Home Forums Chat Forum Breaking up the Union. What would it mean for the constituent countries?

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 320 total)
  • Breaking up the Union. What would it mean for the constituent countries?
  • SurroundedByZulus
    Free Member

    The Scottish goverment elections are coming up fairly soon, and from where I am sitting the SNP are in with a really good chance of getting a majority this time round.

    With that would come an independence referendum and probably eventually independece.

    When that day comes what will it mean for the countries that at present make up the UK?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Doubtful they could get a vote on independence passed. Its always a lower number of people want independence than vote SNP.

    Scotland would be richer not having to support England. Scotland would be nuclear free in a very few years.

    England would have a tory government for ever

    toys19
    Free Member

    TJ you make the assumption that england would let scotland keep its budget and revenue generating assets..

    akira
    Full Member

    I’m pretty sure one of them would sink.

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Toys – its clear in law – there is Scottish and English marine resources

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    england would let scotland keep its budget and revenue generating assets..

    you are making the assumption they would /could take it.
    Engand would split IMHO the north is nowhere neare as right wing as the the south [generally]

    duckman
    Full Member

    Toys;how could the English stop them? Tourism and what little is left of the oil are in Scottish territory.They will NOT win a ref on full indy,so it is a bit of a non-issue anyway. As a wee aside,before the free-prescriptions brigade launch forth,how much are the LONDON Olympics costing the rest of the UK? (Takes his place in the Schiltron next to Junkyard and err..TJ)

    toys19
    Free Member

    Toys;how could the English stop them

    Probably all out war!

    This has already been discussed in parliment has it not, during the early stages of devolution there was a whole clause about the underground and marine assets not being part of it, some crap about them already being owned by the crown (or UK plc or something like that). It would be like Scotland going independent and taking TJ’s flat because he isn’t scottish.

    EDIT – Duckman, I don’t want the bloody olympics, I don’t think they are good for anyone except those people building edifices to themselves.

    TheSouthernYeti
    Free Member

    TJ – step away from the forum chap. You’re being baited.

    duckman
    Full Member

    Flats don’t you know TJ is a property tycoon now? 😀

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    The Southern Yeti – Member

    TJ – step away from the forum chap. You’re being baited.

    Indeed. Not very subtly either

    TheSouthernYeti
    Free Member

    What’s the weather like up there at the moment?

    I’m planning on travelling light, do you think I’ll get away with shorts and flip flops?

    Serious question.

    toys19
    Free Member

    YAwn…
    Who’s baiting who? There is a discussion to be had here, and quite an interesting one.

    JEngledow
    Free Member

    The Crown Estate owns Britain’s entire inter-tidal zone, therefore if England and Scotland were to split the Queen still has full control of all of the oil and gas coming ashore. As the Crown Estate is separate to both England and Scotland (but pays into the treasury) what happens there?

    TheSouthernYeti
    Free Member

    Okay, as you were.

    Anyone fancy a ‘where did your username come from’ thread?

    toys19
    Free Member

    The Crown Estate owns Britain’s entire inter-tidal zone, therefore if England and Scotland were to split the Queen still has full control of all of the oil and gas coming ashore. As the Crown Estate is separate to both England and Scotland (but pays into the treasury) what happens there?

    That was my point..

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    JEngledow

    There is clear legal precedent for dividing up offshore assets and when North sea oli was first being explored it was divided into Scottish and English zones as Scotland has a differnt legal system

    akira
    Full Member

    Could we just copy and paste one of the previous threads and all go to the pub instead?

    toys19
    Free Member

    This might be true but as I said before the UK Parliament when it set up devolution made a point of excluding these assets. If it was as easy as you say then why would the SNP be campaigning to get all of its oil revenue after independence?

    TheSouthernYeti
    Free Member

    akira – what are you drinking? Grab a table in the sun and I’ll get some pork scratchings an’ all.

    ditch_jockey
    Full Member

    I suspect LIz will play ball if she doesn’t want the council tax on Balmoral to increase by a fairly substantiall amount – say £100 million?

    Is there room in the Schiltron for one more – I brought my own spear and painted my arse specially/

    Beagleboy
    Full Member

    Scottish Independence? My opinion?

    Scotland would eventually become the Albania of Western Europe. 😕

    Is no-one proud to be British anymore? Each of the constituent parts of Great Britain is a rich and prosperous nation because it’s part of a greater entity.

    I will never understand why anyone would want independence. Look at where we stand in the world as a United Kingdom! Oh, and I think we should have a GB footie team. 😈

    Beagy

    binners
    Full Member

    We all know what will happen. There would be an alliance formed of small, independent countries… lets think of an abstarct name for such a concept… erm… I”VE GOT IT… an Arc Of Prosperity. Us left behind in England would be powerless in the face of such a thing and would return to the dark ages, living in mud huts and eating our own young. The whole country would look like Yorkshire

    Anyway… I think Akira’s right. We could all meet somewhere accessible, just over the border perhaps. Somewhere we could ride bikes. Glentress anyone? 😀

    ditch_jockey
    Full Member

    Scotland would eventually become the Albania of Western Europe.

