Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 83 total)
  • Caught speeding
  • Lifer
    Free Member

    I got caught stealing once. When I was 5.

    peterfile
    Free Member

    Hahaha its just the area code

    My van has st does that make me an un marked car

    Notice anything similar about the registrations?

    That’s a marked list, they generally won’t supply unmarked lists, however the vast majority i’ve seen on the roads also have SF plates.

    Like I said, if you have an SF plate behind you it’s probably a wise idea not to speed.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Got caught once – it was valentines day i claimed my GF had dumped me form mey best mate and i was very upset and distraught. I was about 19 at the time.
    He was actually really nice and told me to calm down and plenty more fish in the sea etc

    Never been stopped for speeding since

    mogrim
    Full Member

    I got caught stealing once. When I was 5.

    Do you enjoy stealing, then?

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    Lifer – Member

    I got caught stealing once. When I was 5.

    Yes, but you enjoy stealing. It’s just as simple as that.

    Leku
    Free Member

    “But I’m trying to get a KOM..”

    simmy
    Free Member

    There’s a black Audi A5 ( I think ) around here in Manchester that’s unmarked with a SW61 plate so, checking the lists above, that’s been registered in Aberdeen.

    They all used to be MX, MV plates etc, which is Manchester, but they are getting savvy about it now.

    I once got let off with 70 mph in a 30 as it gone flying into a road and 2 Police motorbikes saw my driving like a idiot but, as they was coming the other way by the time they had turned round and caught me I was sat in traffic so they couldn’t get a track on me.

    They knew full well I’d flown down there as they said they had done 60 and couldn’t catch me.

    That’s the most dangerous, stupidest thing I’d ever done and looking back now, the consequences of my driving that morning could have been catastrophic.

    I can’t even be bother getting upto 70 on the motorway most of the time now and just chill with the HGVs

    Lifer
    Free Member

    mogrim – Member

    Do you enjoy stealing, then?

    Only when I want something, but don’t want to pay for it.

    brakes
    Free Member

    I once did 120mph through a supermarket in my Morris Marina.
    In reverse.

    surroundedbyhills
    Free Member

    probably about 115mph.

    THIS…

    does not equal

    here’s a £60.00 ticket,

    You’ll learn that the hard way…

    geordiemick00
    Free Member

    as someone who does 45k a year in the car I can’t be arsed to stick to the shitty damn stupid 1950’s limit invented for cars with drum brakes….

    In the main I cruise (where I can) around 90mph. I don’t bully people out my way, I don’t hog the middle or outer lane and I USE my indicators ( in my BMW believe it or not) and I show courtesy to others…

    Coming out of Blackpool a few weeks ago I was on M55 doing about 95mph for a good 8-10 miles, for a while I noticed a 3 series a fair distance behind me. For a few miles I cruised along, kept left when not overtaking and used my indicators.. Then I started to wonder ‘what if that’s an unmarked car’ and slowly slowed down to 80mph and I then noticed the LED”s in the grill and thought ‘ooopss’…

    He creeped up on me (by that time I’m doing bang on 70mph) and smiled at me as he passed me…. Literally seconds later someone in a X5 came thrashing off the slip road, straight into lane 3 and then proceeded to drive up the arse of another car. Within seconds the same car who had followed me for miles lit up his hidden lights and pulled the X5 over.

    Last month I was on A1M up Dishforth and was doing 95mph on long straight, sunday morning around 9:30 and as I appeared from two overtaking trucks I saw the marked car parked up on the ramp, nailed the brakes but too late…. 3points £60 fine. Was polite with the guy and just said fair cop. He told me vast majority of motorway rozers have a personal limit of 90mph and anything over is fair game.

    Which is what a copper who pulled me for doing 92 said on the A19 a few Christmas’s ago, but let me off because it was christmas and he remarked that my driving was efficient and courteous but just a little to fast 😆

    The faster the speed limit is raised the better in my opinion

    Aound town’s, the 30/40/50 limits I tend to stick to but the motorways I get my foot down where I can

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    According to the aforementioned copper on Sunday, on the completely empty 3-lane 40mph limit A Road, if I’d been doing 50 or under he’d have let me off. As it was I was doing 59, as I’d just decided to put my foot down to make the most of the completely empty 3-lane 4-mph A Road. 😡

    ransos
    Free Member

    as someone who does 45k a year in the car I can’t be arsed to stick to the shitty damn stupid 1950’s limit invented for cars with drum brakes….

