- Bike prices… fact or fiction?
I’ve been thinking about getting back into motocross and have been looking around at second hand bikes. For some reason today (& i don’t know why not sooner) it struck me how much mountain bike manufacturers are taking the p!55 with their prices. You get a hell of a lot more for your money with a second hand four stroke mx bike. 😯Posted 4 years ago
what are you comparing top end vs top end, budget vs budget or 2nd hand entry level vs top end???
Santa Cruz Tallboy LT Carbon XTR AM 29er Mountain Bike 2014 = £6799.00
New 2013 Honda CRF250R EXTREME with custom graphics kit = £6,649.00
oh.. & cynic-al = don’t be a dickPosted 4 years ago
mikewsmith, my point is.. what you get for your money. If you had £3000 in your pocket & blew it on an mtb, you would get a lot less than if you spent the same amount on an mx bike. Looking at mx bikes over the last few weeks has me questioning the price tags put against a lot of mountain bikes.Posted 4 years agoYoKaiserSubscriber
I think the point folks are trying to make is that for instance the Tall Boy you mentioned with XTR etc would be raced a pro level. The Honda with graphics kit wouldn’t, a quick google shows that pro MX bikes are $30K upwards, I saw mentions of $40K for forks and one bike at $300K.
Would the Honda mentioned not be more comparable to a Rockhopper say?Posted 4 years ago
YoKaiser your kidding yourself if you think a stock carbon Tallboy with xtr is ridden at pro level. Yes it ‘could’ be, but most deffinately wouldn’t without considerable tweaks & upgrades. Pushing the price higher than £6799. At the end of the day we (myself included) are paying over the odds because we are daft enough to do so & the bike companies know it.Posted 4 years ago
Yes it ‘could’ be, but most deffinately wouldn’t without considerable tweaks & upgrades.
What? it can be and it is 🙂
the main difference will be that the factory riders are running next years kit in prototype this year. One of the things about mountain biking is you can go and ride the bike that the pro rides.
I also see plenty racing at a very high level on bikes that cost a lot less than that.
For a comparison the £6,600 Bronson C
approx weight: frame only 4.85lbs
XX1 AM 27.5 – 2014
Rear Mech SRAM XX1
Front Mech n/a
Shifters SRAM XX1 R hand trigger 11spd
Crankset SRAM XX1 34T
Cassette SRAM XX1 10-42
Chain SRAM CN-XX1-A1
Brakes Avid XO Trail Carbon w/180/160mm rotors
Bars Thomson Carbon Riser 730mm
Stem Thomson Elite X4 50mm, 70mm or 80mm
Grips Lizard Skin Peaty lock on
Seatpost Rockshox Reverb Stealth
Saddle WTB Volt SLT Ti
Wheels WTB Frequency Team i23 TCS rims laced to Hope Pro2 hubs
Tires Maxxis High Roller 2 2.3″ EXO Tubeless Ready Kevlar
Tubes Stans Sealant
The only upgrade left to full on Pro is the Enve wheelset for £1,600, what would you change on that bike?
As somebody pointed out how much would you be spending on a MX bike to race in a world series event? How often would you be rebuilding engines? How much does the oil cost and the filters and the bits that snap off and the gear to ride it?
There is choice out there to buy at whatever level you want staying with SC as they seem to be the go to for “Look how obscene the bike prices are” brigade the entry level heckler is £2,600 is that a rip off, is that too much?Posted 4 years agohungry monkeyMember
A salient point on this subject was made on bikeradar the other day by someone
The market for £6k mountain bikes is a tiny fraction of the market for a £14k motorbike (or more accurately, the market for engines in a range of motorbikes and possibly cars, which share the same research and testing).
An analogy might be that a top-end record player costs more than the most expensive DVD player, despite being technically far simpler. But that is partly due to demand for DVD players outstripping record players massively, allowing the manufacturer to ‘scale’ the cost and also use parts for CD players and other items, further off-setting design and tooling costs.
Yet, despite possibly being the most advanced DVD player the world has ever seen, it can never and will never be able to play records.
I agree that £6k is a lot of money and I would never buy a bike for that money, but I like the fact that someone who wants to, can. And that the design technology will help my future mountain bike be better.Posted 4 years agosbobMember
bencooper – Member
It’s amazing, all that money to be made in the bicycle industry and still it’s dominated by small companies, big corporations like Honda and BMW haven’t got involved and made a killing.
The answer is obvious – big companies are stupid.
That will have more to do with profit, not profit margin. 💡Posted 4 years agosolariderSubscriber
A simple law of economics at play here – economy of scale.
It is true that when you think about the technology and number of moving parts that need to be machined, tooled and assembled, motorized vehicles are remarkably good value compared to our bikes upon first glance.
However, look at the scale of manufacture and the reasons quickly become evident. Motor manufacturing has evolved to a highly automated, production line process because of its scale. How many bikes does Santa Cruz make compared to the number of cars or motorbikes that Honda makes? Relatively speaking, bicycle manufacture is still a cottage industry.
A fairer comparison would be to ask why the mega Taiwanese brands such as Giant and Merida (who own and make Speciliazed amongst others) are not significantly cheaper than the boutique brands since they come the closest to operating large scale production line methods and purchasing power in the bike industry.Posted 4 years agostumpy01Member
You can get a whole car for about the price of the mx bike quoted above. Does that mean the mx bike is over-priced and a rip-off?
