German mags seem quite into their pseudo-science, it’s interesting reading but sometimes when you take a step back it’s obvious nonsense- like Bike mag melting an icetech rotor in their test rig, which it seems is something that’s never happened in a bike, but still drawing conclusions from their wonky test. Likewise g-force alone is meaningless without dwell times, and the relationship between those 2 and the outcome on squishy humans isn’t something simple enough to cover in a bike mag review- but g-force is a nice simple “bigger/less” number that seems meaningful even when it’s not.
Still, it’s better than “It didn’t fit me therefore I’m taking points off” a la UK press 😉