    The 70mph motorway limit didn’t exist in the 1950s.

    xiphon
    Free Member

    You’re far more likley to get pulled by a copper driving behind you if you’re driving dangerously. This would include inexperienced boy-racers in their Saxo’s doing 95+

    A driver who uses their indicators, correct lanes, and gives sufficient space to other road users (for braking distances, and safe overtaking) would be regarded as far safer on the roads than many other road users.

    I’m sure the traffic cameras on motorways help alert coppers on the road of dangerous drivers miles ahead (or behind)

    I probably cruise around 85-90, much less if the traffic is heavy.

    freddyg
    Free Member

    Heading north up the A1 very late one Sunday evening a few months ago…

    Shortly after I had pulled onto the A1 and accelerated up to about 80mph, two cars (silver E Class and black Octavia VRS estate) came past rather quickly. I decided to tag along. They were cruising at over 90 and stuck to the right, overtaking lane. Where appropriate, I kept left (hoping they would do too – it’s a pet hate of mine)

    This continued for about 25 miles – the Merc leading the procession, stuck to the right lane.

    I nearly soiled myself when, at the M18 junction, the Octavia lit up like a red and blue christmas tree and pulled the Merc over.

    theflatboy
    Free Member

    Wouldn’t it have lit up like a green Christmas tree with blue and red lights?

    xiphon
    Free Member

    Heading north up the A1 very late one Sunday evening a few months ago…

    Shortly after I had pulled onto the A1 and accelerated up to about 80mph, two cars (silver E Class and black Octavia VRS estate) came past rather quickly. I decided to tag along. They were cruising at over 90 and stuck to the right, overtaking lane. Where appropriate, I kept left (hoping they would do too – it’s a pet hate of mine)

    This continued for about 25 miles – the Merc leading the procession, stuck to the right lane.

    I nearly soiled myself when, at the M18 junction, the Octavia lit up like a red and blue christmas tree and pulled the Merc over

    The copper probably could have called his mates to join the motorway to book you, but perhaps your “safe” driving (plenty of space, moving into correct lanes, etc) made them think twice?

    peterfile
    Free Member

    Wonder why they waited 25 miles to pull them over? Perhaps they were hoping he’d do over a ton?

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Possibly following a suspect in a case, and were waiting for confirmation of something before pulling him over.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I can’t be arsed to stick to the shitty damn stupid 1950’s limit invented for cars with drum brakes…

    a) They’re not stupid, they are an attempt to enforce CONSISTENT driving from everyone. Everyone goes on about lovely French motorways – the biggest reason they are lovely is that all the cars are doing similar speeds. This makes them look particularly quiet, cos you don’t have to pass or be passed much.

    b) Cars were worse in the 60s, but traffic volumes were far lower. That’s why the limit has’t changed.

    c) If you can’t be arsed to follow the rules, you’re being a dick. What else can’t you be arsed to do? Indicate? Give way at roundabouts? Pay for your shopping? If everyone followed the rules, there’d be far fewer incidents and far less road rage, we’d all be happier. People feeling that they know best ends up with everyone doing something different which means there’s far less predictability, and that can only mean more accidents.

    patriotpro
    Free Member

    Say it was your wife

    klumpy
    Free Member

    Wonder why they waited 25 miles to pull them over? Perhaps they were hoping he’d do over a ton?

    It’s a fair point, if a copper is prepared to just sit behind and watch while you’re speeding, that’s a strong implication that it’s not dangerous. (M’lud.)

    After all if a bike was about to fall off your roof, or one of your wheels looked loose, he’d stop you immediately, not spend 3 miles “gathering evidence”.

    (I am not a lawyer, by the way.) 😆

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    I can’t be arsed to stick to the shitty damn stupid 1950’s limit invented for cars with drum brakes….

    Bit of a silly argument this.

    A major factor in stopping distances is thinking/reaction time.
    Modern brakes might be better than they were in the 50s but our reaction times are the same.

    In fact they are probably worse on average given the number of in-car distractions these days.

    (also the 70mph limit wasn’t actually imposed till 1965, before that there was no upper limit on motorways)

    brakes
    Free Member

    Modern brakes might be better than they were in the 50s but our reaction times are the same.

    but aren’t reaction times a small proportion of the time taken to stop? it probably takes less than half a second to react, but 10 times that to stop at high speed. I bet it was 20 times that in 50s cars (or even 60s when the 70mph limit was introduced).

