Am I wrong in preferring Tony Blair to David Cameron?
IMO yes. I can’t blame Cameron for what he’s doing, after all, he is leader of the Conservative Party.
So for Cameron to be “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich” as Peter Mandelson put it, and do his best to help them achieve greater wealth, is perfectly normal. For the leader of a party which was formed to speak on behalf of ordinary working people in Parliament, it is grotesque.
I somehow doubt there is much substance in the Daily Mail’s story. Tony Blair made it absolutely clear that politics for him was merely a vehicle for his own personal fulfillment when he simultaneously resigned his parliamentary seat, when he announced his resignation as leader of the Labour Party.
He had achieved what he wanted to achieve, ie, he had become Prime Minister and no longer had any further need for politics. If he was no longer in a position to call all the shots and dictate all policies, then he wasn’t interested in playing any more.
A quite unprecedented attitude which was not reflected in other former leaders such as Wilson, Callaghan, Thatcher, and Major. In fact I can think of 4 former leaders in this present parliament – Haig, Duncan-Smith, Kennedy, and Brown. Presumably those individuals didn’t enter politics purely for their own personal fulfillment.
If Blair is really keen to renter the political limelight then I reckon he would be better off taking American nationality. Apparently Americans are particularly fond of the warmongering liar who served their country so well.
Blair was, and is, a liar a cheat a charlatan and a fraud.
So you’ll probably need to widen your social circle a bit more if you want to ‘get it’
My social circle includes former and existing members of the Labour Party. The few people I know who have got anything nice to say about Blair have never been members of the Labour Party. Although to be fair ime Blair rarely comes up as a topic of conversation.