Hope or Mavic
821s look good, but they’re heavy when you take the specif nipples they se into account. Stan’s are ahead of the game, weight wise, and their tubeless setup is every bit as reliable as UST.
Newer Mavic hubs have none of the issues of the old ones, have foudn them very good – Hope are arguable less reliable, but much better customer service.
SLRs very light, more XC trail than an AM/Alps setup, and a bit narrow.
I’d lean towards Hope Hoops with a Flow EX/Arch EX rim. Very hard to beat for value.Posted 4 years agoNorthwindSubscriber
The 821’s had some varying reports on weight but it doesn’t seem as lardy as the other 8s- the weight’s still crooked but seemingly not by as much. If weight bothers you I’d spend a bit of time trying to find numbers you can trust. Or, just buy Stans. But I’m expecting the 821 to be a bit more dent resistant than a Flow, Mavic are usually that bit “harder” if not neccesarily tougher.
If you’re looking at 821s then stop looking at SLR IMO!Posted 4 years agorickmeisterSubscriber
In the spirit of recommending what you have, then Mavic. Running Crossmax St and other Crossmax UST on all our bikes and have been fuss free and a very tough rim for all our riding, same as your list.
If the S/H SLR’s are the older hub there is a simple, cost effective kit that removes the plastic bush that was the weak point, replacing with a quality bearing.
Never had any problem and cant understand the sealing point above, as they do have seals.
For UST, I would buy a UST rim.. I have not had good results with rim strips and all that, IMHO.Posted 4 years agoNorthwindSubscriber
Stans rims don’t use rim strips- I’ve used a few (and some copies) and once taped, the current ones are functionally identical to Mavic UST. (my older ones, maybe not quite so much)
I do like my Mavic hubs, it’s a good design but when I broke an axle it took a long time to get a replacement, and it was expensive. (out of warranty to be fair) Last time I broke a hope axle, I could have bought a new one for £20 but they sent me 2 in the post the next day for free. And changing axle specs etc on Mavic often isn’t easy when it’s possible at all which can be a big drawback.
I’m maybe overreacting to some bad experiences but I’m sick of “wheel systems” and proprietary spokes and stuff, just too much drawback for my taste, gradually replacing all mine and will be happy when they’re gone. I’m no Hope fan but some things they do very right, when DT aren’t affordable.Posted 4 years agofozzybearMember
Hope hoops with stans.
I’ve just swapped from Hope / Mavic combo.
The Mavic were harder to inflate tubeless(821’s) weighed more with the extra threaded nipple design and weren’t as wide as the Stans.
I can feel the weight/stiffness difference but I’m also putting that down what I think is a better wheel build (Sapim cx spokes now and had cheaper DT ones before).
Either way i’ll not be going back to Mavic rims again, while they were tough they were heavier.Posted 4 years agomaxtorqueMember
I run SLR’s on my XC bike, and ST’s on my Enduro(TM) bike. However, i’m fairly light (~70kg with all my kit) and tend to ride in a style that sees me unweight/loft/manual rather than batter through the Gnar. As such, i find the mavic wheels strong enough for any riding i’m going to do (including the Alps/UK DH etc.
I’d imagine, giving that they use proprietary spokes etc, getting replacement parts will be harder for the Mavics, but to date i’m never needed any. All i find is that just occasionally i need to tweak the bearing preload a bit(5sec job, without removing wheel from bike), more on the ST’s than the SLRs (as maybe they get used harder)Posted 4 years ago
The topic ‘Hope or Mavic’ is closed to new replies.