Viewing 38 posts - 41 through 78 (of 78 total)
  • FBU win legal challenge for pensions.
  • chestrockwell
    Full Member

    I came on this thread hoping to add my happiness that I may not have to work 9 years longer than I signed up to for no benefit whilst paying 4K a year extra, losing 30k off my agreed terms and losing 12k a year for 9 years extra I had to work due to the hard work of my union and the solidarity of the members in the face of a hostile and dishonest government, complicit employers, cowardly and grasping contemporaries all backed up by a vile media that thinks nothing of bare faced lies.

    Unfortunately I found a bunch of bitter idiots with chips on their shoulders that seem to resent those of us who dare to stick up for ourselves.

    Don’t forget that this was a legal case and the government was found to have discriminated against a group of workers. Nothing to do with conditions, beds, shifts, pay, etc. Discrimination.

    It would have been nice if it wasn’t just us and the judges that decided to stick up for ourselves as we might have got here sooner. No matter, i’m Sure plenty will now jump on our shoulders. Don’t worry though as the fitness tests we now have to pass (or face the sack) mean we should be able to carry you, even if the governments own research suggests we won’t be able to post 55.

    Sorry if this is a bit rambling but i’ve Had a few drinks to celebrate the possibility that I may get the chance to retire in 10 years on the terms I signed up to.

    F you on here who react to our achievements with envy and bitterness. If you got up off your knees for a minute you might achieve something yourself.

    Watty
    Full Member

    ^^^ well said. There’s far too much bitterness from the ‘I haven’t got what you have, so I begrudge you having it’ brigade. Well done the FBU.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    I feel your pain public sector workers…strike on and don’t let anyone undermine your solidarity brothers.

    https://www.moneywise.co.uk/news/2018-08-28/public-sector-pensions-triple-the-size-private-sector-counterparts

    “research from campaign group the Taxpayers’ Alliance has found.”

    That’ll be lies and misinformation then.

    Whenever the idea of ‘gold plated’ Public Sector pensions come up, one thing that’s rarely mentioned is the cost – it’s pretty high to say the least, I’m pretty sure if those of us in the private section would be happy to hand over 9% of our pre-tax income (rates vary depending on income level) into a private pension for 30 years (that’s 9% of our own money, not 5% topped up by our employer) we’d be “sitting pretty” too.

    The truth is that most UK employees want a decent pension from their employer, but would rather not pay for it, millions of people we’re dragged kicking and screaming into auto-enrolment and even then millions of them opted out.

    mefty
    Free Member

    The cost of a scheme which pays out after one 30 years is much more than 9% per annum, which frankly buys you bugger all.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Unfortunately I found a bunch of bitter idiots with chips on their shoulders that seem to resent those of us who dare to stick up for ourselves.

    Quite. I’ve been on strike to protect my pension, and would do so again.

    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    Mefty, everyone on the 30 year scheme paid significantly more than 9%.

    monkeysfeet
    Free Member

    Us cops love the firebrigade/waterfairies. Who else is there to look up to us in awe…
    (Seriously, bravo the FBU. And more importantly a big thank you to all who are working this Xmas)

    winston
    Free Member

    “Whenever the idea of ‘gold plated’ Public Sector pensions come up, one thing that’s rarely mentioned is the cost ”

    No you’re right they don’t….

    I’m neither bitter nor an idiot but people need to know this is a zero sum game and the money needs to come from somewhere and it will be our children by both taxation and reduced services.

    http://www.pensions-expert.com/DB-Derisking/Should-we-be-worried-about-public-sector-pensions?ct=true

    “The government had £1.3tn in unfunded public sector DB pension liabilities at the end of March 2016. Teachers, firefighters and doctors are among the public sector workers who fall under the umbrella.”

    Kudos for looking after yourselves and fighting for what you believe is your rightful inheritance but don’t get all shouty with me if I don’t share your joy. Emotions like ‘jealousy’ and ‘envy’ don’t come into it.

    johnners
    Free Member

    Kudos for looking after yourselves and fighting for what you believe is your rightful inheritance but don’t get all shouty with me if I don’t share your joy.

