucial difference there isn’t there. 🙄
And oh look here’s THM definitely not showing his right-wing bias again, because he’s above all that pettiness.
I think ‘ratbag’ was a pretty polite way of putting it TBH.Posted 6 years ago
It may well have been more valid Ernie, but that has never been a criteria for restricting speech.
Grum, remember there is a ball out there if you choose to play it. And please refer to previous posts on freedom of speech for all kinds of people including suspected terrorists etc. But if you think freedom of speech and respect is petty then so be it. Says a lot.Posted 6 years ago
that has never been a criteria for restricting speech.
That’s one hell of a jump – from saying that Tory minsters have a cheek making speeches in Scotland when they and their policies have been so comprehensively rejected there, and “restricting speech”.
How did you manage to make it ?Posted 6 years agoklumpyMember
It’s possible to say that there was no pwnage on display without actually being on the side of IDS.
Nevertheless, this video invites the thread to descend into a combined argument on tories vs others and Scottish independence so should be closed immediately.
(29ers suck!)Posted 6 years ago
The topic ‘IDS gets totally pwned’ is closed to new replies.