[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4oHTq3gjxU[/video]

My head hurts at him below

First time I’ve seen that.

Is it Groundhog Day?

Guess its been done eh……I Fail

yea been done blokes a tool.

is this “I’m a student of the law”

tosser – shudduv bundled him into a vayn and lost him somewhere

Jeez, The cop should have just asked for his name and address, if the traninee lawyer refused that he would have had every right to detain him and use reasoanble force to do so until someone that did know the law arrived. Police recruitment procedures would appear to be inadequate.

Done loads of times.

Criminals trying to get away with stuff happens all the time on “Police Camera Action” type programs (I just borrowed the car, I’ve only just insured it etc.), difference is the policeman usually know how to deal with it.

http://dannyshine.blogspot.com/2011/04/bike-incident.html

That clip really made my blood boil.
That policeman displayed far more patience than I had sitting in my lounge in front of my computer.
That cyclist was a complete moron.

Total nob.

Sadly he came against a police officer that wasn’t apparently very well trained.

He probably won’t post the next video when he comes up against a copper that does know the correct wording and arrests him.

Either the video is out of date or the officer is. The power of arrest is now in the serious crime and organised naughtyness act. And would justify lippys arrest.

Does always interest me that you rarely find out the end result from these videos.

My power of arrest is still s24 PACE.

video has been removed

The bloke is a tool. He’s trying to make RLJ into some sort of civil liberties issue. You did it, you got caught, take your own advice and put on the “big boy trousers” and take what’s coming.

Yes the policeman was ill trained and ill prepared but the cyclist is the sort of knob that anti-bike people love.

That guy(cyclist) was a tool, reading his blog above reinforces that.

Kato I bet your power of arrest is in fact sec 110 of the serious organised crime and police act 2005. Which did away with the concept of arrestable offences and made all offences arrestable subject to general conditions . It is a substitution for the original pace sec 24 not wrong to quote the power as. Sec 24 pace but the copper seemed not to realise he could arrest in these circumstances.

The cyclist is still a prat.

Nob cyclist versus Numpty Plod.

No one wins. 🙁

Hey, have you seen this crazy video?!

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2oymHHyV1M[/video]

WOW! A buck? Where was that????????????????

That Cop v Knob vid was even discussed on Radio2 according to mrsdezb. Must’ve been fascinating.

Anyone seen this one?

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgoHo9pLXI4[/video]

110 amended s24. It didn’t replace it