<div class=”bbp-reply-author”>eddiebaby
<div class=”bbp-author-role”>
<div class=””>Subscriber</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class=”bbp-reply-content”>
I do like taking the piss out of train “drivers” in my local. Lets face it, its not like they actually steer the things.
And they get really (REALLY) angry when you query why a job that could be so easily automated pays so well.
When something goes wrong on a train, you’ll be glad it wasn’t automated. Whether that be a fault or an accident or something passenger related.
As for driver only trains, in an accident the driver’s relatively likely to be incapacitated. And they’re no use when there’s a problem on board like abusive passengers or even something simple like people in the wrong seats.80% of all accidents involving the train/platform interface happened on driver-only trains even though they account for only 30% of services- and those incidents account for 50% of all fatalities and serious injuries on UK trains.
(that by itself isn’t so much an argument for guards; but it’s proof that there aren’t sufficient safeguards to make driver-only trains adequately safe. Extra platform resources or technological solutions could overcome this, but they don’t)