Viewing 36 posts - 1 through 36 (of 36 total)
  • How accurate is Strava?
  • rocketman
    Free Member

    Was idly looking at some of the Strava routes on Cannock Chase the other day and noticed this one: A little leg tickle

    This is basically my local loop (I live just up the road from Milford) and while it takes me more like 4 hours at my mince-tastic pace (congrats Matt M. BTW) I was more than a little surprised that it’s 35 miles 😯

    Now I’ve never had a speedo or a cyclecomputer but a few mates have, and even allowing for calibration inaccuracies I’d got it down as about 25 miles.

    Of course if it really is 35 miles and 4400 ft of elevation I’m quite chuffed 🙂

    Is Strava absolutely accurate or is it all just relative?

    njee20
    Free Member

    It’s not hugely accurate in many respects, but distance generally seems about right, so I’d say that’s not far off.

    Elevation can be very wide of the mark, not entirely sure if Strava works it out based on their own algorithms and the route points, or takes the data from the device, in which case anything using GPS altitude is likely to be well off.

    VanHalen
    Full Member

    Accurate if you are kom. Not very accurate if you are 2nd

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Unless you measure it you wont know 🙂
    Distance wise it seems to stack up if it follows the route correctly. Over that distance I generally get a lot of match ups with other recordings etc. I think it plots the points then checks distance. As it’s measured by a Garmin 705 I would assume it’s reasonably close.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    I think over that distance even if it’s 5% inaccurate you’ll be nearer 35 than 25 miles 🙂

    It does tend to ‘snap to’ segments – so if you ride the fire road beside a segment it’ll move your track to the segment but generally for distance and elevation it’s as accurate as your gps receiver so ‘fairly’ good really.

    try uploading to Garmin connect for a comparison, maybe?

    M1llh0use
    Free Member

    depends on the device that you are tracking with. iphone/android not brilliant. garmins are a bit better.

    RickyRah
    Free Member

    not entirely sure if Strava works it out based on their own algorithms and the route points, or takes the data from the device

    I think it depends on whether your GPS has a barometric altimeter. If it does, then Strava will take the data directly from the device as it is deemed to be more accurate than elevation databases. If it doesn’t, Strava will calculate your elevation based on their elevation databases.

    If you get dodgy elevation data, there is an option to correct it by clicking on the question mark below the total elevation.

    Nobby
    Full Member

    I find the elevation data on Strava, Garmin Connect & Mapmyride to be very similar but it’s way out on Endomondo – that’s using a GPS with a barometric altimeter.

    Distance data always seems very close on all of ’em.

    jambalaya
    Free Member

    I think the distance works quite well with regard to the phone apps like Strava and Endomondo. We have seen some differences when doing the same loop with two phones both “recording” but they are quite small.

    What doesn’t work well is the cumulative climbing/descending stats. GPS location is calculation based upon satellite signals/locations and it has a little noise in it, this doesn’t make much difference to distance but it makes a bigger difference to altitude. If you sit with a GPS device with an altitude read out you’ll see it move around even if you stand still, the translates to exaggerated climbing/descending stats. Often this is visible as you ride a loop and the climbing/descending stats don’t match.

    More sophisticated GPS devices than phones have a signal strength / accuracy measure so that the user can estimate how accurate the position given is.

    tomlevell
    Full Member

    That person has done the lower loop twice though.
    Knock that out it goes down to about 22miles.

    rocketman
    Free Member

    That person has done the lower loop twice though.

    Ah yes I see it now I’ve zoomed in

    Oh well 🙁

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    He has?

    zoom in on the map and you can see two tracks where gps inaccuracy hasn’t followed same route. Looking at overall view it’s tricky to see, though.

    rocketman
    Free Member

    Just looked again and it looks as though he’s done Monkey twice as well!

    It get worse!

    rocketman
    Free Member

    zoom in on the map and you can see two tracks where gps inaccuracy hasn’t followed same route

    Please tell me he’s only done it there and back 🙂

    chrispo
    Free Member

    Blimey, that ride’s got more segments than a whole forest of satsuma trees!

    I guess creating endless segments is the only way to get KOMs in civilisation (other than pedalling really fast). Round my way, you pick a hill, any hill, and the chances are you get the KOM…

    fuzzhead
    Free Member

    IME, Strava is pretty inaccurate, but it’s all a laugh innit? As per Van Halen, sometimes the inaccuracy works in your favour, sometimes it doesn’t…

    STATO
    Free Member

    zoom in on the map and you can see two tracks where gps inaccuracy hasn’t followed same route. Looking at overall view it’s tricky to see, though.

    Or just drag your mouse along the profile map to watch the ‘rider’ move along the map track, easy to spot then.

    Superficial
    Free Member

    I think it depends on whether your GPS has a barometric altimeter. If it does, then Strava will take the data directly from the device as it is deemed to be more accurate than elevation databases. If it doesn’t, Strava will calculate your elevation based on their elevation databases.