    Some people are going to get what they were told they would get when they signed up to the job, and some who were going to face discrimination now won’t. I’m not a fireman but I feel a bit of joy about that.

    chestrockwell
    Full Member

    It’s not a ‘rightful inheritance’, it’s the conditions that we signed up to and to which we kept our side of the bargain. Various governments spent our pension pot when there was huge surplus so excuse me for not feeling sorry that they now have a bill to pay.

    This ruling does not mean everyone in the Public Sector will go back on to cast iron, gold plated (etc, etc) pensions, it means people who have been proven in law to have been discriminated against by their employer should get justice. It won’t close the new career average schemes and will not mean we all move on to a 30 year final salary. Since 2006 new starters have been on a 40 year scheme anyway.

    highlandman
    Free Member

    Congrats to the firemen and please accept my best wishes. There is far too much abuse of public sector workers taking place, both here on the forum and out in the world. One for the critics on here: if we were to arbitrarily take away 20% of your future income and tell you that you will have to wait to get that, would you be pleased? Again, I signed up over 30 years ago to a scheme that ‘promised’ certain benefits at age 60, which I will not now receive until at least 67 but at a significantly reduced rate. in my early years, we were told by the employer and the government of the day that our pension of the future would make up for the repeated under inflation pay rises given out year after year. Now, like the firemnen, the pensions have been undermined. I for one would simply tax the vast off-shore profits and assets of both the multi-nationals and the privileged. We’ve plenty of money for vanity projects like refurbing Westminster or Crossrail but none at all when nurses or civil servants have suffered over ten years of pay cuts.
    Just don’t get me started on foodbanks, Universal Credit sanctions and the associated abuse of whole sections of society.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    chestrockwell

    Member

    It’s not a ‘rightful inheritance’, it’s the conditions that we signed up to and to which we kept our side of the bargain.

    Yup, basically this simple.

    Also, this is more or less an aside but remember this next time the government claim that emergency service strikes put people at risk- in this case, the FBU strike was in pursuit of something that we now know was actually a legal obligation. it should never have led to a strike, or in fact a dispute at all- if the government had conducted themselves properly and lawfully they wouldn’t have pulled this shit in the first place. All responsibility for that risk they claim exist, can only lie with them

    ransos
    Free Member

    I’m neither bitter nor an idiot but people need to know this is a zero sum game and the money needs to come from somewhere and it will be our children by both taxation and reduced services.

    Yes, complying with the law sometimes costs money.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    You can’t retire people at 55 on a decent pension when life expectancy is 80 odd years. It’s just not affordable. Something has to give.

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    people need to know this is a zero sum game and the money needs to come from somewhere and it will be our children by both taxation and reduced services.

    This. People complain about austerity and then want to pay healthy 55 year olds to play golf for the rest of their lives.

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    You can’t retire people at 55 on a decent pension when life expectancy is 80 odd years. It’s just not affordable. Something has to give.

    Ridiculous statement. This was the remuneration package agreed by both parties at the outset. Erroding the value of the package is simply a deferred paycut, cynically calculated to receive less resistance than an immediate pay cut. This has worked with the NHS, sadly, due to weak unions and a disunited workforce. Bravo to the FBU for having the courage and staying power to stand up for its members rights, and bravo to the FBU members for not falling for the anti union rhetoric that is so prevalent in workplaces these days. Well done.

    If you disagree, say so. If you want to start calling names at least do it with conviction, you coward.

    I disagree; see above. I also think you are portraying yourself as a nasty, jealous, angry and small minded person, which I don’t think you always do. So that’s a shame.

    Drac
    Full Member

    You can’t retire people at 55 on a decent pension when life expectancy is 80 odd years. It’s just not affordable. Something has to give.

    Yes. Tax avoidance, tax loops holes, unnecessary projects such as the nuclear missile replacements, bribing DUP, paying billions to leave a market that makes us billions and if need be a small increase on personal tax.