After all, the car has seating for 5, four wheels and tyres, doors, a floor, a roof, a ventilation system, somewhere to store stuff, windows, locks, a dashboard..Etc etc.
Motorbikes are a real rip off when you look at it like that!Posted 4 years agosolariderSubscriber
I don’t see why I’m being a dick.
I think that means you are talking shit
Do you see the connection between these 2 quotes, and why the OP might have taken offence?
All he said originally was:
You get a hell of a lot more for your money with a second hand four stroke mx bike
An observation, not a statement that he had spotted a million pound opportunity, or the solution to the disparity that he had observed.
Keep it friendly chaps. It’s just a bike forum!Posted 4 years agojohnellisonMember
Supply and demand, innit?
More cars are built than mid- to high-end motocross bikes. Bulk cost of materials goes down, = cars are cheaper.
More mid- to high-end motocross bikes are built than high-end mountain bikes. Bulk cost of materials goes down, = motocross bikes have a comparable cost.
More people buy cars than buy motocross bikes than buy high-end mountain bikes.
We seeing a pattern yet?Posted 4 years agofervouredimageMember
I’m intrigued. What is a high end motocross? I’ve only ever bought motocross bikes available in dealership show rooms which are the same everywhere. There are no low end or top end mx bikes available to the public. If you want an mx bike comparable to that of a pro rider then you buy a standard mx bike and spend another 30k on suspension, bolt ons and engine work.
… But regardless, johnellison is right. It’s just supply and demand. There are also only 5 big players in mx bike manufacturing so the sales are very focused.Posted 4 years ago5thElefantMember
But It’ll be no where near a works factory race bike. The pushbikes are.
It does make you wonder sometimes though doesn’t it.
Works bikes went out in the late 80s.
It’s just different markets. Motocross bikes are sporting equipment.
Bicycles are fashion accessories. The fashion consumer actively want to pay as much as possible regardless of function. Then pay even more to stick shiny bits on them.Posted 4 years agohoraMember
Crackers that someone mentioned a 4k bicycle as though its normal to pay anywhere near 4k for a bicycle. Its not. Yes I’ve got friends who spend x on a stereo etc however alot of people who spend ‘x’ on a bike literally disproportionately spend a worrying amount on a bike over other things in their lives.Posted 4 years agobencooperMember
Whenever I work on my car, I’m amazed at the low standards of manufacturing. Some parts are precision engineering – the engine, air conditioning, stuff like that*, but lots of it is just bashed together. Plate steel, injection-moulded plastic, pop-together parts.
Whereas pretty much every part on a bicycle is made to a high tolerance. If your seatpost is 0.1mm out, it won’t work. If your bottom bracket threads are not perfectly straight, your BB bearings will wobble and wear. That consistent high level of manufacturing quality, combined with low numbers, make it expensive.
Sometimes I get people asking me to make them a copy of a production bike. They’re astounded when I tell them that it’ll be 2 or 3 times the cost of the production bike. People don’t understand how much simple hard work goes into making something – I think a lot of it is down to the fact that most people don’t work with their hands any more.
*And these are parts that are made in huge quantities, shared across models and manufacturers, to take advantage of the economies of scale.Posted 4 years agodragonMember
1) No one races Santa Cruz, they are fashion accessories.
2) You could race at a high enough privateer level on a ~£2000 bike from the likes of Giant or Trek.
3) Most people racing at a top level aren’t paying full price. In the States a few years ago the GF SuperFly was the most popular XC bike by a mile, but trying finding anyone who’d paid the list price was virtually impossible.Posted 4 years ago
Also if you think about it…
A top end trek bike for example contains only one bit made by trek (the frame). all the other bits are bought in at not particularly high volume and probably not dissimilar to what we would have to pay. A frame is probably about a quarter of total cost so Trek cant actually influence the end cost that much at all since they are paying for the profits of all their suppliers.
Motorbikes on the other hand – Normally they make the frame, engine, fairings and probably loads of other bits as well – amounting to a significantly higher percentage of total cost – costs that they can manage themselves.
Lower end mountain bikes come with many more parts made by the manufacturer – stem, bars etc so the costs are much lower. But their is little insensitive for doing this with top end frames because if someone such as myself got hold of a bike like this the first thing we (I) would do is strip all of these perfectly good bits off and replace them with the latest Hope bling; because I’m a fashion victim.
So its all our fault really 🙂Posted 4 years agoSpeederSubscriber
I think a lot of the difference comes from the fact that even when you buy a bicycle complete you are buying a load of separate components from many different manufacturers which have been assembled. Each one of which has had someone taking a cut at each stage on it’s way to you.
There’s a lot of fingers in the pie in the bike business and this bumps the price up considerably. By comparison the motorcycle model is much simplified.
A motorbike is sold as a complete item which has been assembled at cost price and a mark up applied to the whole thing at probably 2 stages as they’re likely to be imported by the manufacturer. I dare say if you tried assembling an MX bike in the same way we do MTBs they’d be correspondingly pricey.
Frustratingly own brand products are seen as carp (I’m a victim of this as much as anyone) and I wouldn’t want a complete Giant or Spesh or Trek or whatever bike as I’d assume it was
sh**perfectly good enough for someone of limited means and/or ability ;o). I want branded components on my bike and I guess I have to pay for it.
So it’s all our own fault really.
Edited to note that ndthornton posted pretty much exactly the same thing as I was typing Great minds and all that ;o)Posted 4 years agofrogstompSubscriber
The topic ‘Bike prices… fact or fiction?’ is closed to new replies.