Viewing 11 posts - 81 through 91 (of 91 total)
  • Diesel air pollution…
  • wicki
    Free Member

    How many people in this thread have young children with asthma type problems and live in a city

    Genuinly interested as it seams all our grand kids from the city have breathing problems.

    andyg1966
    Full Member

    According to Wikipedia VW (and other brands) petrol TSI engines

    “Huge rise of number of emitted exhaust particles”
    Wiki

    So now Petrol engines are bad for particulates.

    Edukator
    Free Member

    That stuff about boats is all very well, Squirrelking except that you are talking about an insignificant number of ships that have any pollution control at all. the vast majority are registered in places with no standards whatsoever. They run on high sulphur heavy fuel oil with no scrubbers. In towns like Marseille the cruise ships are the biggest source of particulate pollution when the wind is in from the habour. There’s just one cruise ship with all the depollution equipment in use and hundreds emitting yellow smoke.

    TSI engines are worse for particulates so the manufacturers are introducing particle filters on them too. Engines won’t meet E6c requirements without them anyhow.

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    So what we’re now saying is that the fossil fuel consuming tin boxes are a bad thing?
    Multiply that by how many of us use them, and we have an issue.

    Who would have guessed?

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    What MOAB says. At the end of the day the Car industry lurches from one pollution driven sales scam to another. 4 Star to Unleaded, Unleaded to Diesel, Diesel to small Unleaded turbo’s, that to Electric.

    Each is a leap in marketing and Sales drive, yet each has relatively little impact on the planet compared to City, Air and Industrial pollution. Individuals in here justifying move to Hybrid and Electric should look at the environmental cost of thier vehicle production, real MPG and source of thier ‘leccy.

    Its certsinly far from cut and dried fuel vs fuel. Reduction in emitting vehicles is the highest impact.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Each is a leap in marketing and Sales drive, yet each has relatively little impact on the planet compared to City, Air and Industrial pollution. Individuals in here justifying move to Hybrid and Electric should look at the environmental cost of thier vehicle production, real MPG and source of thier ‘leccy.

    That may be true on a global scale, but in this country, diesel vehicles are dominant source of poor local air quality.

    Dickyboy
    Full Member

    Anyone read the beeb article on air pollution in the Alps today? Wood burners – burn them, err oh 😕

    Ben_H
    Full Member

    wicki – Member
    How many people in this thread have young children with asthma type problems and live in a city

    Genuinly interested as it seams all our grand kids from the city have breathing problems.

    My younger child has asthma – we live in a city.

    Dickyboy
    Full Member

    Unfortunately car is king, need a massive shift in public perception but even as car dislikers we find it’s hard not to get sucked in and alternative transport provision is woeful at the best of times 🙁

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    Edukator – MARPOL laws are international, flag registration has nothing to do with it. And if cruise ships are running heavy in port I’d be very surprised, even when I was working on the ships ten years ago heavy was banned anywhere near land, most of the EU coastline is a special area in one capacity or another. Heavy has also been de-sulphurised for years now, unless you’re buying the absolutely worst bunker fuel made from sludge then I doubt the smoke is any indicator of chemical makeup.

Viewing 11 posts - 81 through 91 (of 91 total)

The topic ‘Diesel air pollution…’ is closed to new replies.