Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • FAO K100 SS riders
  • AndrewBF
    Free Member

    Out of interest, what ratio did you use?

    postierich
    Free Member

    32:17 with proper normal wheels!

    Chevin
    Free Member

    Jon H. rode round on 32/19 with proper normal 29" wheels.
    Amy also rode 32/19 with proper normal 29" wheels.

    Matthew

    MrSparkle
    Full Member

    Last year did it on 32 x 16 on 26".

    luked2
    Free Member

    36:21 on 29" wheels.

    Seemed about right with just a few bits I couldn't get up, and still managing a reasonable pace on the fire roads.

    Until about mile 95 that is, when I started going very slowly indeed, although that was fixed with a fig roll!

    martp
    Free Member

    32:16 with normal wheels and Rigid 😯

    Clink
    Full Member

    32:18 29er rigid – cleared all climbs except one loose, steep zig-zag and one of trail centre climbs at end on loose sand/rocks – I could hardly walk up it!

    AndrewBF
    Free Member

    Thx all. Some useful pointers there for a training bike I'm considering.

    samuri
    Free Member

    34:18 on 26" although I normally ride 34:16 on that bike. I thought it would be a good good idea to ease it up a bit and what a good idea that was!

    miketually
    Free Member

    32:18 on a 29er, this year. (About the same as 32:16 on a 26er.)
    32:17 on a 26er, last year.

    There's quite a lot of climbing, but you also need the slightly higher gear for the gravelly tracks. I decided to trade off getting off to walk a little earlier against a slightly higher top speed.

    martinh
    Free Member

    34:21 on my 29er. Ran 34:19 last year but thought I'd make it a little easier. I've always been better at spinning for speed than powering up climbs so it suited me well

    simplesi
    Free Member

    32:18 on a rigid 29er, may run 32:19/20 next year

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘FAO K100 SS riders’ is closed to new replies.