I fancy a new bike to run alongside my Five. I’ve not got a fortune to spend and I’d like a relatively fast and light hardtail, so I’ve narrowed it down to a 456 carbon, scandal 29er or lurcher.
I’ve ridden a steel 456 before and liked it, so I’m confident I’ll get on with the 456 carbon, but a couple of mates have suggested a 29er would be better. Has anyone got any thoughts on this?
I’m fully aware I’m opening the 26 vs 29 debate yet again (sorry), but I’m torn. I know how the 26 will ride, and parts (tyres) will be swappable between the bikes, but would the scandal or lurcher really be that much better? I live near the lakes, and rough, technical riding is what I like riding, but I don’t want a hardtail replica of the Five. Arghhhh…