jambs taking 2 opposing positions on it depending on how he wants to score points being the perfect example.
Nail on the head imo. jambalaya sees the Chilcot Inquiry as opportunity to gain maximum political millage to suit his own agenda. Speculating what it might contain rather than waiting until after July 6th when a more informed discussion can take place (apparently despite being over 6 years in the making he’s too impatient to wait another month) fits in nicely with that frame of mind – he can make all sorts of claims about the inquiry without waiting for the actual facts.
.
With reference to this comment by jambalaya :
“A Prime Minister is under no obligation so do so or even seek a debate or a vote.”
The British legislative process is based largely on tradition and protocol.
This is the headstone above Robin Cook’s grave :
“I may not have succeeded in halting the war, but I did secure the right of parliament to decide on war”[/b]