• This topic has 17,658 replies, 680 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by Klunk.
Viewing 40 posts - 2,121 through 2,160 (of 17,659 total)
  • Boris Johnson!
  • tjagain
    Full Member

    Obvz doing something right…

    controlling the media.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    A twitter thread to help remind us who our PM is:

    And, sadly, I think his popularity is largely because of all this, not despite it… which reflects very poorly on us, the people of the UK.

    AD
    Full Member

    Another day, another unpublished report…
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53375707
    No doubt the ‘demanding boss’ line will gather momentum – bloody snowflake civil servants etc

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Another shambles for Johnson at PMQs

    admitted he’d not read his governments own report on the 2nd wave

    a question about bereaved families was used as the excuse to slip in a scripted joke about underpants……..

    but he did promise starmer an inquiry of some sort at some point

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    Did he actively say his own government would investigate it, or is it possible it could be delayed so much that he is actually long gone by the time it ever happens?

    As for Grayling as Int Committee, presumably that’s aiming to use Grayling’s enormous incompetence as a sort of report losing device, to lose the Russia report before it surfaces?

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    but he did promise starmer an inquiry of some sort at some point

    Much like the one into Islamophobia within the Conservative Party that he promised about a year ago and which has never been heard of since.

    And even when Reports, Reviews and Inquiries are commissioned and actually happen, they often seem to mysteriously stall between closing and publication.

    Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War is a classic example and obviously the report into Russian interference which I’m assuming must say something like “oh yes, when Dominic Cummings lived in Russia, we turned him then, he’s actually Senior Advisor to Vladimir Putin”.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    As for Grayling as Int Committee

    kimbers
    Full Member

    He even failed at that ?

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    He even failed at that ?

    Just when you think his failings couldn’t get any worse, he fails at winning a job contest rigged by the Prime Minister himself.

    That’s quite a spectacular level of incompetence from both Failing Grayling and Boris Johnson!

    frankconway
    Full Member

    9 on the committee; 5 appointed by johnson; 3 by labour; 1 SNP.
    Labour member & SNP made it clear they would support Julian Lewis so he voted for himself as well resulting in 5-4 surprise.

    binners
    Full Member

    Chris Grayling really couldn’t even find his own arse, using both hands 😂

    ditch_jockey
    Free Member

    That’s hilarious (leaving aside the painful reality that we’re all paying his salary) – in a kinder age, he’d lock himself in his study with a loaded revolver and a whisky, but if he tried to blow his own brains out, there’s a fair chance he’d miss 🙂

    binners
    Full Member

    He’ll probably still have managed to spaff a couple of hundred million of taxpayers money in the process.

    Is anyone keeping a running total? His ****-ups must have cost about the same as the banking crisis by now?

    johnx2
    Free Member

    but if he tried to blow his own brains out, there’s a fair chance he’d miss 🙂

    Difficult target, to be fair…

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    there’s a fair chance he’d miss

    and in the process spill the whisky

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    Ok so apparently the word “winningest” is a thing so do we now have “failingest” too?😁

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    As in ‘failingest Graylingest’?

    Lewis thing is interesting. He is a hard Brexiteer but that likely means he will loathe Cummings.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    It gets even funnier

    kimbers
    Full Member

    johnx2
    Free Member

    Marina Hyde last week:

    For now, Grayling’s ascent to chairman is expected to be a formality. I very much enjoyed last night’s Guardian headline, “Grayling closes in on role as chair of UK intelligence committee”. Closing in suggests a degree of targeted precision that Chris Grayling’s career does not. The only way Chris Grayling could close in on the intelligence and security chair is if he was actually attempting to close in on the keys to a holiday caravan in Rhyl.

    colournoise
    Full Member

    Should read ‘Gray Team’ surely?

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    @kimbers That’s going to backfire spectacularly. It’s not going to make Lewis more pliable, and it just makes Johnson look more spiteful and vindictive than he does already.

    kelvin
    Full Member

    It gets even funnier

    The purge continues. It’s no longer a political party.

    Oh, and he was an argent Brexitier, this is no longer about Europe (if it ever really was).

    AD
    Full Member

    Bloody brilliant! Inept PM thinks he has stitched up the nomination – gets stitched up himself and then acts like a spoiled child and removes the whip 🙂

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Not said it for a page or two, but he is a despicable shit of a man.

    Poopscoop
    Full Member

    Al this would make for a really shit tv series. We are in a parallel universe from a few years ago, in sure of it.

