Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 139 total)
  • Driving: What is the tipping point?
  • globalti
    Free Member

    If you accept that every house will have two or more cars, the problem is the huge numbers of houses being built on greenfield sites. Everybody would like to see more houses built on brownfield sites but there are two problems: scum neighbours and proximity of facilities – the old days of the neighbourhood shops, pubs, cinemas and whatever are long gone. The only time it works is in booming cities like Manchester where there are local shops and facilities for younger residents and there’s an over-supply of new-built city apartments, although unfortunately 75% of those (so I’m told) are being sold to investors from places like China wanting a safe haven for their lolly.

    slowoldman
    Full Member

    Well whoever suggested to you that providing improved public transport is curtailing freedom is an idiot, so they can safely be ignored. Same goes for cycling infrastructure. Do it and let people choose.

    kerley
    Free Member

    Cars are fine. People are the problem. Reduce the population by half and we’re good.

    As long as that reduction is all the Brexiters and Tories then yes we certainly would be good.

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middling Edition

    Fresh Goods Friday 696: The Middlin...
    Latest Singletrack Videos
    Flaperon
    Full Member

    Any form of road charging is simply hitting the poorer car owners worst. If you want the roads to be the preserve of the Audi-owning middle classes

    Link it to the VED band (in particular the “prestige” penalty bit). It should be disruptively expensive to EVERYONE to drive short journeys (except motability etc obviously).

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    The government could start to tackle all of those issues,

    Why wait for the government to do anything?

    Change your habits, get people to change theirs.

    zilog6128
    Full Member

    I honestly don’t think there ever will be a solution. Urban population booming as is car ownership, yet in 99% of places there just isn’t the space to add any extra traffic capacity.

    No government is ever going to implement wide-ranging punitive action or “waste” significant money on public transport etc as it wouldn’t be popular.

    All you can do I think is look out for yourself, adjust your work/lifestyle to avoid car journeys at peak times, let everyone else get stressed 😎

    Bunnyhop
    Full Member

    Agree with the OP

    I’m so lucky that my local independent shops have everything I need and a 5 minute walk away.

    Driving a car for me isn’t an enjoyable experience. Too many people ignoring basic rules of the road and they don’t care about anyone else. They’re too quick to be aggressive if you drive at the speed limit, or don’t do something quickly enough.

    Agree with comments about public transport being too expensive. Also the comments about building on green belt, where you have to have a car because there are no facilities, or public transport. There are plenty of brownfield sites, where the much needed affordable housing can be built, with good infrastructure and amenities.

    We’re thinking of selling our car, but will still need one.

    It’s annoying to see a close neighbour walk her children to school, yet the neighbour next door fires up the old diesel Cayenne to take her child to the same school and always bobs to the shops in it.

    For me it’s the worry about pollution levels. Since building the A555 airport relief road, the pollution levels in the surrounding area (that includes us) have rocketed. The locals have clubbed together to buy equipment to measure it.

    johnners
    Free Member

    “Man in car complains about traffic” could be a Daily Mash story

    It’s more like “Man in car complains traffic makes it difficult to drive his multiple children to discretionary activities in 3 different locations” – and you have to bear in mind SR’s probably one of the more self-aware people complaining about traffic levels.

    There are no easy ways back from where we are to something more sustainable, pricing strategies are probably the best bet but would have to be led by massive improvement in public transport or it would simply be pricing poorer citizens out of mobility. And with so much vested interest in the status quo I can’t see anything like that making headway. I’m not optimistic tbh.

    stevextc
    Free Member

    Why wait for the government to do anything?

    Change your habits, get people to change theirs.

    My child’s primary school won’t accept unaccompanied kids.
    Neither will most of his activities.

    Loads of other stuff is “must be accompanied by an adult” … or “your child must be dropped off and picked up by an adult”

    retro83
    Free Member

    an acceptance by employers that it’s ok for people to work form home if they are able.

    xora

    This very much, I am lucky to work for a company where 90% of staff work remotely. But still some managers are obsessed with putting bums on seats in our Cambridge office even though everyone else in those peoples teams is sat at home working.

    I personally found the problem with that is working on your own all day is depression-inducing levels of loneliness/boredom. One or two days a week might work.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    From my house to my son’s football and my daughter’s ballet (they’re in the same direction), it was, without exaggeration, bumper-to-bumper cars in both directions.