    More or less, yes. Their algorithm is quite complicated.

    https://strava.zendesk.com/entries/20965883-elevation-for-your-activity

    I would think that for total distance, Strava is accurate within 1-2%. It sometimes has ‘jumps’ in timing which as stated can either improve or worsen your segment times significantly.

    cheese@4p
    Full Member

    Strava does seem to have a tendency to cut corners. 😉

    agentdagnamit
    Free Member

    Just used Strava for the first time, on a 2 mile run from my house. I know it’s 2 miles as I’ve measured it in Memory Map and with my bike computer and a garmin. Strava just told me I ran 3.6 miles in 15 minutes….

    A lot of the rotue is under trees around the edge of the park, which might throw out the gps tracking. Also, when I look at the route in Strava, it is really “zig-zaggy”, which is why the distance is nearly doubled. Strava doesnt seem to smooth this out, like Garmin Connect does.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    swinleys new trails always show up 20% shorter than they should be on my strava I think it’s the tree cover and lots of doubling back twisty turny trails

    thepurist
    Full Member

    Sure you’re not one if those corner cutters kimbers? 😉

    atlaz
    Free Member

    I’ve just lost several KOMs to some suspiciously good riders around here. I mean, sure, they’re pro riders on UCI world tour or continental tour teams but surely they can’t be THAT much faster 😯

    Perils of having local road rides on the same routes that a pro race happens on. Even the fairly handy local riders are looking a bit lack lustre.

    slowjo
    Free Member

    There do seem to be timing inaccuracies depending on the device used too. On more than one occasion (in fact….lots of occasions) we have noticed discrepancies – such as when one of us trounces the other on a segment yet still comes out significantly slower.

    The biggest errors seem to come with phones, they seem to be quite different to dedicated gps devices. I can only assume it is down to the sampling rate.

    Distances though seem within a few % whatever you use.

    fuzzhead seems to have got it right though.

    char34
    Free Member

    milage is usally about right but climbing is way off ( or garmin is way off)
    i ride with a chap whos got a garmin his climbing is allways a lot more on exactly the same route
    did lakes last week i had 4800 feet on strava
    mate had 5300 feet on garmin

    creamegg
    Free Member

    I wouldn’t say distance is accurate. A difference of 4km was recorded on a 30kmn ride between my mates Strava via I-phone and my Garmin device. Large difference on the total climb as well. Could be either or both out though.

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    not strava but iphone gps can be pretty accurate compared to a wheel speed sensor.


    Test by jambo-uk, on Flickr

    Lawmanmx
    Free Member

    I deleted off my phone it be because of its inaccuracies, useless app if its inaccurate IMO

    Rusty-Shackleford
    Free Member

    it be because of its inaccuracies

    Arrrrrrrrrrr!

    andypaul99
    Free Member

    my climb rate is always higher on strava than garmin, according to strava ive climbed 10,496m in the past 28 days but garmin shows 10,122m.
    im obviously going with strava 😀

    tomlevell
    Full Member

    I’ve just lost several KOMs to some suspiciously good riders around here. I mean, sure, they’re pro riders on UCI world tour or continental tour teams but surely they can’t be THAT much faster

    Perils of having local road rides on the same routes that a pro race happens on. Even the fairly handy local riders are looking a bit lack lustre.

    Without any data to look at you’ll find that they probably ARE that much faster. Plus could have been full TT training or even motor pacing on the road.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    swinleys new trails always show up 20% shorter than they should be on my strava I think it’s the tree cover and lots of doubling back twisty turny trails

    No, they are 1-2miles shorter than the signs say they are. I presumed it’s because there’s obvious scope to extend them in places like that random tabletop at the top of the first switchback climb on the blue (look left and it looks like they cleared a trail into it), W9Y, Red 4, etc, so the planned distance is longer than what was actualy built.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    As for inacuracies, at worst my garmin seems to be 5-10m out (and for soem reason, consistent, i.e. 2 traces will be shadows of each other, just a few meters appart). So that’s what, 1-2 seconds?

    If you’re bothered about <30second segments then that’s a problem, but I only really keep an eye on the longer 5 minute+ ones as they’re a more realistic guage of fitness/skill/balls anyway.

    bartimaeus
    Free Member

    If your GPS track is rubbish then your Strava data will be rubbish. Most phones seem to have fairly poor GPS in them.

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    If your GPS track is rubbish then your Strava data will be rubbish. Most phones seem to have fairly poor GPS in them.

    This. If I leave my phone in a pocket, shit GPS track.

    Rear Jersey pocket on road bike or top pocket of my bag on the mtb and its as good as a garmin.

Viewing 36 posts - 1 through 36 (of 36 total)

The topic ‘How accurate is Strava?’ is closed to new replies.