    About 14% on Rotten Tomatoes?

    kimbers
    Full Member

    How mad is Cummings ?

    Will they try & remove Lewis from the committee?

    He’s a brexit true believer, so can’t see that going down well, I’m sure anything vaguely bad in the Russia report will be heavily redacted anyway.

    Might be more of a problem with Cummings planned cuts to the military

    frankconway
    Full Member

    Committee is meeting tomorrow; could be v interesting.

    Riksbar
    Full Member

    This seems to imply that being on message with the Russian interference is more important than being on message with Brexit. In a government whose raison d’etre (treason d’etre?) is to deliver Brexit. I met Julian Lewis when he was with the Defence Select Committee, and whilst he was known as a maniac, he was also a Russia hawk, and will not be about to hush up anything he feels is harmful to British interests by them.

    somafunk
    Full Member

    Not said it for a page or two, but he is a despicable shit of a man.

    not said often enough, should be a sticky at the top of every page of this thread.

    im perplexed as to how he’s not been punched/slapped when out n’ about on his arranged factory/shop walkabouts for the tv/press photo opportunities

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    Too much security, presumably.

    This seems to imply that being on message with the Russian interference is more important than being on message with Brexit. In a government whose raison d’etre (treason d’etre?) is to deliver Brexit

    Brexit?

    The deadline for anything other than total-f-up-Brexit has passed. It’s no longer a goal of The Cummings Party. It is not something The Cummings Party need to fight anyone over, in order to stay in power.

    The main required attribute of any member of The Cummings Party at this point in time, is simply blind unswerving loyalty and obedience to The Dear Leader Dominic Cummings.

    If any member is found
    guilty of treason
    to be ideologically impure
    acting on their own opinion and judgement,
    they will be expelled from The Party.

    Riksbar
    Full Member

    The main required attribute of any member of The Cummings Party at this point in time, is simply blind unswerving loyalty and obedience to The Dear Leader Dominic Cummings.

    But Dear Leader Seems to have a goal of some sort in mind, which appears to be achievable within the next 6 months or so. What is that goal? Is it a one way transaction which, once it is done is irreversible ( or difficult to recover from). For him to deliver it requires blind loyalty, but of a particular type, and of a type which does not always tie in with having the UK’s interests as a priority.

    johnx2
    Free Member

    Yeah, and levity aside about this epic grayl, select committees exist to hold government to account and are meant to operate independently of whip’s offices.

    https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/brief-guides/select-committees.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwioypu1rdHqAhWCShUIHdLoDf0QFjALegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0qpge5tH32UQdn2QwTAzvd

    Seems that’s all gone now.

    dannyh
    Free Member

    The purge continues. It’s no longer a political party.

    Something I keep saying to dyed in the wool ‘traditional’ tories. This is not the party of personal prudence, reliance on family, cricket on the village green etc. It is a kleptocracy masquerading as populist nationalism. They’re going to leave us with the political nastiness when they’ve **** off with their payouts.

    martinhutch
    Full Member

    It’s a Parliamentary Committee, which has gone through proper procedures to elect its Chair. While the Tories are welcome to withdraw the whip from Julian Lewis, they can’t remove him from the committee.

    So they’ve not only failed to get their useful idiot candidate in place, but by peevishly kicking Lewis out, have created a 5-4 opposition/independent majority on a key parliamentary committee. The very committee which controls the release of the Russia Report which Boris and Dom seem so interested in suppressing. <Slow handclap>

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Russia report won’t be that interesting & I’m sure Cummings cares little

    Cummings angry because he wants big cuts to the military & Lewis will oppose them

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/army-to-be-cut-by-20-000-if-no-10-plan-is-approved-bc2zbqm2h

    mehr
    Free Member

    frankconway
    Full Member

    As the committee was created by John Major – oh, yes! – when he was PM, does johnson have the authority to disband it?
    If he does, would he?

    kelvin
    Full Member

    It’s pure BoJoCum to withdraw the whip from an MP for not doing the thing that a “No10 spokesman” explicitly said he was not being asked to do.

    mrmonkfinger
    Free Member

    Indeed. Publicly announce one thing, whilst privately demanding another.

    It’s almost like the internal workings of an old communist state.

    Something I keep saying to dyed in the wool ‘traditional’ tories. This is not the party of personal prudence, reliance on family, cricket on the village green etc. It is a kleptocracy masquerading as populist nationalism.

    Exactly.

Viewing 40 posts - 2,121 through 2,160 (of 17,659 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.