    The question is – who are all those other drivers and where have they driven from. For you the journey is congested from home to destination – thats why you regularly make the decision to travel by other means. But for the majority of other people in that queue will have travelled from further afield because cities by their nature draw in large numbers of people from their hinterland everyday- they live or work further from their destination than you do. They’re the cause of the congestion – but for them the congestion is only a blip in a longer trouble free  journey. They see the city as the cause of the congestion and it reinforces their idea that their life in the suburbs and satellite towns is more convenient even though they can only make it work if they drive- they don’t dwell on the  incovenience of travelling in a city being something they’ve brought with them.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    Anyway. Its all because of women’s liberation.

    🙂

    bigyim
    Free Member

    As the band slaves once said.

    “You’re not sat in traffic. You are traffic”

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    I personally found the problem with that is working on your own all day is depression-inducing levels of loneliness/boredom.

    I’ve often thought  there will ultimately be a market for  local high street remote working offices. We need to use all those boarded up shops for something, right?

    Places you can walk to from your house with desks and chairs and fast internet where  you can work remotely from your employer, close to home but still interact with other people, all doing the same thing, throughout the day.

    The remote office provider  could provide a report to your employer of your attendance and timekeeping to keep them happy that you’re not spending your day watching Homes under the Hammer or furiously masturbating.

    DT78
    Free Member

    part of the problem is all these unnecessary journeys, such as taking your kids to activities that require driving in rush hour….(I have 2 young ones, I’ll probably end up being the same)

    Big culture shift needed:
    Bring in charge per mile
    Bring in offpeak / peak costs
    Enforce staggered starts/ends across cities for schools / councils etc where possible
    Give employees the right to vary start and end times where possible
    Incentivise companies to reduce miles travelled by employees (home working etc..)
    Decentralise London / other big cities, starting with civil service
    Big incentives like super cheap business rates for dispersed employers
    invest in better cycling / scootering infrastructure
    subsidise season tickets for buses and trains

    They were planning on a commuter zone type thing for my city, Southampton, which I was really looking forward to – mainly aimed at diesals, so we bought a cheap petrol (see behaviour change…due to cost). But then they have shelved it for some rubbish reason. I’m sure it would have had an impact in improving the cities air pollution. (though the big issue is still the cruise ships not having onshore power..)

    HoratioHufnagel
    Free Member

    The whole country has been designed around car ownership and use, and *most* people will always take the easiest option.

    It’ll take a generation to change, and very strong leadership, or some kind of oil/energy crisis.

    johnners
    Free Member

    to keep them happy that you’re not spending your day watching Homes under the Hammer or furiously masturbating

    I’m hoping they’d be OK with cheerfully masturbating.

    perchypanther
    Free Member

    I’m hoping they’d be OK with cheerfully masturbating.

    …well, i suppose you are getting paid for it.

    DT78
    Free Member

    We need to use all those boarded up shops for something, right?

    more housing?
    good idea by the way, though not just the high street, any commercial site that needs redeveloping – all the disappearing local corner shops / pubs etc… could be used. Mix with some sort of youth club and your tackling a couple of social problems with one stone

    wobbliscott
    Free Member

    here is not too many cars on the road at all
    I’ve read some stupid words on here in my time.. but lordy (!), that is a classic. 😆

    Nice one. Take part of what I said and ridicule it. Nice way to conduct a sensible constructive discussion. My actual point which you’ve not picked up on, was that the problem was not necessarily the quantity of cars on the road but the concentration. You have miles of tailbacks on some roads, but empty roads just a stones throw away. If the traffic was shared more equally on the existing infrastructure (let alone building more) then the congestion could easily be eased in many parts of the country. Ovviously not London. London is screwed but there is hope elsewhere in the country.

    And despite your ignorant dismissal the fact remains There IS plenty of space on the road network…just not linking where people are and where they need to get to. There are many ways to tackle this before you get to the draconian suggestion of banning cars which truly is stupid.

    Cars are brilliant things, they give people freedom, convenience and enable them to be more productive in their lives which are things people will always value and place increasing value on going forward. We can look at our habits…there is no sensible reason in this day and age to concentrate people in large cities, living and working there causing these high population densities. Spread things out a bit. reduce the concentration. 93% of our land is untouched. We have 60 million people crammed into less than 7% of the land area. I think we can invest in a small amount of land which could make a huge difference. Small things like companies staggering their start and finish times can help to ease congestion in local areas at rush hours.

