Did anyone else who signed this get the results of the debate through today?
I scanned the transcript of the debate (which was massive).
It seems that whilst, on the whole most people agreed with the premise of the request, no one was really taking it seriously.
I didn’t see anyone really address the fact that the request was for consistency in application of the law. We have banned something like 80 other people for preaching similar things.
I might be wrong that it wasn’t addressed, as couldn’t read it all (would have taken me all day).
Also, it seems that there was no real objective to the debate. Nothing got decided and the decision of whether to ban him doesn’t fall within the remit of this house. Or am I missing something?