That’s the way I’m leaning now. I have geometry confusion though! Am convinced that relatively steep head angles and short wheelbases are best around most of our local trails but likewise I think I’ll be much safer with a slack front end over in Cwmcarn, Afan, etc, or on the local cheeky DH tracks. So I liked the idea of a bike that can run 100-160mm adjustable forks – like the 456 (carbon preferably) or BFe. Further investigation has revealed that only the beefiest TALAS / U-turn forks have that range of adjustment (unless I’ve missed something) and those big forks would be overkill for me, which means the Soul is back in the running, so right now it’s 16″ Carbon 456 vs 17.5″ Soul, with Fox TALAS 32 100-140.
Just trying to suss out how both compare at 100mm to my Boardman, I think the Soul is maybe 1 degree slacker and the 456 a bit more, but between unsagged vs sagged measurements, different % sag and different quoted fork length it’s very hard to get a definitive answer! Of course the solution is to ride both but if I could then I wouldn’t be thinking about it so much…