    And a cracker is our local council seems to think that morning rush hour is the best time to send out their road gutter sweeping trucks to clear the gutters and drains causing miles of tailbacks in the morning rush hour. Not sure who’s bright ideal in the local council offices that was.

    tinybits
    Free Member

    I’ve often thought there will ultimately be a market for local high street remote working offices. We need to use all those boarded up shops for something, right?

    Places you can walk to from your house with desks and chairs and fast internet where you can work remotely from your employer, close to home but still interact with other people, all doing the same thing, throughout the day.

    This will only work if people can drive close to it and park easily. After all, town and city centres are not exactly renowned for being places that people walk to and from are they (see the traffic in any city at a weekend!)

    So, this looks like a problem for a person living in a major city, going along a main commuter route, almost thinking that everyone else is insane for doing what they themselves are also doing. If only the others weren’t, surely there would be less cars to get in the way of theirs….
    My commute was lovely. From the car parked on my drive, beautiful sunshine and fairly empty roads, listening to the Infinite monkey cage pod cast about dinosaurs as I drove down the Cheddar Gorge and then into my parking place at work. Completely stress free. I suspect I’d feel differently if I lived in a city again, but then I didn’t bother having a car when I last did live in a city… It’s also be a little difficult to have all my staff working remotely as there is a factory full of expensive machinery that sort of has to stay in the same place!

    nach
    Free Member

    Hello SaxonRider, no, you’re not wrong and yes, it is insane.

    Got rid of my car nearly twenty years ago and haven’t looked back. I have to rent or borrow a couple of times a year at most, and I HATE it. Around 50% of urban space is dedicated to cars, and that seems to be invisible to most people. If it’s not frustrated people crawling around in bumper-to-bumper single occupancy boxes, it’s idiots distracted by their phones. From the the roads to the facebook comments, there’s something about driving that fundamentally seems to break people’s brains.

    scruff
    Free Member

    Its all total bollocks. I worry about cycling with my children to school, there are cars everywhere, the narrow path between two fields gets blocked by people walking or cycling and gets overgrown with nettles, the council only have the funding to cut it once a year (yes I do log it with them that it needs a cut) but the grass verges along the side of the road get cut all the time. The design / funding for everything is all just wrong for alternatives to driving so it just encourages car use. I work a few miles from home (in an NHS acute hospital) cycling is is viewed as a very very strange thing to do, car parking on site is a huge revenue earner and everyone just sucks up the cost and hassle of parking as there aren’t enough spaces. On the way in its often bedlam at some places as I pass two primary and two high schools, cars, trucks and buses blocking each others path buses and school kids trying to cross the roads anywhere possible. The school doesn’t help as you often have to carry a homemade cardboard castle, a PE kit, lunch, school bag and a trumpet in with you.

    Daffy
    Full Member

    I hate driving these days, it’s just tiresome and avoid it as much as possible, and the less you drive, the more you hate it when you do have to.

    This. Ignoring trips up north to see relatives and friends, my mileage has dropped from 7000 miles per year to around 1000. I use the bike for almost everything. It now feels shameful to sue the car for short trips or even to commute.

    phil5556
    Full Member

    I haven’t read it all, I’ll catch up later in my break.

    But I “had” to drop my car off at the garage this morning, they wanted it for 9am. And the traffic was terrible! I’m lucky that most of commuting is outside rush hour, I couldn’t sit in that every day.

    I am however guilty of using the car a lot for convenience, it’s a 40ish minute walk in to town and I do find I often just jump in the car to make a quick and easy trip. Luckily where I live isn’t congested badly – yet.

    I really should make more of an effort to walk and jump on the bike instead.

    Public transport to work is do able but not easy, I can’t get there in time for a lot of my shifts and what take under 45 minutes in the car becomes at least 1hr15 by train & walking.

    I did choose to move 30 miles from work though so…. I guess I I’m part of the problem. And I can’t work from home as I need to look out the window.

    DezB
    Free Member

    My actual point which you’ve not picked up on, was that the problem was not necessarily the quantity of cars on the road but the concentration.

    Oh, I picked up on it. Just thought it was ridiculous. Doesn’t matter where the hell all these cars are, there are too many of them. Polluting cities, killing and injuring people, stopping other forms of transport from being feasible… etc etc. Too many cars. FUll **** stop.

    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    Why, oh why can’t we just look at places with good transport infrastructure and imitate them?

    Because we’ve built a world where people believe that owning personal motorised transport is a right and, at the same time, built our lifestyles and infrastructure around it.