    More likely to be England – once the banks up sticks and head for pastures new what have you got left to generate income? Actually, given you won’t even be able to afford the electricity we currently sell you at subsidised rates, you’re more likely to become the Ukraine to our Russia.

    Anyway, as others have said already, I doubt there will be a vote for independence up here anytime soon – we’re currently demonstrating how devolution has given us enough of a safety zone from another Tory government, so the motivation isn’t anywhere near as strong as it was post-Thatcher.

    binners
    Full Member

    There is clear legal precedent for dividing up offshore assets and when North sea oli was first being explored it was divided into Scottish and English zones as Scotland has a differnt legal system

    Have you seen the way we have of dealing with potential threats to our oil supply 😉

    toys19
    Free Member

    I love the way TJ refuses to engage with me. He won’t argue with anyone who is prepared to actually stand up to his opinion, he just comes on here makes a statement and only talks to like minded people. Weak.

    JEngledow
    Free Member

    There is clear legal precedent for dividing up offshore assets and when North sea oli was first being explored it was divided into Scottish and English zones as Scotland has a differnt legal system

    I’m not asking about the off shore assets, but the short section of pipe between the sea and the land which is on land leased from the Crown Estate.

    As ditch_jockey says the Queen would probably just play ball (if Charlie doesn’t do her in first!), but it could still go either way!

    ditch_jockey
    Full Member

    Have you seen the way we have of dealing with potential threats to our oil supply

    Will you send both Tornados at once, or one at a time to keep us guessing?
    Ur airforce is Saracin

    TooTall
    Free Member

    TJ – there isn’t all that much oil left under the N Sea. The Scots (and the Surrey Highlanders like yourself) would be akin to Bahrain and other similar countries – a few years of boom then desperate scrabbling to find something else to generate the squandered income now depleted. Far less of the boom than the Middle East as so little is left.

    TooTall
    Free Member

    Will you send both Tornados at once, or one at a time to keep us guessing?

    It wouldn’t matter – angry drunk men painted in blue woad throwing stones is not a Ground Based Air Defence System worth talking about.

    waveydavey
    Free Member

    Never mind oil, I believe the future will be renewables and I sincerely hope Scotland takes the lead as it’s a natural resource base for wind, wave, tidal et al.
    I don’t believe it would have much affect on the other countries, but would certainly improve the identity we have with our respected countries.

    bagpuss72
    Free Member

    It’s all rubbish all of it, I’ll be on this if anyone wants me I’m sailing away from all of it…..

    anyone want to stow away?

    TheSouthernYeti
    Free Member

    Room for a little one Bagpuss?

    kevin1911
    Full Member

    I often wonder about the practicalities of becoming an independent country.

    Like, would we need to start up our own army, navy and TAF (teuchters air force).

    What would we do about currency. Surely not adopt the Euro. So what would the currency be called? Haggis (in lieu of pounds) and neeps (in lieu of pence)? Just Beer Tokens?

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    toys19 – Member

    I love the way TJ refuses to engage with me. He won’t argue with anyone who is prepared to actually stand up to his opinion, he just comes on here makes a statement and only talks to like minded people. Weak.

    Weak bait. This has been done before,I have given you all the data, there is no legal doubt at all about ownership of the oil and other offshore reserves. Clear international treaties and ways of dividing assets, Clear demarcation between English , Scottish and Norwegian fields, you forget the queen is Scotland’s queen as well.

    You didn’t want to listen last time we did this why should I waste my time again especially as its a moot point anyway.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Federal Britain.

    You didn’t want to listen last time we did this

    Y’know, there is a difference between listening and agreeing. We do listen to you, we just don’t agree. You seem to have trouble with that.

    JEngledow
    Free Member

    Just out of intrest, what’s so bad about being British anyway?

    Stoner
    Free Member

    Just out of intrest, what’s so bad about being British anyway?

    they let the scots and welsh in the club too.

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    Molgrips _ I provided him with all the legal stuff which shows very clearly the ownership of the oil. He denies this exists. Its just clear baiting and worthy of being ignored. So yes – he ( and you ) do not listen ‘cos if you did we wouldn’t be back with this dead debate.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I do listen, I just disagree. Not on this, I’m withholding because it’s so complicated that debating it is pointless since no-one can tell what’ll really happen.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 320 total)

The topic ‘Breaking up the Union. What would it mean for the constituent countries?’ is closed to new replies.