dangeourbrain
Governor general did that, not the queen and whilst arguably poorly done it was too solve the sort of shutdown for which Trump’s USA is now becoming well known.
Also technically he only *really* dismissed the PM from that role (which they occupy at the request of the Gov. Gen) and appointed another, Frazer, who passed the appropriations then requested to dissolve the Govt for an election of both houses, a request which was granted…
The Governor-General is the Queen’s representative and he consulted with her. He used her powers, he has none of his own to do that.
And dismissing a PM from a majority party and replacing him with the leader of the opposition party is hardly just a technicality.
The Queen may dissolve our govt in a similar manner because she is the one with power to do so, but here she does so by following the lead of parliament.
With the Brexit impasse looming, can you imagine the queen replacing Theresa May with Jeremy Corbyn without an election or prior approval of the majority of the house?
athgray
Oh no, surely not the 17th century again.
Don’t blame me for that, dangeourbrain started it. 🙂