    It’s so heavily entrenched that instead of looking at alternatives to cars full stop, we’re simply switching technologies. So we’ll have roads clogged with electric cars still producing tyre rubber debris and brake dust and complete with sustainability issues all of their own – how many batteries? How many charging stations? How many acres of charging points per motorway service area? How much additional load on the National Grid?

    It won’t stop until we both change our life expectations and behaviour – no, you don’t have to drive to the Lake District to go for a bike ride and you’re entitled to do it either. And we provide efficient public transport and infrastructure that makes cycling and walking attractive for short journeys.

    The omly way that’s going to happen is from the top as an uncompromising, committed government policy. Don’t hold your breath. First past the post means the Greens have minimal influence over national policy and for other parties, it’s all just peripheral.

    Tipping point? Probably somewhere down the line when we’ve actually made the planet uninhabitable so we can have more phones, more concrete, more plastic etc. Oh, and more cars obviously. And bigger roads to drive them on.

    globalti
    Free Member

    The shockingly inadequate state of public transport is to blame for a lot of road congestion. Gti Junior is working in that London for his 3rd year and is really impressed with the transport in the south-east although even that gets shaky from time to time when trains or buses don’t turn up. By comparison rail services in the north are a disaster.

    Many formerly small villages that were cut off by Beeching now have enough estate dwellers that the lines could be reopened and run as commuter lines with fast, light, modern rail vehicles.

    TurnerGuy
    Free Member
    jam-bo
    Full Member

    Many formerly small villages that were cut off by Beeching now have enough estate dwellers that the lines could be reopened and run as commuter lines with fast, light, modern rail vehicles.

    https://www.devonlive.com/news/devon-news/reopening-bere-alston-tavistock-railway-3311504

    £93,000,000 apparently to reinstate ~5 miles of track

    zilog6128
    Full Member

    Many formerly small villages that were cut off by Beeching now have enough estate dwellers that the lines could be reopened and run as commuter lines with fast, light, modern rail vehicles.

    even better and a lot cheaper would be nice wide, surfaced cyle/walking paths with (electric) city-bike and/or scooter hire stations.

    xora
    Full Member

    £93,000,000 apparently to reinstate ~5 miles of track

    Thats because someone has to pay for the committees to scrutinize the committees to scrutinize the committees …

    Instead of just getting on with the projects. Its the same fate that befalls any infrastructure project in this country.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    Cars are fine. People are the problem. Reduce the population by half and we’re good.

    As long as that reduction is all the Brexiters and Tories then yes we certainly would be good.

    Given the average ages of Tory / Leave voters that’s what’s happening.

    It was said that if the vote had happened a few months later then Remain would have won simply becase of Leave voters dying, or being too infirm to vote and more Reamin voters being old enough to vote.

    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    I personally found the problem with that is working on your own all day is depression-inducing levels of loneliness/boredom. One or two days a week might work.

    Yep, as Perchy says, what we need to do is build alternative frameworks that get around those issues in different ways – local communal offices, social groups etc.

    I listened to an interesting podcast a while back where they spoke to the mayor of a Spanish city that had successfully banned cars. One of the most telling bits was when they asked him if this wasn’t unpopular. His response was that yes, initially it was, but if you provide viable alternatives, people forget about that, use those alternatives and appreciate how much more pleasant it is living in a car-free space.

    I live in a town which was semi-shut down to cars by the recent Whaley Bridge dam thing and, in all honesty, it made the whole place feel so much nicer. People were walking to the shops and work rather than driving because they had to and there was an indefinable calmness about it all. Folk actually talked to each other and interacted rather than competing for road space.

    I think the bigger issue is that the whole ‘cars are freedom’ culture is part of a huge ecological crisis. It’s goes far beyond congestion and pollution – traffic particles in unborn babies, is that the acceptable price to pay for individual freedom to drive to the shops etc?

    BadlyWiredDog
    Full Member

    Given the average ages of Tory / Leave voters that’s what’s happening.

    It was said that if the vote had happened a few months later then Remain would have won simply becase of Leave voters dying, or being too infirm to vote and more Reamin voters being old enough to vote.

    I love how everything, eventually, leads to Brexit.

    kid.a
    Free Member

    Local councils need to make cycling infrastructure MUCH MUCH better and safer, and actually plan it out logically. Yeah it’s been said a thousand times already. But it’s true. And not happening!