    I think the point about traffic volume is more valid. But also that coppers clearly use discretion, so why change the speed “limit”. I always (when conditions allow) travel at 85-90 on the motorways but haven’t been done yet which means I must be an exceptional driver. 8)

    [fate duly tempted – I’m going to get done now aren’t I?]

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    aren’t reaction times a small proportion of the time taken to stop?

    Well, the official stopping distances are:

    So based on those figures, if you are travelling at 90mph you will travel 27 metres in your reaction time. About a car and a half length further than you do at 70mph.

    That’s before you even hit the brakes.

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    you don’t HAVE to have a speedometer fitted, just take it out.

    brakes
    Free Member

    so by 60s standards, at 90mph you travel 27m just thinking, then maybe 120 braking! I wonder how much that would be with 2013 standard brakes? 27m thinking and 60m braking?

    Didn’t Top Gear do this once?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    27m thinking and 60m braking?
    Didn’t Top Gear do this once?

    Indeedy.

    [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KGkKDaYd3Mo[/video]

    There are improvements, but the Escort still takes 198ft (about 60m) from 70mph.

    And of course that is all based on drivers doing full emergency stops – in reality most drivers would be slightly more hesitant before hitting the full anchors at top speed on a motorway. Especially if they have a rep mobile sitting 12 inches from their back bumper.

    toby1
    Full Member

    Have you been on a motorway recently? Pretty much every journey I have done in the last 6 months I have seen an accident or the remains of one.

    Motorway limits could increase, but until the driving standards also increase there is just no point. 70, fewer deaths and better driving from everyone please 🙂

    unovolo
    Free Member

    “Sorry Officer I was just testing out the new Flux Capacitors, Marrrrtttttyyyyyyyyy!”

    FeeFoo
    Free Member

    Everyone goes on about lovely French motorways – the biggest reason they are lovely is that all the cars are doing similar speeds. This makes them look particularly quiet, cos you don’t have to pass or be passed much.

    Or maybe they look quiet because it’s a country three times the size of the UK, but with the same population?

    Woody
    Free Member

    If everyone followed the rules, there’d be far fewer incidents and far less road rage, we’d all be happier.

    ………………and if they waited to take their turn overtaking, everyone could be fluffy as a cloud 😉

    joemarshall
    Free Member

    Or maybe they look quiet because it’s a country three times the size of the UK, but with the same population?

    And because you have to pay to get on them, so you don’t have so many people using them for shortish journeys. Like m1 Leicester to Nottingham, where there’s tons of traffic both ways going a shortish distance, in France, people might well save the money and use A road equivalents, most of the people on a Peage in france are going a long distance.

    collinstiffee
    Free Member

    Everyone flips over the limit once in a while. Just as sometimes that amber shows and doesn’t last as long as it should. Can I advise if that does happen admit nothing. If you were driving like a **** Then confess otherwise say you don’t know why they pulled you over. Sorry. But well…

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I’ve not much to add to this other than to say Mogrim and Lifer’s exchange on the previous page gave me the giggles.

    That and,

    a) They’re not stupid, they are an attempt to enforce CONSISTENT driving from everyone.

    Not true. Motorway speed limits were introduced to prevent motor manufacturers using public roads as test tracks.

    (and playing devil’s advocate, by your argument any arbitrary limit should have the same effect effect)

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Everyone flips over the limit once in a while.

    It’s very rare that anyone gets stopped or fined for just slipping over the limit. Cops (and even the speed cameras) have a bit of discretion.

    If the police stop you when you are doing 85 or less in a 70 then chances are you were driving badly, as well as speeding.

    Just as sometimes that amber shows and doesn’t last as long as it should.

    Can never be said enough: AMBER MEANS STOP.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Not true. Motorway speed limits were introduced to prevent motor manufacturers using public roads as test tracks.

    Yes, I know that. But that’s a big reason for still having them, but people don’t seem to be aware of this.

    xiphon
    Free Member

    Amber means “Stop if you safely can”

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Amber means “Stop if you safely can”

    Indeed.

    Or more precisely it means Stop unless “you have already crossed the stop line or are so close to it that to stop might cause a collision.” (Rule 175)

    So collinstiffee’s statement “sometimes that amber shows and doesn’t last as long as it should” makes no sense, unless he is one of the many drivers who apparently think amber means “floor it before they go red”.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    floor it before they go red”.

    you get better drivers than i do i see the

    floor it as it has only just gone red – still lets complain about cyclists RLJ

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 83 total)

The topic ‘Caught speeding’ is closed to new replies.