Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
  • This topic has 11 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by IHN.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Gopping or Art? (caution! clash of wheel diameters inside)
  • rOcKeTdOg
    Full Member

    Posted 11 years ago
    jivehoneyjive
    Free Member

    I like it, but it is but a reprint of a past master:

    http://ewrbikes.com/owb_specs

    Posted 11 years ago
    lucien
    Full Member

    Gopping indeed

    Posted 11 years ago
    lucien
    Full Member

    And they have missed a shock off the back as well

    Posted 11 years ago
    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    The bastard son of a clothes horse and a penny-farthing.

    Those extra frame tubes are pointless, and not in a good GT, Jones or cruiser/towel rail way either.

    Uglier than a hatful of monkey’s arseholes.

    Posted 11 years ago
    nigelb001
    Free Member

    The first one is an utterly gopping mish-mash of random angles. The second pic is better because of the straight line of the toptube/seatstay. I don’t really like either though. Not Art!!

    Posted 11 years ago
    Northwind
    Full Member

    I have a history of ugly bikes. I still wouldn’t let that in the garage.

    Posted 11 years ago
    Candodavid
    Free Member

    I think my eyes are bleeding

    Posted 11 years ago
    charliedontsurf
    Full Member

    I would consider it if it was a 29er rear 36er front.

    Posted 11 years ago
    aracer
    Free Member

    I’ll say one thing for it, the different wheel sizes are far less offensive than on a less ugly bike.

    Posted 11 years ago
    watsontony
    Free Member

    for some reason they remind me of them poxy folding bikes. more so for the white one.

    Posted 11 years ago
    IHN
    Full Member

    I like it.

    Posted 11 years ago
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘Gopping or Art? (caution! clash of wheel diameters inside)’ is closed to new replies.

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women