I’ve had a few LB rims- one of the first 26er ones which was stupidly light, I put it in a hardtail and broke it at BPW on a big rock after a load of use, an alu rim of similar weight wouldn’t have lasted a month. They gave me a crash replacement discount so I got a pair for the enduro bike, which lasted til 26er was killed then I sold them on after a decent life. Then got a set of 29er middleweight ones which I broke a rear from last year, ironically also at BPW- no big trauma, it just felt like it’d given all it had and just quietly passed away. Incidentally both broken rims remained rideable- in fact I rode for another 4 days of the holiday on the cracked 26er one. Not true of 2 of the alu rims I damaged in the same time which were immediately unusable.
I am light though. I’m a pretty reasonable rider and they all did uplift days, races, as well as tons and tons of XC and tweed valley offpiste. Each time I broke one i felt it’d overachieved and I really didn’t mind that it broke- wheels are a consumable.
In terms of feel, “harsh”? I have a set of DT 511s which have the exact same dimensions as the LB rims and often have the same tyres, so the best comparison possible- I can’t tell the difference at all except obviously the weight. I suspect that most people who have a strong opinion about carbon harshness (or compliance for that matter) couldn’t recreate it in a blind test…
Buuut, I would definitely say that LB aren’t that cheap anymore, and also that alu rims have got a lot better than they were in that decade. It was always a no-brainer for me before but that last one nearly got a DT alu rim replacement.
And the entire benefit for me, is good mtb lifespan and low weight- for a commuter you don’t need that strength and you can go very light with alu without worrying about clobbering a rock. In fact, I did- found some unfashionable old XC rims. Not as nice to look at but they zip.