• This topic has 27 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by Earl.
Viewing 28 posts - 1 through 28 (of 28 total)
  • Faster 2.6 tire out there …… ?
  • jeb
    Full Member

    Hello

    looking for a faster, lighter 2.6 tire, riding mainly flatter singletrack….. bike setup, is a Pivot mach 6, 155mm frame, 170 mm fork …..
    If you have fx have a link to a test with rolling resistance, watt etc would be great!

    Thanks

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    Lighter and faster than what?

    davewalsh
    Free Member

    On my Soul at the moment I’m running a DHF front and Conti Cross-King rear. I find this a nice fast combo without it being too flimsy. Prior to this I had an Ardent Race on the back and although the Conti is heavier, it definitely rolls faster.

    whitestone
    Free Member

    Vittoria Mezcal? Fast rolling but not sure if it’s light as it’s the only 2.6″ tyre I have used. Definitely a dry weather tyre though – or quite exciting in mud!

    jeb
    Full Member

    I have not ridden a 2.6 before, but it was just getting some feedback about a lighter tire…. i rather sacrifice some grip, to get a lighter tire, faster rolling….

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    But what rear tyre do you have now?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    Maxxis Rekon Plus 2.8 in use on the rear of my bike on dry trails … it’s really a 2.6 … light and fast. Well, much less slow than the 2.6 tyres I tried. Less tread, but plenty of volume.

    BearBack
    Free Member

    I’d be surprised if bicycle rolling resistance have done anything beyond full fat for resistance measurements.
    Once you come off race tires the interest of rolling resistance numbers for these mid fats/chubby/slight portly 2.6-2.8 tyres is largely lost for most.

    As above though, the 2.6 cross king doesn’t feel like a penalty over much of the knobbier 2.4/2.5 rubber.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    If weight is your driver, and you ride flat singletrack, stick to 2.3 or thereabouts.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Bugs me that none of the big names do a semi-slick, I’d be all over a 2.6 rock razor…

    I liked the Cross King but after maybe 5 or 6 rides I discovered it’d lost some knobs and when they ripped off they tore right back to the carcass. Warrantied it without fuss, tbh I think I was just using it in a way conti didn’t intend it to be (on the back of an enduro bike), shame though as I liked it up til that point.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Oh, so there is! I need 29er but if I was the OP that’s what I’d get.

    mmannerr
    Full Member

    Spec Ground Control 2.6” is a nice balance between good grip and low rolling resistance.
    Ikon 2.6” id available too.

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    rekon here, too. 2.6 F&R, come up 2.5 on a 35mm rim

    filks
    Full Member

    Had a Rekon 2.6 out back. Fast rolling but no grip on anything other than hardpack. Found it too scary and changed it sharpish

    excalibur
    Full Member

    Another shout for the Conti Cross King (22.5×2.6). Rolls well and true to size meaning it didn’t really fit in my rear stays. So selling on after one ride out! PM me if interested.

    cookci
    Free Member

    Currently running 29 ×2.6 rekon max tera front and 29 2.6 ikon max speed

    Rolling resistance isn’t particularly amazing tbh however grip on the other hand is pretty good so it’s a good compromise overall

    I’d be interested to try a 2.6 semi slick also

    I wonder if the forkaster 2.6 max speed would run any faster on the front

    excalibur
    Full Member

    I’m running a Forekaster rear now as it fits better at just under 2.5 inches which is grippier (better braking) but a fair bit slower than the Conti CK I tried.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    I just don’t understand why you’d want a 2.6” tyre for riding flatter singletrack when you have 155mm of rear suspension. Steep and loose trails, sure, flatter trails on a hardtail, fine, but together it really doesn’t make sense.

    hols2
    Free Member

    Ikon, Tail Boss, Hans Dampf

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Steep and loose trails, sure, flatter trails on a hardtail, fine, but together it really doesn’t make sense.

    I agree.

    We’ve a 6Fattie in the house. We’ve tried some (half worn) Trail Boss 2.6’s on and when things get more challenging its a bit too space hopper. It’s slow on flat. Noticeably a touch harder to pedal.
    Pop some 2.4 Der Barons on front and rear and the thing is an absolute monster truck of grip and controllable. Yet not noticeably draggy.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Oh – my theory is in the larger tyre is as much about sidewalls as compound, and that pressures are mega sensitive.

    Kuco
    Full Member

    The Purgatory and Butcher tyres that came with my stock with my Specialized seems to roll pretty quick.

    jeb
    Full Member

    Hello !

    My tire setup is :

    Continental 2.3 cross king protection front

    Schwalbe nobby nic 2.35 rear

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    “Continental 2.3 cross king protection front

    Schwalbe nobby nic 2.35 rear”

    Swap them around! The Nobby Nic has more grip, the X-King rolls faster. They’re very light and fast tyres for a Mach 6 but if you haven’t been crashing on every turn or pinch-flatting them then they work for you. But they’ll be much better swapped around.

    I’m assuming they’re decent compounds and not the el cheapo plastic ones!

    Earl
    Free Member

    Just replaced a 2.3 ground control grid with a 2.6 slaughter grid. Much much faster up/flat/down despite 200g extra.

Viewing 28 posts - 1 through 28 (of 28 total)

The topic ‘Faster 2.6 tire out there …… ?’ is closed to new replies.