    Still it’s far better make them work until they’re nearly 70 so chances are they’ll die soon after retirement or suffering a life changing illness so costing the tax payer more. But that’s Ok as it’s their fault the government broke the law.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    And would have cost less money, had they done so in the first place rather than dragging it out for years

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    But that’s Ok as it’s their fault the government broke the law.

    Eh?

    outofbreath
    Free Member

    And would have cost less money, had they done so in the first place rather than dragging it out for years

    Although we’re told “This has worked with the NHS, sadly, due to weak unions and a disunited workforce”. So seemingly worth a punt.

    (Teachers got their pensions reduced as well, to my direct cost, so perhaps it worked on them too.)

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    So seemingly worth a punt.

    To make pecuniary gain from illegal and immoral endeavour? Yeah, that’s just what I expect of my government.
    There’s a good chance that if you walk out of Tesco without paying for a couple of bottles of scotch you’ll get away with it; worth a punt too?

    project
    Free Member

    Best wishes to the fire fighters for their win, unless the governmnet goes to appeal.

    But where is the extra cash going to be coming from, the fire service has seen huge cutbacks and reduced staffing is there any more to cut to save cash to pay it out on pensions.

    bruneep
    Full Member

    Andrew Short QC, Lydia Seymour and Naomi Ling have been successful in the Court of Appeal in the claims of more than 200 judges and 6000 firefighters for age discrimination, equal pay and race discrimination.

    The Court of Appeal held that transitional protections that sheltered older judges and firefighters from the significant reductions in pensions entitlements which the claimants suffered as a result of the public sector pensions changes in 2015, were unlawfully discriminatory.

    It made findings on the correct approach to take to the exercise of objective justification where the state has a legitimate interest in the issue. It also held that the desire to protect older judges/firefighters when they would have been least affected by the 2015 changes was ‘irrational’ and that the absence of evidence supporting this aim meant that there was no basis on which it could have been found to be legitimate.

    The Court of Appeal also found that the age protection was indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex and race and gave guidance on the application of the Supreme Court judgments of Essop and Naeem.

    Permission to appeal has not been granted.

    The full judgment is available to read here.

    https://www.outertemple.com/2018/12/court-of-appeal-success-for-judges-and-firefighters/?fbclid=IwAR2reDnfCcz1NDa6bZfuDhKh15y9N4MjYmRr3tLp9MvU3YVR_xYtB-KMBvw

    supercarp
    Full Member

    I find it quite funny when people complain about fire and police pensions. Moaning about their private sector pensions been so poor.

    To me front line emergency services and the military pensions should be a special case and pay well. It is the reward for working nights missing special occasions, children’s birthdays etc. It is the reward for being assaulted, shot, trying to save a life.

    The fact many people complain about this shows what a sad horrible society we have become. We have around 500,000 front line line staff not really a huge amount.

    I didn’t join the police to get rich and I certainly didn’t join for the pension but I saw it as the reward for the huge personal till it takes on you and your family.

    And working to 55 is pretty fair when you have to carry fire equipment, people or arrest some drugged up violent 20 year old.

    Everything seems to be a race to the bottom these days.

    DT78
    Free Member

    Well done FBU.

    What does this mean for other services who’s pension suffered the same changes (increase % and change of retirement age to NRA currently 68)

    Flood gates open and reinstatement of original terms when you signed the contract¿

    Drac
    Full Member

    Precisely Supercarp.

    Drac
    Full Member

    I had a brain melt late last year it put me off for months I’ll never fully recover the damage is decades old. I have small moments every now and then occasionally more than once a day everyday. I’m better at controlling it now I’m aware but I know I’m only one memory or one shit job from entering another deep and dark pit.

    This little blog sums it up.

