Getting back to the OP, the nominal power must be 250W to comply with bicycle regulations but the way nominal power is technically defined it is averaged over a fairly significant period of time, I read the actual specifications once a few years ago but I forget the details, anyhow, what it means it is possible to have peak powers above 250W whilst still passing the approval test.
Anyway it seems there are two specifications that are important.
Torque – Basically do you have to be pedalling fast to get the maximum power. 90Nm (I assume at the crank) equates to 565W at 60RPM, so it seems you’ve got the peak power on tap even for slower pedalling.
Power curve – What is the peak power and how long is this held for before ramping down the power to maintain the 250W nominal power. I don’t really remember the details but the test specification was something along the lines of remaining below 250W average measured over a half hour period on on 100% throttle measured after a warm up period of about 20 minutes on a 70% throttle setting.
What I did remember was that due to the approval test specification being prescriptive it’d be possible to programme in a test defeat protocol but of course the ethics of this would bad just like the whole VW emissions scandal.
I’m slightly offended by Specialized saying that 240W is 2x Me when I’ve averaged more than that over several hours.