- Bike Stolen from Bike Shop – Help!
Here’s the abridged narrative:
My bike was traded in against a new bike. The new bike didn’t fit and had to go back. After weeks of asking where my old bike was, the retailer (who still hasn’t refunded me the £4k I’ve paid him) admitted my bike had been stolen weeks previously.
Has anyone been in a similar situation? How did you get it resolved?
The retailer won’t tell me what the insurers paid him for it. Trade in value was less than market value and there’s no way I can replace the bike for the trade in value with a similar second hand bike.Posted 3 months agocsbMember
These are separate issues.
Your bike was sold to him for a price. He could have sold it or whatever, it’s gone.
You then used the money, plus more to buy a bike. That isn’t up to scratch so you need to get a new one off them or a full refund of what you paid (including the money from the bike you sold him).Posted 3 months agotomhowardSubscriber
His bike was stolen. Sucks to be him.
You bought a bike from him, it’s the wrong size. I *think* you either need one the right size or a refund. But wouldn’t be surprised if you were (legally at least) only entitled to the not fitting bike, that you bought.
Edit: as above, depends at what stage you decided it didn’t fit, and the conditions of the sale.Posted 3 months ago
Onzadog – a swapped dropper and shorter cranks would have sorted it but he wanted nearly full retail on the replacements so another £700. £4k bike was becoming a £4700 bike.
To complicate it I’m an odd shape and right on the border of frame sizes. The smaller frame size top tube would be too short.
CSB – I didn’t sell him anything. Payment was in the form of money and a trade in. The transaction was online. Until I’m satisfied with the goods he has provided he is only a bailee in respect of my bike. He has possession but not title.Posted 3 months agoscaredypantsSubscriber
Until I’m satisfied with the goods he has provided he is only a bailee in respect of my bike. He has possession but not title
Is that correct ? If you’re within the limit for return of online goods (UNUSED), then maybe. You seem pretty certain, so fingers crossedPosted 3 months ago
I’ve no idea if your correct with this bailee thing. I’ll take your word that you are. But what size bike did you request from the dealer ? Was that correctly supplied and in the appropriate condition?Posted 3 months ago
Distance selling aside are bike shops responsible for people buying bikes that the buyer then feels is the wrong size.ghostlymachineMember
Take the 4k bike. Buy new cranks and shorter dropper. Sell old ones. Live with the (small) hit.Posted 3 months ago
Pretty sure that changing cranks and dropper would be well outside the “changing stuff to get it to fit” deal that most dealers do (Usually just stem, saddle and maybe cassette on a brand new, not-yet-been-ridden bike, in my experience on both sides of the desk)
Ghostlymachine thanks for the reply. Given that the retailer operates on part exchange, I had hoped they would have a suitable second hand alternative they could offer.
Folks I’ve been buying bikes mail order for years. Needless to say I had a long chat with the retailer expressing my concerns that, on paper, the geometry didn’t work. The size was recommended by the retailer.Posted 3 months ago
taxi – During the conversation I suggested I might be better just buying the larger size frame and custom building to ensure a good fit. The retailer wasn’t competitive on the component prices so he knew I would spend £1500 on a frame or £4k on a full bike.
I’m not necessarily saying the size recommendation was connected to me suggesting that.Posted 3 months agon0b0dy0ftheg0atMember
If the new bike fit was spotted to be wrong promptly (many online stores offer 30 days IIRC), I would have thought that the bike shop either needs to offer you the same bike in correct size; let you choose another bike using the the cash balance you handed in with your old bike (possibly requiring you to either hand in more cash or for bike shop to give you a partial refund); or give you a full refund for all the cash you handed over with your old bike.
Once you traded it in, your old bike was no longer yours, what happens to it is no longer your concern.
What is your concern is the cash you paid along with the trade in, if the new bike isn’t right and you have conformed to rules on returning the ill-fitting bike.Posted 3 months agodhriderMember
If you trade in a car and have a fault with the new one, its unlikely you’d get the old one back. They’ll fix the new one or I imagine refund you the sale price if it got to that point.
You traded a bike and paid extra £ which meant you got a new bike. You are owed the sale price of the bike you bought and if he doesnt have your bike then it should all be in cash.
How long did you expect him to keep your bike before selling it on?Posted 3 months agoconvertSubscriber
Yep, my vote is you are only entitled to the trade in price back.
This is different to someone who had their bike stolen from a bike shop whilst it was in for servicing. You had effectively sold them your bike for an agreed price. If it was less than it was worth, that’s your lookout for valuing your time over it’s worth sold in a more effective way.
In what state did you return the new bike? Entirely unridden outside? Personally I take 100% responsibility for the fit of a bike bought remotely/online and would not trust anyone else’s judgement. I’m afraid I treat everyone who works in a bike shop at their lowest common denominator. Some I know are excellent but many (and I met a few when I worked in one) are definately not. I would definately not trust the advice of someone who had never met me to size me to a bike.
Could you not have bought a seatpost elsewhere and sold the one on the bike to reduce the cost? Where you aware of the crank length when you bought it?Posted 3 months agohols2Member
I’m not a lawyer, but I think the operative thing here is “possession is nine-tenths of the law”. You accepted a new bike, took it home, and assembled it (which is strange, because a shop would normally deliver it fully assembled), and handed over money and a used bike that both parties agreed were equal in value to the new bike.
However, there’s a pretty good chance that your old bike was worth much more than the documented trade-in value and the seller or one of his mates wants to keep it, or has already stripped it for parts. Whatever the case, you aren’t going to get it back. If the seller has agreed to accept your new bike back as a return, the obvious thing would be that they offer you an equivalent bike in a smaller size. Otherwise, they owe you the agreed value of the bike you bought (i.e. the sum of the money you gave them plus the agreed trade-in value of your old bike). I don’t see how you have much choice but to accept either of those offers if they make them.
TBH, this whole thing doesn’t really add up.Posted 3 months agohols2Member
In what sense?
1. The retailer didn’t assemble the bike before delivery.
2. You returned the bike without getting either a refund or another new bike in exchange.
This seems strange behavior on the part of the retailer. Now, they have your money, your old bike, and you have nothing. Possession is nine tenths of the law, so now you are in the position of either accepting whatever they offer or taking legal action to get your money back.Posted 3 months ago
When I say the bike wasn’t assembled I just mean the handlebars, stem and wheels needed sorting. I didn’t have to build from frame up.
I agree on the value differential. The retailer had a used bike similar to mine up for sale at the time I was browsing his website for my new bike. He had it on for almost twice the trade in he gave me.
Needless to say I wouldn’t be thinking what I was thinking to start this thread if there hadn’t been some snidey behaviour. The retailer agreed to refund me weeks ago and I’m still waiting on my money. A number of promised deadlines for refund have come and gone.
I did suggest some alternative bikes but he just didn’t bite.
The return has cost me nearly £300 (Parcelforce etc) and the retailer has the returned bike back up for sale for the price he sold it to me. Goes without saying my patience has been burned through and my attitude is hardening. I was originally happy enough to absorb the £300, get a prompt refund and go buy another bike.Posted 3 months ago
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.