While I’m on my moaning horse:
That massive overhang!? If you are going to have a feature like that I think it should have a reason to exist. The reason seemed to be purely to have a massive overhang. It looked obnoxious, it wasn’t sustainable in that it presumably needed a lot of extra material to support it, and it wasn’t cleverly balanced but needed an engineer to look at the drawings and sort out a way of keeping it up.
All the architect did was draw an overhanging line and say “I want an overhang that long woooo” and leave the engineer and the builder to sort it out.
I don’t get how that makes a building architecturally significant. I think if a building looks like one thing but has got loads of hidden engineering to make it look that way, rather than being designed in a cohesive way then it’s a bit of fail.