    ‘Unless You Work In The Emergency Services…’ | Guest Blog

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    We are all (I’m talking specifically ambo but not excluding other jobs, it’s just what I know) damaged by our job, Drac, and in ways we, let alone others don’t fully understand or realise I think. Recently (and I’m sure you’ll relate) I’ve come to realise just how differently we react to stuff compared to folk in ‘normal’ jobs. Sometimes it feels like I can’t feel emotions like other people any more; sort of cold and dead inside, other times I feel almost normal. It **** you up, our job. If you ever need to talk to someone who’s a stranger but will understand, inbox me bud.

    Drac
    Full Member

    Precisely that I can appear cold at times not having any emotions but it’s probably the polar opposite haven been told for years to not show them as it means your weak and shouldn’t be in the job. Thankfully those days are pretty much over and staff are much more open.

    Cheers V8 and likewise as that’s what my job now involves.

    firestarter
    Free Member

    We were always told we were in the wrong job in both the army and fire service if anything bothered you, it is changing now but it’s still not great.

    I’ve seen mass graves at 17 years old, ive done 3 tours of Bosnia and carried countless bodies from fires and car crashes. My way of dealing is by trying to just treat a person as a thing, hard with kids though especially when you have your own. Emotionally I’m pretty wrecked in all honesty, my dad said I was never the same after my best mate died next to me when we were both 17 in the army.
    But that’s a whole other thread, fingers crossed this is a good win for us, enjoy your Christmas I’m working nights christmas eve and day so get to see the kids open presents this year between nights, if they can wait til half eight lol

    Drac
    Full Member

    I’m back in Monday for 4 days at hopefully just 12 hours a day comes with the job but having been out today buying more presents and food I’m not really feeling it.

    firestarter
    Free Member

    Hope you have a reasonable tour mate I won’t say good, I know better than that haha

    bruneep
    Full Member

    also back on monday, tuesday will be a struggle this year for us

    Drac
    Full Member

    Hahah! I love that meme popped up the last few years.

    hopeforthebest
    Free Member

    Taxpayers Alliance is not a campaign group or membership driven group. It’s a lobbying/campaigning front for its odious and secretive right wing donors. It’s a couple f shills in a Westminster office. You cannot accept anything they say at face value.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Always think that’s quite revealing- groups campaigning for, frinstance, workers rights are generally totally open about it. Groups campaigning against it tend to dress themselves up as something else entirely- Taxpayer’s Alliance being the perfect example. I reckon a good starting point in deciding what side you want to be on, is looking at the ones that’ll tell you what they’re trying to achieve, and the ones that’ll try very hard to hide it

    Lummox
    Full Member

    High five to other Fbu members and let’s hope it’s as good a result as we hope. Devil is in the details.

    Fingers crossed this will benefit all the other services who the government have smashed the conditions of service.

    To those displaying hostility towards us/the fbu/ public sector, please remember

    It was determined in court the government acted illegally. No ifs, no buts.

    Two separate occasions in court that only came about after lengthy attempts at discussions followed by last resort strikes before it was imposed.

    I fell into the unprotected band with 15 years in the old scheme before being told I’ll have to work and contribute 10 years more to receive substantially less in the end – they tore up my pension contract and imposed a new one. Instead of 30 years it was now 40 whereas older colleagues on the same course as me were either fully protected, tapered protection or like me shafted. Based purely on age, not length of service.

    I hope those within the service that didn’t support the actions and decided to profit are feeling that pang of guilt, but I doubt it as the ruling applies for them too.

    And any private company ‘resilience’ firefighter reading this, You disgust me profiteering off the back of this. I’ve met your ilk and I hope you never get to pull on a tunic and play fire service again.

    *** written whilst on nights***

    To those working over Christmas, I hope you get to spend some quality time with your loved ones. Stay safe and get home again.

    sadexpunk
    Full Member

    and of course, not a mention on the news, same as when we were striking in london and brought westminster to a standstill. cant be having that made common knowledge…..

Viewing 38 posts - 41 through 78 (of 78 total)

The topic ‘FBU win legal challenge for pensions.’ is closed to new replies.