    To say I love cycling is an understatement. I do think about bikes most of the time. But I do hate cycling my bike to work now. I’ve been commuting by bike for 8 years, and am truly sick of it. As a very experienced and capable cyclist, I am nearly squished too often. But I let it go and get on with my day. You are never going to convince someone who is normally 99% inactive, and unfit and not cycled for years, to go and play with the traffic like we do.

    There’s often bad accidents involving squished cyclists on the same route I use. You see it shared on social media. And you also see the responses from the general public. That response in the comments section is more terrifying. Really! You’ve got zero chance of convincing anyone out of their cars when they see all this lot.

    It’s not a major city, it’s just a seaside town – Bournemouth. But it’s utter gridlock carnage in rush-hour traffic, and the cycling infrastructure is terrible and dangerously (un)planned.

    If we’re to have any chance of encouraging people to cycle short journeys. They HAVE to build proper, segregated/separated cycle lanes. Lanes that don’t just stop randomly 20ft from the horrendous roundabout where all the poor cyclists are getting squished and reported in the local press. I often wonder, do the idiots who plan these partial lanes ever ride a bike, or give a #### at all.

    I’m on the verge of embarking in bangernomics, and getting myself a little crap car to commute in I’m that sick of it. Trying to resist it. But if nobody else cares….

    andybrad
    Full Member

    people drive because of the status symbol of the car. Look at all the VW vans on here as an example.

    The secondary issue is public transport and the councils encouraging this to businesses. Its cheaper for me to tax (550 quid) insure and run (at 10mpg) a car than it is for me to use a bus for the year! thats not right. The answer isnt to price people out of cars with tax but to make transport cheaper and better. Thats the only way youll get people out of cars.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    The question is – who are all those other drivers and where have they driven from. For you the journey is congested from home to destination – thats why you regularly make the decision to travel by other means. But for the majority of other people in that queue will have travelled from further afield because cities by their nature draw in large numbers of people from their hinterland everyday- they live or work further from their destination than you do. They’re the cause of the congestion – but for them the congestion is only a blip in a longer trouble free journey. They see the city as the cause of the congestion and it reinforces their idea that their life in the suburbs and satellite towns is more convenient even though they can only make it work if they drive- they don’t dwell on the incovenience of travelling in a city being something they’ve brought with them.

    ^^This^^ x1000000000000!

    Urban/Suburban/Rural dwelling, car ownership and public transport access/use are seldom raised as a point for consideration in all of this. That is probably because everyone is looking for a single local, magic bullet to sort the issue. Spending on public transport and cycle/ped routes within a large town or city centre won’t change the fact that a significant amount of the congestion is caused by people traveling in from outer suburbs or further outlying towns/villages where linking bus services are minimal/sporadic and of course probably funded/operated by a different organisation and so those people will default to using a car…

    The other thing is the way we have incorporated the car into our culture it’s not just the “freedom” side of things, not being a car driver can be quite socially excluding when all of your peers simply assume you’ll be able to magically appear for an event 5/10/20 miles away. And of course the car has become as much a statement of personal success and status you couldn’t possibly let the neighbours think you ‘only’ have one or drive an old one…. No wonder they’re heavily marketed and subsidised, our culture is built around car ownership and use; you need to break that part of the culture as much as sorting the logistics moving your workforce about and eliminating unnecessary journeys…

    phil5556
    Full Member

    people drive because of the status symbol of the car. Look at all the VW vans on here as an example.

    I’m not sure they do. They might choose their car based on some desire show their status, but I’d imagine it’s mostly convenience. Some people (myself included) even enjoy driving.

    SaxonRider
    Full Member

    It’s more like “Man in car complains traffic makes it difficult to drive his multiple children to discretionary activities in 3 different locations”

    Oh, I fully recognise the sad irony of what I was posting. To be clear, though: I was not furiously judging others for being in my way; I was despairing over the fact that I was one in a (seeming) million of vehicles all trying to desperately get to their all-important destination.

    I, and my lifestyle unquestionably contribute to the problem; I just try to minimise what I contribute to an absolute minimum level.

    Ultimately, though, when I ask about the “tipping point”, I am really just wondering aloud if all the others on the road don’t also despair… I mean, who could possibly not want to pull a Michael Douglas in Falling Down, when having to do that every single day?!? Or if not a Michael Douglas, then at least try to be part of a solution?

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 139 total)

The topic ‘Driving: What is the tipping point?’ is closed to new replies.